Using a regex_iterator on an istream
Asked Answered
E

2

5

I want to be able to solve problems like this: Getting std :: ifstream to handle LF, CR, and CRLF? where an istream needs to be tokenized by a complex delimiter; such that the only way to tokenize the istream is to:

  1. Read it in the istream a character at a time
  2. Collect the characters
  3. When a delimiter is hit return the collection as a token

Regexes are very good at tokenizing strings with complex delimiters:

string foo{ "A\nB\rC\n\r" };
vector<string> bar;

// This puts {"A", "B", "C"} into bar
transform(sregex_iterator(foo.cbegin(), foo.cend(), regex("(.*)(?:\n\r?|\r)")), sregex_iterator(), back_inserter(bar), [](const smatch& i){ return i[1].str(); });

But I can't use a regex_iterator on a istream :( My solution has been to slurp the istream and then run the regex_iterator over it, but the slurping step seems superfluous.

Is there an unholy combination of istream_iterator and regex_iterator out there somewhere, or if I want it do I have to write it myself?

Escallop answered 27/4, 2015 at 12:16 Comment(0)
E
3

This question is about code appearance:

  1. Since we know that a regex will work 1 character at a time, this question is asking to use a library to parse the istream 1 character at a time rather than internally reading and parsing the istream 1 character at a time
  2. Since parsing an istream 1 character at a time will still copy that one character to a temp variable (buffer) this code seeks to avoid buffering all the code internally, depending on a library instead to abstract that

C++11's regexes use ECMA-262 which does not support look aheads or look behinds: https://mcmap.net/q/701511/-using-regex-lookbehinds-in-c-11 This means that a regex could match using only an input_iterator_tag, but clearly those implemented in C++11 do not.

boost::regex_iterator on the other hand does support the boost::match_partial flag (which is not available in C++11 regex flags.) boost::match_partial allows the user to slurp part of the file and run the regex over that, on a mismatch due to end of input the regex will "hold it's finger" at that position in the regex and await more being added to the buffer. You can see an example here: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_55_0/libs/regex/doc/html/boost_regex/partial_matches.html In the average case, like "A\nB\rC\n\r", this can save buffer size.

boost::match_partial has 4 drawbacks:

  1. In the worst case, like "ABC\n" this saves the user no size and he must slurp the whole istream
  2. If the programmer can guess a buffer size that is too large, that is it contains the delimiter and a significant amount more, the benefits of the reduction in buffer size are squandered
  3. Any time the buffer size selected is too small, additional computations will be required compared to the slurping of the entire file, therefore this method excels in a delimiter-dense string
  4. The inclusion of boost always causes bloat

Circling back to answer the question: A standard library regex_iterator cannot operate on an input_iterator_tag, slurping of the whole istream required. A boost::regex_iterator allows the user to possibly slurp less than the whole istream. Because this is a question about code appearance though, and because boost::regex_iterator's worst case requires slurping of the whole file anyway, it is not a good answer to this question.

For the best code appearance slurping the whole file and running a standard regex_iterator over it is your best bet.

Escallop answered 28/4, 2015 at 12:7 Comment(1)
"C++11's regexes use ECMA-262 which does not support look aheads or look behinds". It indeed doesn't support look behinds but C++ do support look aheads : en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/regex/ecmascript.Warty
M
1

I think not. istream_iterator has the input_iterator_tag tag, whereas regex_iterator expects to be initialized using bi-directional iterators (bidirectional_iterator_tag).

If your delimiter regex is complex enough to avoid reading the stream yourself, the best way to do this is to indeed slurp the istream.

Marder answered 27/4, 2015 at 12:58 Comment(0)

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.