How to hide image broken Icon using only CSS/HTML?
Asked Answered
M

24

320

How can I hide the broken image icon? Example: Example

I have an image with error src:

<img src="Error.src"/>

The solution must work in all browsers.

Mirza answered 26/2, 2014 at 19:40 Comment(3)
I tried to set alt= "", and set to img teg background throw CSS live: {background: url(src), width:...; height:..} but it not true. My img tag must hide then src is broken.Mirza
See a possible solution here - #18485253 but needs JS though. You cannot do this with CSS alone.Gyroplane
See w3schools.com/jsref/event_onerror.asp "onerror" attributePolypetalous
M
390

There is no way for CSS/HTML to know if the image is broken link, so you are going to have to use JavaScript no matter what

But here is a minimal method for either hiding the image, or replacing the source with a backup.

<img src="Error.src" onerror="this.style.display='none'"/>

or

<img src="Error.src" onerror="this.src='fallback-img.jpg'"/>

Update

You can apply this logic to multiple images at once by doing something like this:

document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", function(event) {
   document.querySelectorAll('img').forEach(function(img){
  	img.onerror = function(){this.style.display='none';};
   })
});
<img src="error.src">
<img src="error.src">
<img src="error.src">
<img src="error.src">

Update 2

For a CSS option see michalzuber's answer below. You can't hide the entire image, but you change how the broken icon looks.

Myles answered 26/2, 2014 at 19:59 Comment(9)
You can do it with HTML only using the object tag since it can be used to display images just like the img tag, and doesn't display a broken link if the image doesn't exist, it works in all browsers and as far back as IE8 all by itself, you can even use default images with this method, I posted an answer with details below.Tauto
This worked for me instead of the <object> approach because I needed the image to have a declared margin, but only if a valid image was found, otherwise I needed it to take up zero space. <object> doesn't have the onerror event, so that wasn't an option there. A style rule to remove the margin, using an :empty pseudo class, was never triggered on object.Hammack
I have a question. is there a way possible to give the script common to apply for every image tag on the page instead of giving this particular line of script in every image tag. thank you @Kevin jantzerDakar
@Dakar – yes, you would need to find images on load and attach the common function to each one. You could use jQuery or vanilla JS to accomplish this (I've updated my answer with an example)Myles
In reactJs it is very easy to do that, same principle applies there. Found this tutorial here - youtu.be/90P1_xCaim4. Also adding a preloader (youtu.be/GBHBjv6xfY4) for image hides the transition and helping to provide a good UX.Routinize
<img src="Error.src" onerror="this.style.display='none'"/> a little bit dangerous, if someone add this.src in onerror it will not show imageMathildemathis
we can do without js too. Have a look at it https://mcmap.net/q/98834/-how-to-hide-image-broken-icon-using-only-css-htmlMathildemathis
onerror="this.style.display='none'" worked for mePurser
onerror="this.style.visibility='hidden'" is also useful rather than display none.Wellgrounded
T
196

Despite what people are saying here, you don't need JavaScript at all, you don't even need CSS!

It's actually very doable and simple with HTML only.
You can even show a default image if an image doesn't load. Here's how...

This also works on all browsers, even as far back as IE8 (out of 250,000+ visitors to sites I hosted in September 2015, ZERO people used something worse than IE8, meaning this solution works for literally everything).

Step 1: Reference the image as an object instead of an img. When objects fail they don't show broken icons; they just do nothing. Starting with IE8, you can use object and img tags interchangeably. You can resize and do all the glorious stuff you can with regular images too. Don't be afraid of the object tag; it's just a tag, nothing big and bulky gets loaded and it doesn't slow down anything. You'll just be using the img tag by another name. A speed test shows they are used identically.

Step 2: (Optional, but awesome) Stick a default image inside that object. If the image you want actually loads in the object, the default image won't show. So for example you could show a list of user avatars, and if someone doesn't have an image on the server yet, it could show the placeholder image... no JavaScript or CSS required at all, but you get the features of what takes most people JavaScript.

Here is the code...

<object data="avatar.jpg" type="image/jpeg">
    <img src="default.jpg" />
</object>

... Yes, it's that simple.

If you want to implement default images with CSS, you can make it even simpler in your HTML like this...

