Why does the following example swallow my HTTP-Header for "Content-Encoding" in the request. I am writing an application where I need to decode a custom encoding format. However, I can never get hold of the "Content-Encoding" header from the request. Neither in the actual resource nor in an ReaderInterceptor. In the response, this encoding header is not swallowed.
This behavior can be easily observed in the following (runnable) example:
public class Demo extends JerseyTest {
@Override
protected Application configure() {
enable(TestProperties.DUMP_ENTITY);
enable(TestProperties.LOG_TRAFFIC);
return new ResourceConfig(MyResource.class, MyInterceptor.class);
}
public static final String PATH = "path";
public static final String ENCODING = "my-encoding";
public static final String CUSTOM_HEADER = "X-Content-Encoding";
public static final String QUESTION = "question", ANSWER = "answer";
@Path(PATH)
public static class MyResource {
@POST
public Response handle(String value, @Context HttpHeaders httpHeaders) {
assertEquals(ENCODING, httpHeaders.getHeaderString(CUSTOM_HEADER));
// Here, the "Content-Encoding" header mysteriously disappeared.
assertEquals(ENCODING, httpHeaders.getHeaderString(HttpHeaders.CONTENT_ENCODING));
return Response
.ok(ANSWER)
.header(CUSTOM_HEADER, ENCODING)
.header(HttpHeaders.CONTENT_ENCODING, ENCODING)
.build();
}
}
public static class MyInterceptor implements ReaderInterceptor, WriterInterceptor {
@Override
public Object aroundReadFrom(ReaderInterceptorContext context)
throws IOException, WebApplicationException {
assertEquals(ENCODING, context.getHeaders().getFirst(CUSTOM_HEADER));
// Here, the "Content-Encoding" header mysteriously disappeared.
assertEquals(ENCODING, context.getHeaders().getFirst(HttpHeaders.CONTENT_ENCODING));
return context.proceed();
}
@Override
public void aroundWriteTo(WriterInterceptorContext context)
throws IOException, WebApplicationException {
assertEquals(ENCODING, context.getHeaders().getFirst(CUSTOM_HEADER));
// Here, the "Content-Encoding" header can be found.
assertEquals(ENCODING, context.getHeaders().getFirst(HttpHeaders.CONTENT_ENCODING));
context.proceed();
}
}
@Test
public void test() throws Exception {
Response response = target(PATH)
.request()
.header(CUSTOM_HEADER, ENCODING)
.header(HttpHeaders.CONTENT_ENCODING, ENCODING)
.post(Entity.text(QUESTION));
assertEquals(200, response.getStatus());
assertEquals(ENCODING, response.getHeaders().getFirst(CUSTOM_HEADER));
// Here, the "Content-Encoding" header can be found.
assertEquals(ENCODING, response.getHeaders().getFirst(HttpHeaders.CONTENT_ENCODING));
}
}
Is there some magic happening behind the curtains where Jersey tries to fix up my content encoding? (What it cannot since its a closed-source encoding which I must as a matter of fact resolve by querying another application on another server in the network.) I cannot even discover the "Content-Encoding" header in the request dump which is why I suspect Jersey to not send the header at all.
I could of course use some "X-Content-Encoding" header, this works as demonstrated in the example. But this solution is just dumb. I already searched the various CommonProperties
, ServerProperties
, ClientProperties
constant pools but I did not find a configuration option.
post
method says clearly: Any variant-related HTTP headers previously set (namelyContent-Type
,Content-Language
andContent-Encoding
) will be overwritten using the entity variant information. – Tigre