I want to program a little "hello world" bare metal application on the Intel Galileo board. Using UEFI to print out text (to UART-1) works well, of course, but I want to access the UART "manually", without any help from UEFI.
In QEMU my code works well:
.h file
#define COM1_PORT (0x03F8)
#define UART_PORT (COM1_PORT)
enum uart_port_offs_t
{ // DLAB RW
THR = 0, // 0 W Transmitter Holding Buffer
RBR = 0, // 0 R Receiver Buffer
DLL = 0, // 1 RW Divisor Latch Low Byte
IER = 1, // 0 RW Interrupt Enable Register
DLH = 1, // 1 RW Divisor Latch High Byte
IIR = 2, // - R Interrupt Identification Register
FCR = 2, // - RW FIFO Control Register
LCR = 3, // - RW Line Control Register
MCR = 4, // - RW Modem Control Register
LSR = 5, // - R Line Status Register
MSR = 6, // - R Modem Status Register
SR = 7, // - RW Scratch Register
};
.c file
void uart_init(void)
{
outb(UART_PORT + IER, 0x00); // Disable all interrupts
outb(UART_PORT + LCR, LCR_DLAB);
outb(UART_PORT + DLL, BAUD_LL); // Set divisor (lo byte)
outb(UART_PORT + DLH, BAUD_HL); // (hi byte)
outb(UART_PORT + LCR, LCR_WORD_BITS_8 | LCR_PAR_NONE | LCR_STOP_BITS_1);
outb(UART_PORT + FCR, FCR_ENABLE | FCR_CLR_RECV | FCR_CLR_SEND | FCR_TRIGGER_16);
outb(UART_PORT + MCR, MCR_DSR | MCR_RTS | MCR_AUX2);
}
ssize_t uart_write(const char *buf, size_t len)
{
size_t written = 0;
while (written < len) {
while (!is_output_empty()) {
asm volatile ("pause");
}
outb(UART_PORT + THR, buf[written]);
++written;
}
return written;
}
main
SystemTable->ConOut->OutputString(SystemTable->ConOut, L"Exiting EFI boot services ...\r\n");
SystemTable->BootServices->ExitBootServices(ImageHandle, map_key);
uart_init();
while (1) {
const char s[] = "UART\r\n";
uart_write(s, sizeof (s) - 1);
}
The specs did not help me very much. I guess that the UARTs on the Intel Galileo board don't use/emulate the normal/legacy COM ports 3F8h, 2F8h, 3E8h, or 2E8h.
Can anyone tell me what I am doing wrong, or even post a minimal bare metal hello world example?
MCR_AUX2
if you are disabling interrupts? 2) Is your receiving system the same for the good "QEMU" and bad "UEFI"? IOW what is you evidence that things are bad? 3) What are value used for baud? That may be oscillator dependent. – Millian