<object class="avatar" data="user21.jpg" type="image/jpeg"></object>

...and just add the CSS from this answer -> https://mcmap.net/q/98834/-how-to-hide-image-broken-icon-using-only-css-html

Tauto answered 17/3, 2015 at 23:5 Comment(21)
Somehow I completely missed this idea, when it is so obvious in retrospect! Unfortunately, I don't think the object tag can gracefully handle responsive images like we're starting to see on the img.srcset property :(Unmannerly
Great idea, thank you for that! On a side note, the object-tag is blocking the scroll wheel (in my implementation, at least) ... if this happens to you, just use object { pointer-events: none; } in your CSS (Source: stackoverflow.com/a/16534300)Rosauraroscius
This does break the semantics of image tags, though. I don't know if search engines will like your using of <object> tags instead of <img> tags. Is this approach HTML5-compliant and rendered correctly by all major browsers?Manis
This is HTML4 compliant (compliant since 1997) and rendered correctly by all major browsers since IE8/2009 (other browsers did it much, much earlier). If a search engine doesn't understand an object with an image type is an image, it's had 19 years to catch up to spec so it's probably not a very good engine... Teens that are on the road driving cars now weren't even conceived when this solution met specs... How far back do you want to go? :) This is a rock-solid solution.Tauto
Fun fact, chrome renders an object-tag without the mime-type as follows: <object data="path/to/640x480.png"><html><head><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, minimum-scale=0.1"><title>480 (640×480)</title></head><body style="margin: 0px;"> <img style="-webkit-user-select: none" src="path/to/640x480.png"> </body></html></object>Guanaco
...safari too... But, it shows nothing with mime-type!Guanaco
why is this is better than the above answer?Birdsong
@MonsterMMORPG because it doesn't use JavaScript, and you aren't always allowed to (in a body of an email message, for example).Phore
Sometime between Chrome 66 and Chrome 68, this stopped working. Chrome now shows something that almost looks like an iframe containing the html of the 404 result.Industry
Awesome post! W3C should make this the default implementation of the <img> tag, not an ugly broken image icon. It's a shame we need a workaround to do something that should be obvious.Carpentry
I really hoped it would work, but gmail web and outlook web removed object tag from html email.Anagoge
@elfan, gmail and outlook now support AMP for email, which includes not only broken image support but nearly full-blown applications. AMP for email supports downgrades if the email client doesn't support it as well. There is no reason I can think of to try to use any solution on this answer page any longer. Check out the AMP playground to get started: playground.amp.devTauto
Nice one man. Thanks for sharing. @NickSteele are there any accessibility issues I need to worry about while using this <object>?Carlstrom
Sorry for the late reply Chidiebere. JAWS is the most popular screen reader, it supports the object tag or any other tag for images as long as you have an alt tag. However, this answer is now outdated if you're looking to build anything app-level for non-js implementations like HTML since AMP supports so much more. This solution is only still valid for legacy systems.Tauto
@NickSteele This worked perfect for me except the image failed to load on iOS. But after changing the type from type="image/jpg" to type="image/jpeg" then it loaded in iOS perfectly. Can you update the type attribute in your code to image/jpeg instead?Debrahdebrecen
Just a warning: From my usage, if the image URL returns an HTML page when the image is not found (eg. a single-page-app 404 page), the browser will load the HTML document as an embed (similar to an iframe) within the <object> rather than showing nothing.Blomquist
@NickSteele the question is about html5, not the deprecated html4.Seclusive
@Seclusive Can you explain a bit more? The question does not specify HTML5 anywhere, so I'm not sure what you're saying. Since HTML5 was recommended as standard in Oct 2014 and this question was asked 8 months before that, in Feb 2014, I doubt the asker wanted strictly HTML5. What is more... the solution I propose is HTML5 compliant as of 2 weeks ago, so I'm not sure what you mean? see developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/objectTauto
I generally love the simplicity of this approach. Only problem for me: <object> seems to have very limited CSS-styling capabilities (only inline-css, aspect-ratio doesn't work, ...). So you can place an image with basic styles. But you can't really style it conditionally.Margetmargette
EDIT: aspect-ratio is meant for use with containers, not images. Therefore it doesn't work anyway.Margetmargette
This is a neat approach, but the dealbreaker for me is I lose access to the loading="lazy" attribute that only works on img and iframe :(Oniskey
T
103

