Hard reset of a single file
Asked Answered
P

9

1779

How do I discard the changes to a single file and overwrite it with a fresh HEAD copy? I want to do git reset --hard to only a single file.

Panay answered 22/8, 2011 at 12:12 Comment(6)
git checkout below is the answer. In git, "revert" is something you do to a commit. "Revert" replays the inverse of a historical commit into your working directory, so you can make a new commit that "undoes" the reverted commit. I find this is a frequent point of confusion for people coming to git from svn.Horsewhip
possible duplicate of How do I reset/revert a specific file to a specific revision using Git?Ingleside
If you are interested why you cannot do hard reset with paths, check out my answer there.Areaway
This question assumes, that one knows what a Hard reset is.Ambrose
See also stashing one file: #3041333Buseck
git restore -s main pathTo/MyFileEliezer
V
3061

To reset both the working copy of my-file.txt and its state in the Git index to that of HEAD:

git checkout HEAD -- my-file.txt

-- means "treat every argument after this point as a filename". More details in this answer. Thanks to VonC for pointing this out.

Valentinevalentino answered 22/8, 2011 at 12:16 Comment(9)
More complete answer. +1 ;) For the '--', see also #6561642 (and, more generally, #1192680)Dermatogen
Also, don't forget you can reference a previous commit with HEAD~1 to indicate the penultimate commit.Yuletide
You can leave out HEAD if you are at the head of the current branch - see norbauer.com/rails-consulting/notes/…Midge
Any insight why the reset command (as it says) "cannot do hard reset with paths", and then why the checkout command is not (cannot be?) used for hard-resetting the whole set? (I mean why it has been designed so.)Antevert
@Midge Unfortunately, this is not quite true. From the man page of git checkout: "Overwrite paths in the working tree by replacing with the contents in the index or in the <tree-ish>". I.e. if <tree-ish> is omitted, whatever content in the index will be used to update the working tree. This may or may not differ from HEAD.Onanism
Also, please notice that there is a space between the -- and the file name. Without the space, git believes that you are passing in a parameter and will give a error: unknown option error.Woolson
use git status you will get: Changes not staged for commit: (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed) (use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)Kattegat
Are we sure this is a hard reset? After a hard reset on the branch level, all files are reverted to a specific commit without the need for an additional commit. But this method simply applies specific changes from a given commit and requires additional commit. Is there any way to revert to a specific commit/branch on file level without a need for further commit?Hearsay
it is stated above but I want to emphasize that for reseting multiple files you can give file names separated with Space. git checkout HEAD -- my-file1.txt my-file2.txtFrustule
I
479

Since Git 2.23 (August 2019) you can use restore (more info):

git restore pathTo/MyFile

The above will restore MyFile on HEAD (the last commit) on the current branch.

If you want to get the changes from other commit you can go backwards on the commit history. The below command will get MyFile two commits previous to the last one. You need now the -s (--source) option since now you use master~2 and not master (the default) as you restore source:

git restore -s master~2 pathTo/MyFile

You can also get the file from other branch!

git restore -s my-feature-branch pathTo/MyFile
Invalidism answered 15/1, 2020 at 17:27 Comment(4)
It should be noted that the git documentation still marks this command as experimental.Narwhal
It’s important to understand that git restore <file> is a dangerous command. Any local changes you made to that file are gone — Git just replaced that file with the last staged or committed version. Don’t ever use this command unless you absolutely know that you don’t want those unsaved local changes. (from the docs)Juniper
@Juniper Overwriting local changes is the entire point. Is there some other operation that this command might be confused with?Crystlecs
Does nothing for me!Mudd
M
236

Reset to head:

To hard reset a single file to HEAD:

git checkout @ -- myfile.ext

Note that @ is short for HEAD. An older version of git may not support the short form.

Reset to index:

To hard reset a single file to the index, assuming the index is non-empty, otherwise to HEAD:

git checkout -- myfile.ext

The point is that to be safe, you don't want to leave out @ or HEAD from the command unless you specifically mean to reset to the index only.

