Do I need stax-api-1.0.x in my web app when using JDK 1.6?
Asked Answered
C

2

12

I am currently developing a web app that uses Jersey for REST. I use maven, and both stax-api-1.0.1 and 1.0.2 are pulled into my web-inf/lib. I thought the stax api were a aprt of JDK1.6?

Why are those JARS included in my web application?

Here is my pom.xml

<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
         xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd">
    <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
    <groupId>com.glennbech</groupId>
    <artifactId>simplerest</artifactId>
    <packaging>war</packaging>
    <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
    <name>Simplerest Maven Webapp. Very simple REST.</name>
    <url>http://maven.apache.org</url>
    <dependencies>
        <!-- Jersey for REST -->
        <dependency>
            <groupId>com.sun.jersey</groupId>
            <artifactId>jersey-server</artifactId>
            <version>1.9</version>
        </dependency>

        <dependency>
            <groupId>com.sun.jersey</groupId>
            <artifactId>jersey-json</artifactId>
            <version>1.9</version>
        </dependency>

        <dependency>
            <groupId>mysql</groupId>
            <artifactId>mysql-connector-java</artifactId>
            <version>5.1.17</version>
        </dependency>
    </dependencies>
    <build>
        <finalName>simplerest</finalName>
        <plugins>
            <plugin>
                <groupId>org.mortbay.jetty</groupId>
                <artifactId>maven-jetty-plugin</artifactId>
                <version>6.1.25</version>
                <configuration>
                    <contextPath>/</contextPath>
                    <scanIntervalSeconds>5</scanIntervalSeconds>
                </configuration>
            </plugin>
        </plugins>

</build>

Columbia answered 10/9, 2011 at 19:24 Comment(6)
Can you post your pom.xml? This depends (hur hur) on your dependencies.Calefacient
I posted my pom.xml, but my question is really why I would need the Stax-api jars in my web-inf lib. I thought stax was part of JDK1.6?Columbia
stax does come included in Java 1.6, but Maven does not know you are deploying your app to a Java 1.6 runtime. Nor do your dependencies know what runtime you are using. In fact, they may have been specifically written themselves to work with Java 1.5 or even earlier.Calefacient
I see. Thanks. So, I should probably try to fix this using maven exclusions?Columbia
Yeah, that would be the easiest solution IMO. A next step could be to create different profiles for different target runtimes. E.g. a "1.6" profile would exclude stax etc, but a "1.5" profile would leave them in.Calefacient
@Paul grime Would you mind removing the comment and provide an answer to this question? I'd be glad to accept it.Columbia
U
10

This question was answered in the comment field of the question. Kudos to Paul Grime.

stax does come included in Java 1.6, but Maven does not know you are deploying your app to a Java 1.6 runtime. Nor do your dependencies know what runtime you are using. In fact, they may have been specifically written themselves to work with Java 1.5 or even earlier.

Yeah, [fixing it using maven exclusions] would be the easiest solution IMO. A next step could be to create different profiles for different target runtimes. E.g. a "1.6" profile would exclude stax etc, but a "1.5" profile would leave them in.

Underprivileged answered 10/9, 2011 at 19:24 Comment(0)
C
5
<dependency>
  <groupId>the.thing.that</groupId>
  <artifactId>transitively-imports</artifactId>
  <version>the.stax.version</version>
  <exclusions>
    <!--  STAX comes with Java 1.6 -->
    <exclusion>
        <artifactId>stax-api</artifactId>
        <groupId>javax.xml.stream</groupId>
    </exclusion>
    <exclusion>
        <artifactId>stax-api</artifactId>
        <groupId>stax</groupId>
    </exclusion>
  </exclusions>
<dependency>
Cassidy answered 7/2, 2012 at 1:9 Comment(0)

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.