Found a great solution at https://bitsofco.de/styling-broken-images/

img {  
  position: relative;
}

/* style this to fit your needs */
/* and remove [alt] to apply to all images*/
img[alt]:after {  
  display: block;
  position: absolute;
  top: 0;
  left: 0;
  width: 100%;
  height: 100%;
  background-color: #fff;
  font-family: 'Helvetica';
  font-weight: 300;
  line-height: 2;  
  text-align: center;
  content: attr(alt);
}
<img src="error">
<br>
<img src="broken" alt="A broken image">
<br>
<img src="https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/218eLEn0fuL.png" alt="A bird" style="width: 120px">
Tammy answered 12/5, 2016 at 16:48 Comment(9)
Awesome solution purely using CSS which should be the accepted answer. The article linked to is outdated, as browser support is now 97,87%: caniuse.com/#feat=css-gencontent.Zobkiw
The linked article has an excellent explanation on how the browsers handle images, but keep in mind that this solution works only if you have a solid background and you want to cover everything with another box of the same solid color, or with another image. This solution is not really removing or hiding the broken image icon, it's just covering it.Barton
What if we have an element and added an image using background-image? Do you know any solution for it?Tristatristam
The problem with this solution is that the alt content will shine through if the image contains transparent areasLumbering
On Chrome 70, it shows the bird + a broken image icon :(Sextuple
^ Same on Firefox 63Centuple
@dailysleaze – On Firefox 64+, this moved to img[alt]::before. You can use display:inline-block if you like, as it's closer to the original.Brandibrandice
As mentioned above, this doesn't work anymore on major browsers, and just the fact that it can unexpectedly break if a browser ships a new version doesn't make me very confident to use thisUnblessed
it just overlays the broken picture on topSeclusive
M
83

If you will add alt with text alt="abc" it will show the show corrupt thumbnail, and alt message abc

<img src="pic_trulli.jpg" alt="abc"/>

1st

If you will not add alt it will show the show corrupt thumbnail

<img src="pic_trulli.jpg"/>

2nd

If you want to hide the broken one just add alt="" it will not show corrupt thumbnail and any alt message(without using js)

<img src="pic_trulli.jpg" alt=""/>

If you want to hide the broken one just add alt="" & onerror="this.style.display='none'" it will not show corrupt thumbnail and any alt message(with js)

<img src="pic_trulli.jpg" alt="abc" onerror="this.style.display='none'"/>

4th one is a little dangerous(not exactly) , if you want to add any image in onerror event, it will not display even if Image exist as style.display is like adding. So, use it when you don't require any alternative image to display.

display: 'none'; // in css

If we give it in CSS, then the item will not display(like image, iframe, div like that).

If you want to display image & you want to display totally blank space if error, then you can use, but also be careful this will not take any space. So, you need to keep it in a div may be

Link https://jsfiddle.net/02d9yshw/

Mathildemathis answered 9/5, 2019 at 6:50 Comment(6)
YES! Just add alt=""! That is literally it! Thank you. So glad i scrolled to the bottom of the page. I'm using lazy loading, and in-frame images that haven't loaded yet (because the browser mistakenly thinks the viewport hasn't scrolled to them yet) showed as broken images. A little scroll, and they reappear. The broken images in their place were so ugly thoughDepurate
getting rid of alt will hurt your SEO if that is important to you. img { color: transparent; } will hide the alt without alt="" so Google will still see the alt tag and you won't get dinged SEO wiseEgotist
This won't work if your image has set dimensions via width and height.Unblessed
@RobinMétral, in that case last approach works, css style none. <img src="pic_trulli.jpg" width="500" height="333" onerror="this.style.display='none'"/> . Please remove downvote if it solves your issueMathildemathis
That's right, this is equivalent to the top answer–it still doesn't solve my use case though, since I still need the image border to be visible, not hide it completely. Could you edit your answer to mention that the alt="" only works for images without set dimensions? (and obviously only for presentational images, otherwise alt is fundamental for accessibility)?Unblessed
I feel in that case you could use bootstrap class="img-thumbnail", will just let you have a border box of the desired widthReversion
K
67

I think the easiest way is to hide the broken image icon by the text-indent property.

img {
    text-indent: -10000px
}

Obviously it doesn't work if you want to see the "alt" attribute.

