Is there a "HasNext" method for an IEnumerator?
Asked Answered
C

6

16

With Java Iterators, I have used the hasNext method to determine whether an iteration has more elements (without consuming an element) -- thus, hasNext is like a "Peek" method.

My question: is there anything like a "hasNext" or "Peek" method with C#'s generic IEnumerators?

Conjurer answered 13/8, 2009 at 16:13 Comment(2)
How could you possibly not know? Is it possible you've never seen msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/78dfe2yb.aspx?Prut
Thank you very much for pointing this out, Mr. Saunders.Conjurer
I
19

No, unfortunately there isn't.

The IEnumerator<T> interface only exposes the following members:

Methods:

Dispose
MoveNext
Reset

Properties:

Current

Inland answered 13/8, 2009 at 16:14 Comment(2)
We're taking about IEnumerator, instead of IEnumerable here, right? And * should be on Dispose, instead of MoveNext.Hillie
@Even - Yikes, that post was rife with errors! Thanks for pointing them out.Inland
J
36

No, but in C# you can repeatedly ask for the current element without moving to the next one. It's just a different way of looking at it.

It wouldn't be too hard to write a C# class to take a .NET-style IEnumerator and return a Java-style Iterator. Personally I find the .NET style easier to use in most cases, but there we go :)

EDIT: Okay, this is completely untested, but I think it will work. It does at least compile :)

using System;
using System.Collections;
using System.Collections.Generic;

// // Mimics Java's Iterable<T> interface
public interface IIterable<T>
{
    IIterator<T> Iterator();
}

// Mimics Java's Iterator interface - but
// implements IDisposable for the sake of
// parity with IEnumerator.
public interface IIterator<T> : IDisposable
{
    bool HasNext { get; }
    T Next();
    void Remove();
}

public sealed class EnumerableAdapter<T> : IIterable<T>
{
    private readonly IEnumerable<T> enumerable;

    public EnumerableAdapter(IEnumerable<T> enumerable)
    {
        this.enumerable = enumerable;
    }

    public IIterator<T> Iterator()
    {
        return new EnumeratorAdapter<T>(enumerable.GetEnumerator());
    }
}

public sealed class EnumeratorAdapter<T> : IIterator<T>
{
    private readonly IEnumerator<T> enumerator;

    private bool fetchedNext = false;
    private bool nextAvailable = false;
    private T next;

    public EnumeratorAdapter(IEnumerator<T> enumerator)
    {
        this.enumerator = enumerator;
    }

    public bool HasNext
    {
        get
        {
            CheckNext();
            return nextAvailable;
        } 
    }

    public T Next()
    {
        CheckNext();
        if (!nextAvailable)
        {
            throw new InvalidOperationException();
        }
        fetchedNext = false; // We've consumed this now
        return next;
    }

    void CheckNext()
    {
        if (!fetchedNext)
        {
            nextAvailable = enumerator.MoveNext();
            if (nextAvailable)
            {
                next = enumerator.Current;
            }
            fetchedNext = true;            
        }
    }

    public void Remove()
    {
        throw new NotSupportedException();
    }

    public void Dispose()
    {
        enumerator.Dispose();
    }
}

public sealed class IterableAdapter<T> : IEnumerable<T>
{
    private readonly IIterable<T> iterable;

    public IterableAdapter(IIterable<T> iterable)
    {
        this.iterable = iterable;
    }

    public IEnumerator<T> GetEnumerator()
    {
        return new IteratorAdapter<T>(iterable.Iterator());
    }

    IEnumerator IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()
    {
        return GetEnumerator();
    }
}

public sealed class IteratorAdapter<T> : IEnumerator<T>
{
    private readonly IIterator<T> iterator;

    private bool gotCurrent = false;
    private T current;

    public IteratorAdapter(IIterator<T> iterator)
    {
        this.iterator = iterator;
    }

    public T Current
    {
        get
        {
            if (!gotCurrent)
            {
                throw new InvalidOperationException();
            }
            return current;
        }
    }

    object IEnumerator.Current
    {
        get { return Current; }
    }

    public bool MoveNext()
    {
        gotCurrent = iterator.HasNext;
        if (gotCurrent)
        {
            current = iterator.Next();
        }
        return gotCurrent;
    }

    public void Reset()
    {
        throw new NotSupportedException();
    }

    public void Dispose()
    {
        iterator.Dispose();
    }
}
Jeffereyjefferies answered 13/8, 2009 at 16:20 Comment(7)
(I'm happy to code up the adapter if anyone's interested, but I won't do it otherwise...)Jeffereyjefferies
I'd be interested in seeing it, Jon.Conjurer
Wow, that was fast! Thank you, Jon!Conjurer
@Andrew, it places responsibility a little different. I find the dotNet version easier to work with.Brinna
The major failing of Java's iterators is that they don't have the equivalent of IDisposable, making them impossible to use for anything which might iterator over a resource (e.g. lines in a file).Jeffereyjefferies
Why do you have 4 classes and not just 2? I would think that you just need classes that wrap IEnumerable and IEnumerator. What's the IIterator business for?Lollard
@Eyal: They're just mappings for the Java interfaces. You don't have to have them of course - but using the concrete class here would force you to always use the wrapper, even if occasionally you wanted to implement the Java style directly.Jeffereyjefferies
I
19

No, unfortunately there isn't.

The IEnumerator<T> interface only exposes the following members:

Methods:

Dispose
MoveNext
Reset

Properties:

Current

Inland answered 13/8, 2009 at 16:14 Comment(2)
We're taking about IEnumerator, instead of IEnumerable here, right? And * should be on Dispose, instead of MoveNext.Hillie
@Even - Yikes, that post was rife with errors! Thanks for pointing them out.Inland
C
3

Enumerators are often lazily evaluated so HasNext makes little sense.

Confiding answered 13/8, 2009 at 16:44 Comment(0)
U
2

Nope, just MoveNext, Reset and Current.

Unmarked answered 13/8, 2009 at 16:20 Comment(0)
K
2

You can also try having a look at this Implementing Peek to IEnumerator and IEnumerator<>. It's an extension method that adds the Peek functionality to IEnumerator. Hope it helps. :)

Kitchenware answered 24/8, 2016 at 11:26 Comment(0)
E
0

Use good old manual iteration

        // IEnumerable<>
        for (int i = 0; i < enumerable.Count(); i++)
        {
            var item = enumerable.ElementAt(i);

            if(i + 1 < enumerable.Count()) // eq. Iterator.HasNext
            {
            }
        }

        // IList<>
        for (int i = 0; i < list.Count; i++)
        {
            var item = list[1];

            if (i + 1 < list.Count) // eq. Iterator.HasNext
            {
            }
        }
Epilogue answered 23/4, 2020 at 15:5 Comment(0)

© 2022 - 2025 — McMap. All rights reserved.