Metamathematics answered 3/12, 2016 at 7:39 Comment(5)
What's up with the "--" before myfile.ext?Introduction
@LanceKind As I understand, that's used to demarcate a list of filenames which follows it. Without it, there are cases when git interprets the arguments incorrectly.Metamathematics
Not just filenames. The widely used convention separates options from positional arguments in many utilities. See man bash page. Also mentioned in this answer: unix.stackexchange.com/a/187548/142855Emulsify
Conventionally, the -- is used to tell the program I've finished specifying "options", and from here on, everything will be a positional argument.. Conventionally, "options" are the tokens like --recursive which can appear in any order, or even be combined together in their short form, like with rm -rf. On the contrary, "positional arguments" are much more like arguments passed to a function in a programming language: their position in the list of tokens defines what exactly the program is going to do with them (these are often filenames). -- removes ambiguity as to which is which.Reductive
This is not "hard" resetting anything it just applies changes from some commit and requires additional commit. On branch level hard reset, however, your changes are simply reverted to the commit you wanted to reset to without any additional commitHearsay
M
107

To revert to upstream/master do:

git checkout upstream/master -- myfile.txt
Marcin answered 8/8, 2018 at 21:31 Comment(2)
fatal: invalid reference: upstream/masterAndesite
In this example, upstream is the name of their remote. Most likely yours is origin.Leund
H
14

Reference to HEAD is not necessary.

git checkout -- file.js is sufficient

Hosbein answered 26/6, 2019 at 18:13 Comment(0)
E
11

You can use the following command:

git checkout filename

If you have a branch with the same file name you have to use this command:

git checkout -- filename
Eberhart answered 30/4, 2019 at 18:33 Comment(1)
This will not "hard reset" the file - it only copies the index state to the working tree. A "hard reset" would first reset the index.Tombola
B
8

you can use the below command for reset of single file

git checkout HEAD -- path_to_file/file_name

List all changed files to get path_to_file/filename with below command

git status
Beaman answered 26/3, 2018 at 5:48 Comment(0)
S
1

You can use the following command:

git reset -- my-file.txt

which will update both the working copy of my-file.txt when added.

Soliloquize answered 5/11, 2018 at 8:46 Comment(3)
Does not change the content of the modified file, as requested.Pinprick
That's not specifically the point @ADDQU. The question is how to "hard reset" a file, not to remove it from the staged list.Pinprick
@Pinprick You are correct, but I want to let you know that there is a way too.Soliloquize
E
-30

A simple, easy, hands-on, way to get you out of hot water, especially if you're not so comfortable with git:

  1. View the log of your file

    git log myFile.js

    commit 1023057173029091u23f01w276931f7f42595f84f Author: kmiklas Date: Tue Aug 7 09:29:34 2018 -0400

    JIRA-12345 - Refactor with new architecture.

  2. Note hash of file:

    1023057173029091u23f01w276931f7f42595f84f

  3. Show the file using the hash. Make sure it's what you want:

    git show 1023057173029091u23f01w276931f7f42595f84f:./myFile.js

  4. Redirect file to a local copy

    git show 1023057173029091u23f01w276931f7f42595f84f:./myFile.js > myFile.07aug2018.js

  5. Back up your current file.

    cp myFile.js myFile.bak.js

  6. Open both files in your favorite text editor.

    vim myFile.js
    vim myFile.07aug2018.js

  7. Copy n' paste code from myFile.07aug2018.js to myFile.js, and save.

  8. Commit and push myFile.js

  9. Again view the log, and confirm that your file is properly in place.

  10. Tell your clients to pull the latest, happily watch it work with the old version in place.

Not the sexiest, or most git-centric solution, and definitely a "manual" reset/reversion, but it works. It requires minimal knowledge of git, and doesn't disturb the commit history.

Eudora answered 7/8, 2018 at 18:22 Comment(6)
This answer is far more complex and error prone than any of the solutions which predate it by years.Padding
Why should anyone use this solution!? the true answer is only a simple command.Eberhart
This is the optimal solution for certain circumstances. It has merit for those in a bind, where git is malfunctioning, and for those who need a work-around.Eudora
@Eudora out of curiosity, what certain circumstances is this ideal?Vaclava
"It requires minimal knowledge of git" - this is a (huge) downside, not an upsideJuniper
Actually, even having worked with git for a long time, still in some workflows, copying the proper version to /tmp, navigating to the "wrong" version, "restoring" form /tmp, and committing "feels" safer. What turned me off about this answer though was all the unrelated cruft about using a text editor (instead of diff and/or cp), pushing, talking to clients (which seems to imply a forced push, when in fact nothing in this scenario warrants it)Tompkins

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.