Kerbela answered 19/5, 2016 at 21:46 Comment(6)
The easiest way.Stitt
Hacky CSS is best CSSImamate
What if you want to show the alt text but not the broken document icon ?Kleist
This was very helpful, except in the case in which the image have defined boundaries (width & height), in this case this doesn't work.Mountebank
I thought we were done with this around 2012? "But despite its enduring popularity, Phark has drawbacks of its own: chiefly, a performance hit caused by the need to draw a giant 9999px box offscreen. (Yes, the browser really does this.)" zeldman.com/2012/03/01/…Orford
Future human from 2100 here. This method doesn't work on my 36K screen. I think you should... add a zero or so.Aryan
A
32

in case you like to keep/need the image as a placeholder, you could change the opacity to 0 with an onerror and some CSS to set the image size. This way you will not see the broken link, but the page loads as normal.

<img src="<your-image-link->" onerror="this.style.opacity='0'" />

img {
    width: 75px;
    height: 100px;
}
Aixenprovence answered 11/2, 2018 at 1:34 Comment(2)
@adrianp can you share the link with deprecated information (list) please thanks. It still seems to work fine with style options. Btw no deprecation message on w3schools.com/jsref/event_onerror.asp Normally they update with a red message "is deprecated ...."Aixenprovence
its been marked as deprecated on mdn, see table developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/web/html/element/…Kickoff
B
20

I liked the answer by Nick and was playing around with this solution. Found a cleaner method. Since ::before/::after pseudos don't work on replaced elements like img and object they will only work if the object data (src) is not loaded. It keeps the HTML more clean and will only add the pseudo if the object fails to load.

object {
  position: relative;
  float: left;
  display: block;
  width: 200px;
  height: 200px;
  margin-right: 20px;
  border: 1px solid black;
}
object::after {
  position: absolute;
  top: 0;
  left: 0;
  display: block;
  width: 100%;
  height: 100%;
  content: '';
  background: red url("https://placekitten.com/g/200/200");
}
<object data="https://placekitten.com/200/200" type="image/png"></object>

<object data="http://broken.img/url" type="image/png"></object>
Blackpool answered 3/10, 2015 at 22:41 Comment(1)
instead of empty content, one can make use of an alt-Text (just like with <img>) and get to see it withcontent: attr(alt);, styling the ::after-bracket as display: flex; justify-content: center, …, still has the benefit of avoiding the 'classic' broken-image-icon… or <title>-tag, not sure what is considered more “barrier free”…Heathendom
A
17

If you need to still have the image container visible due to it being filled in later on and don't want to bother with showing and hiding it you can stick a 1x1 transparent image inside of the src:

<img id="active-image" src=""/>

I used this for this exact purpose. I had an image container that was going to have an image loaded into it via Ajax. Because the image was large and took a bit to load, it required setting a background-image in CSS of a Gif loading bar.

However, because the src of the was empty, the broken image icon still appeared in browsers that use it.

Setting the transparent 1x1 Gif fixes this problem simply and effectively with no code additions through CSS or JavaScript.

Alba answered 24/7, 2015 at 20:36 Comment(3)
only answer that worked all others left a white outlineHenn
The best sollution for me. Can you give some resource how create something like this by own?Rabb
nice solution. no need to do so complex things....Villose
P
12

Using CSS only is tough, but you could use CSS's background-image instead of <img> tags...

Something like this:

HTML

<div id="image"></div>

CSS

#image {
    background-image: url(Error.src);
    width: //width of image;
    height: //height of image;

}

Here is a working fiddle.

Note: I added the border in the CSS on the fiddle just to demonstrate where the image would be.

Panthea answered 26/2, 2014 at 19:48 Comment(2)
It's good, but this solution not for me :) img tag hided then src is broken, div - no :(Mirza
@GeraySuinov Then you might have to use JavascriptPanthea
P
12

The same idea as described by others works in React as follow:

<img src='YOUR-URL' onError={(e) => e.target.style.display='none' }/>
Pfister answered 10/7, 2020 at 21:19 Comment(0)
B
5

Since 2005, Mozilla browsers such as Firefox have supported the non-standard :-moz-broken CSS pseudo-class that can accomplish exactly this request:

/* for display purposes so you can see the empty cell */
td { min-width:64px; }

img:-moz-broken { display:none; }
img[src="error"]:-moz-broken { display:initial; } /* for demo purposes */
<table border="1"><tr><td>
  <img src="error">
</td><td>
  <img src="error" alt="error image">
</td><td>
  <img src="error" alt="">
</td><td>
  <img src="broken" alt="broken image">
</td><td>
  <img src="broken" alt="">
</td><td>
  <img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/Mkdgc.png"
   alt="A bird" style="width: 120px">
</td></tr></table>

