Add package dependency for a binary target with Swift Package Manager
Asked Answered
C

1

15

I'm developing a closed source framework that will be distributed as an XCFramework using SPM. This is possible thanks to the new binaryTarget(name:path:) and binaryTarget(name:url:checksum:) methods available in swift tools 5.3. This works fine until the framework has dependencies.

The Binary Frameworks in Swift talk from WWDC 2019 states that "binary frameworks cannot depend on packages" but this was before 5.3 and binary targets were not possible at all. On the Swift forums there is a suggested workaround that basically revolves around adding a dummy target that will list the dependencies (the binaryTarget(...) methods don't have a dependencies parameter).

The workaround works until the dependency has its own dependencies. For example Lottie which doesn't have any dependencies works fine, but Auth0 which has quite a few, fails with errors Missing required modules: 'Auth0ObjectiveC', 'SimpleKeychain'. Even adding Auth0 directly to the client project using SPM doesn't fix these errors.

Here is my Package.swift which works partially.

// swift-tools-version:5.3
import PackageDescription
let package = Package(
    name: "MyFramework",
    platforms: [
        .iOS(.v13)
    ],
    products: [
        .library(name: "MyFramework", targets: ["MyFramework", "MyFramework-Dependencies"])
    ],
    dependencies: [
        .package(name: "Auth0", url: "https://github.com/auth0/Auth0.swift.git", from: "1.30.1")
    ],
    targets: [
        .binaryTarget(name: "MyFramework", path: "MyFramework.xcframework"),
        .target(name: "MyFramework-Dependencies", dependencies: ["Auth0"], path: "MyFramework-Dependencies")
    ])

It it possible to actually have a binary framework depend on a package? If not, what would be the proper way distribute a dependency for a binary framework?

Cherida answered 9/12, 2020 at 16:1 Comment(2)
Did you find an adequate solution to this problem? I am wondering the same.Ratepayer
@Ratepayer we've extracted the part that relies on these dependencies into a separate standard SPM package, and then request 3rd party developers to inject it into the main framework.Cherida
A
9

We've solved this problem by creating a wrapper target that depends on both the binary framework and other dependencies. See an example here.

Autonomic answered 11/12, 2020 at 16:44 Comment(2)
Sorry for the late response, holidays and vacation. Based on what you posted I've updated Package.swift so that MyFramework has a MyFrameworkTarget target which depends on MyFrameworkWrapper, which depends on Auth0 and MyFrameworkBinary. Importing MyFrameworkTarget doesn't throw any errors, but it doesn't expose anything from MyFrameworkBinary. The same goes if I try to import MyFrameworkWrapper. Importing MyFrameworkBinary throws the same error I posted in the question. Is there a step I'm missing?Cherida
I had face same kind of issue and followed this approach. But still I am getting a build error due to unable to link sub dependency. If someone has an idea why please have a look on my detailed question. #71825420Disabuse

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.