How to ensure data consistency in Cassandra on different tables?
Asked Answered
P

2

12

I'm new in Cassandra and I've read that Cassandra encourages denormalization and duplication of data. This leaves me a little confused. Let us imagine the following scenario:

I have a keyspace with four tables: A,B,C and D.

CREATE TABLE A (
  tableID int,
  column1 int,
  column2 varchar,
  column3 varchar,
  column4 varchar,
  column5 varchar,
  PRIMARY KEY (column1, tableID)
);

Let us imagine that the other tables (B,C,D) have the same structure and the same data that table A, only with a different primary key, in order to respond to other queries.

If I upgrade a row in table A how I can ensure consistency of data in other tables that have the same data?

Peterpeterborough answered 11/12, 2015 at 20:8 Comment(0)
B
7

Cassandra provides BATCH for this purpose. From the documentation:

A BATCH statement combines multiple data modification language (DML) statements (INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE) into a single logical operation, and sets a client-supplied timestamp for all columns written by the statements in the batch. Batching multiple statements can save network exchanges between the client/server and server coordinator/replicas. However, because of the distributed nature of Cassandra, spread requests across nearby nodes as much as possible to optimize performance. Using batches to optimize performance is usually not successful, as described in Using and misusing batches section. For information about the fastest way to load data, see "Cassandra: Batch loading without the Batch keyword."

Batches are atomic by default. In the context of a Cassandra batch operation, atomic means that if any of the batch succeeds, all of it will. To achieve atomicity, Cassandra first writes the serialized batch to the batchlog system table that consumes the serialized batch as blob data. When the rows in the batch have been successfully written and persisted (or hinted) the batchlog data is removed. There is a performance penalty for atomicity. If you do not want to incur this penalty, prevent Cassandra from writing to the batchlog system by using the UNLOGGED option: BEGIN UNLOGGED BATCH

UNLOGGED BATCH is almost always undesirable and I believe is removed in future versions. Normal batches provide the functionality you desire.

Balikpapan answered 12/12, 2015 at 2:37 Comment(0)
I
2

You can also explore a new feature from Cassandra 3.0 called materialized views:

Basic rules of data modeling in Cassandra involve manually denormalizing data into separate tables based on the queries that will be run against that table. Currently, the only way to query a column without specifying the partition key is to use secondary indexes, but they are not a substitute for the denormalization of data into new tables as they are not fit for high cardinality data. High cardinality secondary index queries often require responses from all of the nodes in the ring, which adds latency to each request. Instead, client-side denormalization and multiple independent tables are used, which means that the same code is rewritten for many different users.

In 3.0, Cassandra will introduce a new feature called Materialized Views. Materialized views handle automated server-side denormalization, removing the need for client side handling of this denormalization and ensuring eventual consistency between the base and view data. This denormalization allows for very fast lookups of data in each view using the normal Cassandra read path.

The idea is exactly the same as suggested by Jeff Jirsa, but it won't require you to handle all the multi-table consistency logic inside your application, Cassandra will do it for you automatically.

Intinction answered 15/12, 2015 at 11:14 Comment(2)
Take care when going down this road though, because materialized views are updated asynchronously, meaning that your application would need to be able to handle eventual consistency. The batching approach can let you ensure better consistency for this type of problem, at the expense of application complexity.Unleavened
MV seems not a good idea mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg11511.htmlZiagos

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.