I had to solve this exact problem a few years ago. I wasn't able to come up with my own solution, but instead ran across this wonderful piece of code which involves clever and judicious use of map
along with recursion:
#!/usr/bin/perl
print "permute:\n";
print "[", join(", ", @$_), "]\n" for permute([1,2,3], [4,5,6], [7,8,9]);
sub permute {
my $last = pop @_;
unless(@_) {
return map([$_], @$last);
}
return map {
my $left = $_;
map([@$left, $_], @$last)
}
permute(@_);
}
Yes, this looks crazy, but allow me to explain! The function will recurse until @_
is empty, at which point it returns ([1], [2], [3])
(a list of three arrayrefs) to the previous level of recursion. At that level $last
is a reference to an array that contains [4, 5, 6]
.
The body of the outer map is then run three times with $_
set to [1]
, then [2]
and finally [3]
. The inner map is then run over (4, 5, 6)
for each iteration of the outer map and this returns ([1, 4], [1, 5], [1, 6])
, ([2, 4], [2, 5], [2, 6])
, and finally ([3, 4], [3, 5], [3, 6])
.
The last but one recursive call then returns ([1, 4], [1, 5], [1, 6], [2, 4], [2, 5], [2, 6], [3, 4], [3, 5], [3, 6])
.
Then, it runs that result against [7,8,9]
, which gives you [1, 4, 7], [1, 4, 8], [1, 4, 9], [1, 5, 7], [1, 5, 8], [1, 5, 9], [1, 6, 7], [1, 6, 8], [1, 6, 9], [2, 4, 7], [2, 4, 8], [2, 4, 9], [2, 5, 7], [2, 5, 8], [2, 5, 9], [2, 6, 7], [2, 6, 8], [2, 6, 9], [3, 4, 7], [3, 4, 8], [3, 4, 9], [3, 5, 7], [3, 5, 8], [3, 5, 9], [3, 6, 7], [3, 6, 8], [3, 6, 9]
I remember posting a question on perlmonks.org asking someone to explain this to me.
You can easily adapt this solution to your problem.
Math::Cartesian::Product
on that duplicate though. – Sailesh