There are several cells in this example. From left to right:

  1. A broken image without alt attribute (baseline): show a broken image
  2. A broken image with alt text (baseline): show the alt text
  3. A broken image with empty alt text (baseline): show the alt text (nothing)
  4. A broken image with alt text (our CSS): hide the broken image
  5. A broken image with empty alt text (our CSS): show the alt text (nothing)
  6. A functional image with alt text (our CSS): show the image

img::before also works in Firefox 64 (though once upon a time it was img::after so this is not reliable). I can't get either of those to work in Chrome 71.

The most compatible solution would be to specify alt="" and to use the Firefox-specific CSS.

Note that a broken image with an empty alt attribute doesn't guarantee the broken image icon will be suppressed, but that does seem to be the behavior in Firefox 103 and Chromium 103. Also note that this violates accessibility guidelines since screen readers will not be able to describe items with empty alt text and that may be disruptive to blind users' experiences.

Brandibrandice answered 19/12, 2018 at 0:8 Comment(6)
Interesting ... do you know if Chrome has a similar pseudo-class?Attorn
@Attorn – I couldn't find one when I made that answer and can't find one now, at least with quick web queries and by looking at mozilla bug 11011. You could actually request such a thing in Chromium (the upstream for Chrome) if you want, but as it's nonstandard, there's no assurance they'll do it.Brandibrandice
I highly doubt they will do it in short time, taking into consideration that they had a hard time dealing with some nasty bugs I've reported there ... No matter the fact that built-in pseudo-classes like this one will remove from frameworks a lot of JS code written for the same reasonAttorn
Tested on Firefox 104.0.2, this will work if your <img> tag contain alt="" attribute. At least required empty alt="" attribute.Terris
@Terris – I only made the example depend on the alt attribute so I could demonstrate the differences. Since that was confusing, I've reworked the example to no longer depend on attributes.Brandibrandice
@AdamKatz It's OK. I'm just add additional info in my comment to your previous code to confirm that it work but required alt attribute. However I'm up voted.Terris
L
4

Use the object tag. Add alternative text between the tags like this:

<object data="img/failedToLoad.png" type="image/png">Alternative Text</object>

http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_object.asp

Lavinialavinie answered 28/7, 2016 at 9:15 Comment(1)
This will not work for Mandrill emailsBellbella
P
4

You can follow this path as a css solution

img {
        width:200px;
        height:200px;
        position:relative
   }
img:after {
        content: "";
        position: absolute;
        top: 0;
        left: 0;
        width: inherit;
        height: inherit;
        background: #ebebeb url('http://via.placeholder.com/300?text=PlaceHolder') no-repeat center;
        color: transparent;
    }
<img src="gdfgd.jpg">
Polyhymnia answered 28/12, 2017 at 11:6 Comment(1)
First I was thinking that this is a nice solution but this is not working on IE. Also not when adding display block in the after cssAdelaideadelaja
A
2

You can use before and after as a style to prevent the broken image.

<img src="Error.src">

img:before {
  content: url("image.jpg");
}

img:after {
  content: "(url: " attr(src) ")";
}

In this case, if the image in the src is broken, it will use the before content, and if there is no error it will use the src.

Anastase answered 20/5, 2021 at 0:12 Comment(0)
E
1

Missing images will either just display nothing, or display a [ ? ] style box when their source cannot be found. Instead you may want to replace that with a "missing image" graphic that you are sure exists so there is better visual feedback that something is wrong. Or, you might want to hide it entirely. This is possible, because images that a browser can't find fire off an "error" JavaScript event we can watch for.

    //Replace source
    $('img').error(function(){
            $(this).attr('src', 'missing.png');
    });

   //Or, hide them
   $("img").error(function(){
           $(this).hide();
   });

Additionally, you may wish to trigger some kind of Ajax action to send an email to a site admin when this occurs.

Exemplification answered 1/11, 2016 at 6:13 Comment(0)
D
1

The trick with img::after is a good stuff, but has at least 2 downsides:

  1. not supported by all browsers (e.g. doesn't work on Edge https://codepen.io/dsheiko/pen/VgYErm)
  2. you cannot simply hide the image, you cover it - so not that helpful when you what to show a default image in the case

I do not know an universal solution without JavaScript, but for Firefox only there is a nice one:

img:-moz-broken{
  opacity: 0;
}
Determinism answered 23/1, 2019 at 11:24 Comment(0)
M
1

edit: doesn't actually solve the asked issue, but might still be useful.

