I've read the documentation, but I still can't get when I should use one or the other:
According to documentation OffsetDateTime
should be used when writing date to database, but I don't get why.
I've read the documentation, but I still can't get when I should use one or the other:
According to documentation OffsetDateTime
should be used when writing date to database, but I don't get why.
Q: What's the difference between java 8 ZonedDateTime and OffsetDateTime?
The javadocs say this:
"
OffsetDateTime
,ZonedDateTime
andInstant
all store an instant on the time-line to nanosecond precision.Instant
is the simplest, simply representing the instant.OffsetDateTime
adds to the instant the offset from UTC/Greenwich, which allows the local date-time to be obtained.ZonedDateTime
adds full time-zone rules."
Source: https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/time/OffsetDateTime.html
Thus the difference between OffsetDateTime
and ZonedDateTime
is that the latter includes the rules that cover daylight saving time adjustments and various other anomalies.
Stated simply:
Time Zone = ( Offset-From-UTC + Rules-For-Anomalies )
Q: According to documentation
OffsetDateTime
should be used when writing date to database, but I don't get why.
Dates with local time offsets always represent the same instants in time, and therefore have a stable ordering. By contrast, the meaning of dates with full timezone information is unstable in the face of adjustments to the rules for the respective timezones. (And these do happen; e.g. for date-time values in the future.) So if you store and then retrieve a ZonedDateTime
the implementation has a problem:
It can store the computed offset ... and the retrieved object may then have an offset that is inconsistent with the current rules for the zone-id.
It can discard the computed offset ... and the retrieved object then represents a different point in the absolute / universal timeline than the one that was stored.
If you use Java object serialization, the Java 9 implementation takes the first approach. This is arguably the "more correct" way to handle this, but this doesn't appear to be documented. (JDBC drivers and ORM bindings are presumably making similar decisions, and are hopefully getting it right.)
But if you are writing an application that manually stores date/time values, or that rely on java.sql.DateTime
, then dealing with the complications of a zone-id is ... probably something to be avoided. Hence the advice.
Note that dates whose meaning / ordering is unstable over time may be problematic for an application. And since changes to zone rules are an edge case, the problems are liable to emerge at unexpected times.
A (possible) second reason for the advice is that the construction of a ZonedDateTime
is ambiguous at the certain points. For example in the period in time when you are "putting the clocks back", combining a local time and a zone-id can give you two different offsets. The ZonedDateTime
will consistently pick one over the other ... but this isn't always the correct choice.
Now, this could be a problem for any applications that construct ZonedDateTime
values that way. But from the perspective of someone building an enterprise application is a bigger problem when the (possibly incorrect) ZonedDateTime
values are persistent and used later.
The accepted answer give very completed explanation, perhaps below code example can provide you short and clear picture:
Instant instant = Instant.now();
Clock clock = Clock.fixed(instant, ZoneId.of("America/New_York"));
OffsetDateTime offsetDateTime = OffsetDateTime.now(clock);
ZonedDateTime zonedDateTime = ZonedDateTime.now(clock);
System.out.println(offsetDateTime); // 2019-01-03T19:10:16.806-05:00
System.out.println(zonedDateTime); // 2019-01-03T19:10:16.806-05:00[America/New_York]
System.out.println();
OffsetDateTime offsetPlusSixMonths = offsetDateTime.plusMonths(6);
ZonedDateTime zonedDateTimePlusSixMonths = zonedDateTime.plusMonths(6);
System.out.println(offsetPlusSixMonths); // 2019-07-03T19:10:16.806-05:00
System.out.println(zonedDateTimePlusSixMonths); // 2019-07-03T19:10:16.806-04:00[America/New_York]
System.out.println(zonedDateTimePlusSixMonths.toEpochSecond() - offsetPlusSixMonths.toEpochSecond()); // -3600
System.out.println();
System.out.println(zonedDateTimePlusSixMonths.toLocalDateTime()); // 2019-07-03T19:10:16.806
System.out.println(offsetPlusSixMonths.toLocalDateTime()); // 2019-07-03T19:10:16.806
In short, use ZonedDateTime
only if you want to factor in Daylight saving, typically there will be one hour difference, as you can see the example above, the offset of ZonedDateTime
change from -5:00
to -04:00
, in most case, your business logic might end up with bug.
(code copy from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEQhx9hGutQ)
Instant
or ZonedDateTime
. IMO OffsetDateTime
only exist because many existing systems (wrongly) treated "time offset" to be sufficient information about timezones (i.e. they communicate/store/handle just an offset when they should be communicating a time zone name). –
Radiocarbon ZonedDateTime
& ZoneId
. When we store a time event to DB we convert to UTC, OffsetDateTime is basically an instant in time. UTC dates are easy comparable (avoiding TZ info lookups). –
Hettie Apart from programming, I am giving you an example to understand ZonedDateTime
and OffsetDateTime
in the real world.
ZonedDateTime:
let's say I am in Pakistan
now and right now the data and time is 2024-03-07T13:05:00.00000
(13:05 == 01:05 pm), if I add +03:00
the time would be the current time in Thailand
(15:05 == 03:05 pm),
OffsetDateTime:
OffsetDateTime: start by UTC+00:00 and the current time is 2024-03-07T08:05:00.00000
(08:05 am), if I add +03:00
the time would be current time in Saudi Arabia
(11:05 am).
So OffsetDateTime starts from UTC+00:00 and ZonedDateTime starts from your current zone time. please refer attached wiki link
© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.
ZonedDateTime
also contains information about timezones, including DST switching etc from what I read. – Doctrinal