I ended up with a big data.table and I have to do operations per row. (yes... I know that this is clearly not what data.table are for)
R) set.seed(1)
R) DT=data.table(matrix(rnorm(100),nrow=10))
R) DT[,c('a','b'):=list(1:10,2:11)]
R) DT
V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 V9 V10 a b
1: -0.6264538107 1.51178116845 0.91897737161 1.35867955153 -0.1645235963 0.3981058804 2.40161776050 0.475509528900 -0.5686687328 -0.5425200310 1 2
2: 0.1836433242 0.38984323641 0.78213630073 -0.10278772734 -0.2533616801 -0.6120263933 -0.03924000273 -0.709946430922 -0.1351786151 1.2078678060 2 3
3: -0.8356286124 -0.62124058054 0.07456498337 0.38767161156 0.6969633754 0.3411196914 0.68973936245 0.610726353489 1.1780869966 1.1604026157 3 4
4: 1.5952808021 -2.21469988718 -1.98935169586 -0.05380504058 0.5566631987 -1.1293630961 0.02800215878 -0.934097631644 -1.5235668004 0.7002136495 4 5
5: 0.3295077718 1.12493091814 0.61982574789 -1.37705955683 -0.6887556945 1.4330237017 -0.74327320888 -1.253633400239 0.5939461876 1.5868334545 5 6
6: -0.8204683841 -0.04493360902 -0.05612873953 -0.41499456330 -0.7074951570 1.9803998985 0.18879229951 0.291446235517 0.3329503712 0.5584864256 6 7
7: 0.4874290524 -0.01619026310 -0.15579550671 -0.39428995371 0.3645819621 -0.3672214765 -1.80495862889 -0.443291873218 1.0630998373 -1.2765922085 7 8
8: 0.7383247051 0.94383621069 -1.47075238390 -0.05931339671 0.7685329245 -1.0441346263 1.46555486156 0.001105351632 -0.3041839236 -0.5732654142 8 9
9: 0.5757813517 0.82122119510 -0.47815005511 1.10002537198 -0.1123462122 0.5697196274 0.15325333821 0.074341324152 0.3700188099 -1.2246126149 9 10
10: -0.3053883872 0.59390132122 0.41794156020 0.76317574846 0.8811077265 -0.1350546039 2.17261167036 -0.589520946188 0.2670987908 -0.4734006364 10 11
Say I want the min
across of all the Vi
columns row by row, I used to use apply
when I was using data.frame
.
apply(DT[,paste0('V',1:10),with=FALSE],FUN=min,MAR=1)
[1] -0.6264538107 -0.7099464309 -0.8356286124 -2.2146998872 -1.3770595568 -0.8204683841 -1.8049586289 -1.4707523839 -1.2246126149 -0.5895209462
So I can update easily.
Ok, now say that I want to update the min
and max
at once (off course this is an example so I took just 2 things but in real life that would be 10...)
f = function(x){return(c(max=max(x),min=min(x)))}
new=apply(DT[,paste0('V',1:10),with=FALSE],FUN=f,MAR=1)
[,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [,7] [,8] [,9] [,10]
max 2.4016177605 1.2078678060 1.1780869966 1.595280802 1.586833455 1.9803998985 1.063099837 1.465554862 1.100025372 2.1726116704
min -0.6264538107 -0.7099464309 -0.8356286124 -2.214699887 -1.377059557 -0.8204683841 -1.804958629 -1.470752384 -1.224612615 -0.5895209462
I would like to write
DT[,rownames(new):=new]
but this does not work, so here are my questions
- Using my method, how can I transform
new
such that I can updateDT
at once ? - Are there some better approach (that would allow me to update multiple columns at once, with the result of a by-row calculation)
EDIT: I found a solution for 1 but that's UGLY, actually It is strange that :=
do not handle matrix
, I am pretty sure it used to be the case
DT[,c('a1','a2'):=data.table(matrix(apply(DT[,paste0('V',1:10),with=FALSE],FUN=f,MAR=1),byrow=T,nrow=10))]
R) DT
V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 V9 V10 a b
1: -0.6264538107 1.51178116845 0.91897737161 1.35867955153 -0.1645235963 0.3981058804 2.40161776050 0.475509528900 -0.5686687328 -0.5425200310 1 2
2: 0.1836433242 0.38984323641 0.78213630073 -0.10278772734 -0.2533616801 -0.6120263933 -0.03924000273 -0.709946430922 -0.1351786151 1.2078678060 2 3
3: -0.8356286124 -0.62124058054 0.07456498337 0.38767161156 0.6969633754 0.3411196914 0.68973936245 0.610726353489 1.1780869966 1.1604026157 3 4
4: 1.5952808021 -2.21469988718 -1.98935169586 -0.05380504058 0.5566631987 -1.1293630961 0.02800215878 -0.934097631644 -1.5235668004 0.7002136495 4 5
5: 0.3295077718 1.12493091814 0.61982574789 -1.37705955683 -0.6887556945 1.4330237017 -0.74327320888 -1.253633400239 0.5939461876 1.5868334545 5 6
6: -0.8204683841 -0.04493360902 -0.05612873953 -0.41499456330 -0.7074951570 1.9803998985 0.18879229951 0.291446235517 0.3329503712 0.5584864256 6 7
7: 0.4874290524 -0.01619026310 -0.15579550671 -0.39428995371 0.3645819621 -0.3672214765 -1.80495862889 -0.443291873218 1.0630998373 -1.2765922085 7 8
8: 0.7383247051 0.94383621069 -1.47075238390 -0.05931339671 0.7685329245 -1.0441346263 1.46555486156 0.001105351632 -0.3041839236 -0.5732654142 8 9
9: 0.5757813517 0.82122119510 -0.47815005511 1.10002537198 -0.1123462122 0.5697196274 0.15325333821 0.074341324152 0.3700188099 -1.2246126149 9 10
10: -0.3053883872 0.59390132122 0.41794156020 0.76317574846 0.8811077265 -0.1350546039 2.17261167036 -0.589520946188 0.2670987908 -0.4734006364 10 11
a1 a2
1: 2.401617761 -0.6264538107
2: 1.207867806 -0.7099464309
3: 1.178086997 -0.8356286124
4: 1.595280802 -2.2146998872
5: 1.586833455 -1.3770595568
6: 1.980399899 -0.8204683841
7: 1.063099837 -1.8049586289
8: 1.465554862 -1.4707523839
9: 1.100025372 -1.2246126149
10: 2.172611670 -0.5895209462
EDIT2: It looks on my data that using DT[, (newColnames):=f(.DT), by=IDX, .SDcols=someIdx]
is much slower than the apply way, is that expected ?
apply
allow much shorter and flexible code. At the end I am more embarassed with thedata.table(matrix(...
part – Gae