What are alternatives to generic collections for COM Interop?
Asked Answered
I

4

11

I am attempting to return a collection of departments from a .NET assembly to be consumed by ASP via COM Interop. Using .NET I would just return a generic collection, e.g. List<Department>, but it seems that generics don't work well with COM Interop. So, what are my options?

I would like to both iterate over the list and be able to access an item by index. Should I inherit from List<Department>, implement an IList, IList<Department> or another interface, or is there a better way? Ideally I would prefer not to have to implement a custom collection for every type of list I need. Also, will List[index] even work with COM Interop?

Thanks, Mike

Example .NET components (C#):

public class Department {
    public string Code { get; private set; }
    public string Name { get; private set; }
    // ...
}

public class MyLibrary {
    public List<Department> GetDepartments() {
        // return a list of Departments from the database
    }
}

Example ASP code:

<%
Function PrintDepartments(departments)
    Dim department
    For Each department In departments
        Response.Write(department.Code & ": " & department.Name & "<br />")
    Next
End Function

Dim myLibrary, departments
Set myLibrary = Server.CreateObject("MyAssembly.MyLibrary")
Set departments = myLibrary.GetDepartments()
%>
<h1>Departments</h1>
<% Call PrintDepartments(departments) %>
<h1>The third department</h1>
<%= departments(2).Name %>

Related questions:

Ignominy answered 6/11, 2008 at 17:43 Comment(0)
I
12

After some more research and trial-and-error, I think I found a solution by using System.Collections.ArrayList. However, this does not work with getting a value by index. To do so, I created a new class ComArrayList that inherits from ArrayList and adds new methods GetByIndex and SetByIndex.

COM Interop compatible collection:

public class ComArrayList : System.Collections.ArrayList {
    public virtual object GetByIndex(int index) {
        return base[index];
    }

    public virtual void SetByIndex(int index, object value) {
        base[index] = value;
    }
}

Updated .NET component MyLibrary.GetDepartments:

public ComArrayList GetDepartments() {
    // return a list of Departments from the database
}

Updated ASP:

<h1>The third department</h1>
<%= departments.GetByIndex(2).Name %>
Ignominy answered 6/11, 2008 at 19:53 Comment(0)
L
5

Since you are only consuming the data in ASP, I would suggest returning Department[]. This should map directly to a SAFEARRAY in COM. It supports enumeration and indexed access too.

public Department[] GetDepartments() {
    var departments = new List<Department>();
    // populate list from database
    return departments.ToArray();
}
Llano answered 7/12, 2009 at 15:7 Comment(0)
D
1

In your ASP code, could you not do this?

<h1>The third department</h1>
<%= departments.Item(2).Name %>

I know that in VB .NET, C# indexers are supported via the "Item" property, so the same idea may work in ASP.

Dogtired answered 8/1, 2011 at 1:25 Comment(0)
O
1

I've been trying to address this same problem in vb.net (not fluent in C#).

Since List(Of T) supports the IList interface, for the COM interface for my objects I have tried specifying

Public Class MyClass
...
   Private _MyList As List(of MyObject)
   Public ReadOnly Property MyList As IList Implements IMyClass.MyList
    Get
        Return _MyList
    End Get
   End Property

and then specifying in the Public Interface that COM sees

ReadOnly Property MyList As IList

This seems to work fine from a classic ASP client that instantiates the object, calls a generator function and then reads MyList property like an array.

Oppression answered 20/2, 2012 at 14:35 Comment(0)

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.