I need to design a class where one property name has to be return
, but when I create a property name like return
then I get an error.
After some research I found out that one can use a reserved keyword as a property or variable name by adding a @
prefix in C#, or by enclosing it in square brackets []
in VB.NET. For example:
var @class = new object();
So here is my class design code.
public class Person
{
string _retVal;
public string @return
{
get { return _retVal; }
set { _retVal = value; }
}
}
...
Person p = new Person();
p.@return = "hello";
Now I am not getting any error, but when I try to access property name like return
then I need to write the name like @return
, which I don't want. I want to access the property name like p.return = "hello";
instead of p.@return = "hello";
so I'd like to know if there is any way to do that?
result
instead ofreturn
. Variable choice is your freedom. – PublicnessReturn
you would also need to flag the assembly as non CLS compliant.. – PuncheonReturn
myself if I worked on a library. But if it's just some small c# program which won't ever be called by anything else, and one insists onReturn
, who cares. Still, good point. – Betel