rackspace vs EC2 vs Heroku vs Engine Yard for ruby on rails [closed]
Asked Answered
B

2

15

I have a website I want to launch through either Rackspace, EC2, Heroku or Engine Yard.

I have used Heroku and love how simple it is to get up & running, to push updates, manage my DB, etc. However, to get a hostname based SSL going, I will have to pay 20$. Also, I have no idea as to how much Heroku will cost me: I'm not entirely sure how to gauge how much activity my site will see.

I have a deal where I can get a couple hundred $ of free hosting from Rackspace & EC2, BUT ... will they be as easy as Heroku to deal with? What about Engine Yard? Will all of them make me pay some set amount for my SSL certificate to be properly setup?

Thanks! And please let me know what I can clarify - I am still quite new to the world of launching websites :)

Ringo

Balefire answered 2/1, 2012 at 19:14 Comment(1)
Without stating any opinions, I'll answer the question at hand: Engine Yard does not charge for SSL certificates and does not limit your application to specific domain names.Amalgamate
C
23

Heroku is a fully maintained system - all you as a developer have to worry about is getting your code up and running on the platform. Once that's done you're golden. With services that provide a VPS you have a whole more headaches to worry about. For instance, with EngineYard you have to constantly apply the updates you get coming through, and you also have to think much more about machine setup via the chef recipes that they give you. With Heroku, you simply scale whatever processes you need and you're done.

It comes down to how much you value your time. Personally I use Heroku because it's dead simple, and stays out of the way. Deployment isn't a massive headache for me as it once was.

With regard to cost, the key thing is that you pay what you need to. If you're only seeing low traffic, you'd be fine on one or two dynos, which will cost from nothing to ~$36/mo. As things go up, you pay a little more. There will be a point though where the cost effectiveness of using a system like Heroku(or EngineYard) will cease to be that cost effective, and you'll be looking at your own custom setup, but I dare say that you're some way away from that.

With SSL, you're looking at $20/mo in the current setup at Heroku, although I've heard that this might change for the better. In the grand scale of things, this is extremely cheap. There is no setup fee. With EngineYard there is no SSL cost, but again, you've a number of hoops to jump through before you'll get it working (it's not hard, it just takes time).

Personally, if you're still new to this stuff, I would definitely stick with Heroku for now, as it takes a whole load of worries and concerns away from you and leaves you to focus on building an application. Once you're in a position where you know more about what you want from your hosting you can then make a more educated call on what might fit your particular situation.

Cilia answered 2/1, 2012 at 23:22 Comment(0)
C
2

Rackspace and ec2 just provide for virtual machines. It will be entirely up to you to configure databases, web servers, load balancers etc. a lot more work than heroku.

Engineyard are more like heroku in that they aren't just providing you with servers, they are providing you with a service and set up stuff for you. It's a more traditional service than heroku - you have a bunch of virtual servers allocated to you rather heroku's dyno setup.

I don't think they'd charge for something like setting up an ssl certificate.

Corkscrew answered 2/1, 2012 at 20:9 Comment(1)
Wouldn't agree that Rackspace and EC2 "just provide virtual machines". If you use their full infrastructure you get auto scaling, caching and DAAS (at least for AWS). It may not be as easy to use as Heroku, but it is very flexible.Rolfston

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.