How do I use a custom comparer with the Linq Distinct method?
Asked Answered
C

1

14

I was reading a book about Linq, and saw that the Distinct method has an overload that takes a comparer. This would be a good solution to a problem I have where I want to get the distinct entities from a collection, but want the comparison to be on the entity ID, even if the other properties are different.

According to the book, if I have a Gribulator entity, I should be able to create a comparer like this...

private class GribulatorComparer : IComparer<Gribulator> {
  public int Compare(Gribulator g1, Gribulator g2) {
    return g1.ID.CompareTo(g2.ID);
  }
}

...and then use it like this...

List<Gribulator> distinctGribulators
  = myGribulators.Distinct(new GribulatorComparer()).ToList();

However, this gives the following compiler errors...

'System.Collections.Generic.List' does not contain a definition for 'Distinct' and the best extension method overload 'System.Linq.Enumerable.Distinct(System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable, System.Collections.Generic.IEqualityComparer)' has some invalid arguments

Argument 2: cannot convert from 'LinqPlayground.Program.GribulatorComparer' to 'System.Collections.Generic.IEqualityComparer'

I've searched around a bit, and have seen plenty of examples that use code like this, but no complaints about compiler errors.

What am I doing wrong? Also, is this the best way of doing this? I want a one-off solution here, so don't want to start changing the code for the entity itself. I want the entity to remain as normal, but just in this one place, compare by ID only.

Thanks for any help.

Cythiacyto answered 11/11, 2012 at 14:23 Comment(1)
Forgot to add, I'm using VS2012, and so .NET 4.0 in C#Cythiacyto
N
19

You're implementing your comparer as an IComparer<T>, the LINQ method overload requires an implementation of IEqualityComparer:

private class GribulatorComparer : IEqualityComparer<Gribulator> {
  public bool Equals(Gribulator g1, Gribulator g2) {
    return g1.ID == g2.ID;
  }
}

edit:

For clarification, the IComparer interface can be used for sorting, as that's basically what the Compare() method does.

Like this:

items.OrderBy(x => new ItemComparer());

private class ItemComparer : IComparer<Item>
{
    public int Compare(Item x, Item y)
    {
        return x.Id.CompareTo(y.Id)
    }
}

Which will sort your collection using that comparer, however LINQ provides a way to do that for simple fields (like an int Id).

items.OrderBy(x => x.Id);
Nebulose answered 11/11, 2012 at 14:31 Comment(5)
Thanks Peter, that explains it! The example I was using in the book was for OrderBy, but he had referred to it from where he discussed Distinct, and I hadn't picked up on the fact that I needed a different interface. Wasn't very clear in the book actually :(Cythiacyto
By the way, do you know if there is a way to do this with an anonymous function, instead of having to create a separate class for the comparer? Seems like overkillCythiacyto
As far as I know, there isn't. I've actually been thinking about overloading linq operators with stuff like that.Nebulose
Shame, because for a one-off like my situation, it's overkill to create a whole new class. I've got used to throwing anonymous functions around! Thanks again.Cythiacyto
I think it's worth mentioning that writing a custom IEqualityComparer also requires an implementation of GetHashCode()Baht

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.