This is what I did with SASS/SCSS. I have utility scss file that contains this mixin:

  @mixin fallback() {
    background-image: url('/assets/imgs/fallback.png');
    background-size: cover;
    background-repeat: no-repeat;
    background-position-x: center;
    background-position-y: center;
  }

Its usage in .scss

img {
  // ...
  @include fallback();
}
Metritis answered 22/3, 2021 at 11:8 Comment(0)
F
1

I'm going to build on others' answers. Instead of hiding the tag (which may have important styling), feed it a dummy image:

<img src="nonexistent.png" onerror="this.src=`data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'></svg>`;"/>
Foulmouthed answered 29/3, 2022 at 18:42 Comment(0)
G
0

In theory:

Strictly "css only", we have no clean options. See other answers, I have nothing to add.

In practice:

I'd say adding a class on error event is the best way to go. Here's what I mean - and there were answers almost like this, the principle is the same, it's just more elegant if you don't add the style declarations directly. Instead, add a class that can be targeted later:

   <img src="..." onerror="this.classList.add('notfound')">

And NOW you can style the hell out of it, using img.notfound as selector. You can make it a habit to add this little fragment to all your images; won't hurt anything until you style it.


Side note, before anyone comments "this is not a css-only solution": yes, thank you captain, indeed it's not. I'm trying to help with the problem itself, a problem many may have, instead of just looking at the exact wording.

Gracchus answered 23/8, 2022 at 23:13 Comment(0)
T
0

This is an old question but here is something that works, the main trick here is never set a fixed height and width on the image i only use percentage.

.example {
  background-color: #e7e7e7;
  padding: 25px;
}

.image-box {
  height: 50px;
  width: 50px;
  border-radius: 8px;
  background-color: rgb(241, 255, 255);
  color: rgb(241, 245, 249);
  overflow: hidden;
  display: block;
  position: relative;
}

.image {
  display: block;
  max-width: 100%;
  height: 100%;
  object-fit: cover;
}
<div class="example">
  <span class="image-box">
    <img class="image" src="/broken.jpeg" alt>
  </span>
</div>
Threedecker answered 9/1, 2023 at 7:52 Comment(0)
H
-1

Angular way of hiding the broken image.

Inside Html file

<img *ngIf="showImage" [src]="url" (error)="showImage = false">

Inside Ts file

public showImage = true;
Haupt answered 5/7, 2022 at 12:9 Comment(0)
C
-3

Hide image alt with this

img {
   color: transparent;
}
Cookhouse answered 6/6, 2022 at 11:16 Comment(0)
N
-4

A basic and very simple way of doing this without any code required would be to just provide an empty alt statement. The browser will then return the image as blank. It would look just like if the image isn't there.

Example:

<img class="img_gal" alt="" src="awesome.jpg">

Try it out to see! ;)

Nabalas answered 13/4, 2015 at 2:46 Comment(3)
That depends on the browser. In Chrome you will still also have the image border and broken image icon in addition to the (here empty) alt text.Deina
If the image is decorational and not imperative to the content an empty alt is fine. In fact it is recommended over no alt at all. Otherwise, this is highly unadvisable. A broken image is an image that cannot be seen, but if it has an alt tag it can still at least be heard. If you take away the alt tag, it can't be seen OR heard.Advertisement
@Deina I tested the solution and it seems like Chrome changed its behaviour. It won't render the broken image icon if alt="". The same goes for Firefox.Dropsy
U
-5

For future googlers, in 2016 there is a browser safe pure CSS way of hiding empty images using the attribute selector:

img[src="Error.src"] {
    display: none;
}

Edit: I'm back - for future googlers, in 2019 there is a way to style the actual alt text and alt text image in the Shadow Dom, but it only works in developer tools. So you can't use it. Sorry. It would be so nice.

#alttext-container {
    opacity: 0;
}
#alttext-image {
    opacity: 0;
}
#alttext {
    opacity: 0;
}
Unciform answered 2/12, 2016 at 1:19 Comment(1)
img[src=''] { display: none; } This became relevant again with eBay html only templatesUnderrate

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.