Maybe this class instead of StringResponse:
public class NetworkResponseRequest extends Request<NetworkResponse> {
private final Response.Listener<NetworkResponse> mListener;
public NetworkResponseRequest(int method, String url, Response.Listener<NetworkResponse> listener,
Response.ErrorListener errorListener) {
super(method, url, errorListener);
mListener = listener;
}
public NetworkResponseRequest(String url, Response.Listener<NetworkResponse> listener, Response.ErrorListener errorListener) {
this(Method.GET, url, listener, errorListener);
}
@Override
protected void deliverResponse(NetworkResponse response) {
mListener.onResponse(response);
}
@Override
protected Response<NetworkResponse> parseNetworkResponse(NetworkResponse response) {
return Response.success(response, HttpHeaderParser.parseCacheHeaders(response));
}
public static String parseToString(NetworkResponse response) {
String parsed;
try {
parsed = new String(response.data, HttpHeaderParser.parseCharset(response.headers));
} catch (UnsupportedEncodingException e) {
parsed = new String(response.data);
}
return parsed;
}
}
Usage:
NetworkResponseRequest request = new NetworkResponseRequest(Request.Method.GET, "http://example.com/test.php",
new Response.Listener<NetworkResponse>() {
@Override
public void onResponse(NetworkResponse response) {
// This is status code: response.statusCode
// This is string response: NetworkResponseRequest.parseToString(response)
}
}, new Response.ErrorListener() {
@Override
public void onErrorResponse(VolleyError error) {
}
}
);
It is not nice to use my own implementation instead of StringRequest. What do you think about it ?