How to pass parameters to JavaFX application?
Asked Answered
E

8

18

I am running my JavaFX application like this:

public class MainEntry {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        Controller controller = new Controller();
        Application.launch(MainStage.class);
    }
}

MainStage class extends Appication. Application.launch starts my JavaFX window in a special FX-thread, but in my main method I don't even have an instance of my MainStage class.

How to pass non-String parameter (controller in my case) to MainStage instance? Is it a flawed design?

Ers answered 7/7, 2014 at 13:31 Comment(1)
Why can't you simply instantiate the controller inside your application? Btw. MainStage doesn't seem to be the right naming for your main application as Stage has a different meaning in JavaFX.Oriya
O
4

Usually, there is no need to pass arguments to the main application other than the program arguments passed to your main. The only reason why one wants to do this is to create a reusable Application. But the Application does not need to be reusable, because it is the piece of code that assembles your application. Think of the start method to be the new main!

So instead of writing a reusable Application that gets configured in the main method, the application itself should be the configurator and use reusable components to build up the app in the start method, e.g.:

public class MyApplication extends Application {

    @Override
    public void start(Stage stage) throws Exception {
        // Just on example how it could be done...
        Controller controller = new Controller();
        MyMainComponent mainComponent = new MyMainComponent(controller);
        mainComponent.showIn(stage);
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        Application.launch(args);
    }
}
Oriya answered 10/7, 2014 at 9:29 Comment(3)
"The only reason ... is to create a reusable Application" I think there are other reasons like when you want a non-fx application launch Application (for example fx gui added to existing application). While doing so the non-fx application needs to pass information to the Application.Evidence
@Evidence I disagree. There are two ways to start an fx-application from a non-fx Java application: Either as separate process, or in the same VM. The former does not allow to pass anything but strings/streams anyway, so there is no need to have a richer API there. And if you want to start it in the same VM, you can easily write your own Application class as 'configuration'-wrapper around the reusable UI-component as described in my answer. Of course this does not work if too much work has to be done in the Application class. But this is poor design anyway.Oriya
I am not sure I follow, but I think we agree that there may be a need to pass a reference from a non-fx Java application to an Application. Maybe you can provide a better answer to thisEvidence
W
13

Starting with JavaFX 9 you can trigger the launch of the JavaFX platform "manually" using the public API. The only drawback is that the stop method is not invoked the way it would be in application started via Application.launch:

public class MainEntry {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        Controller controller = new Controller();

        final MainStage mainStage = new MainStage(controller);
        mainStage.init();

        Platform.startup(() -> {
            // create primary stage
            Stage stage = new Stage();

            mainStage.start(stage);
        });
    }
}

The Runnable passed to Platform.startup is invoked on the JavaFX application thread.

Weigel answered 22/9, 2017 at 17:45 Comment(0)
D
8

Here's a nice example I found elsewhere

@Override
public void init () throws Exception
{
  super.init ();

  Parameters parameters = getParameters ();

  Map<String, String> namedParameters = parameters.getNamed ();
  List<String> rawArguments = parameters.getRaw ();
  List<String> unnamedParameters = parameters.getUnnamed ();

  System.out.println ("\nnamedParameters -");
  for (Map.Entry<String, String> entry : namedParameters.entrySet ())
    System.out.println (entry.getKey () + " : " + entry.getValue ());

  System.out.println ("\nrawArguments -");
  for (String raw : rawArguments)
    System.out.println (raw);

  System.out.println ("\nunnamedParameters -");
  for (String unnamed : unnamedParameters)
    System.out.println (unnamed);
}
Dorseydorsiferous answered 8/4, 2015 at 5:13 Comment(0)
O
4

Usually, there is no need to pass arguments to the main application other than the program arguments passed to your main. The only reason why one wants to do this is to create a reusable Application. But the Application does not need to be reusable, because it is the piece of code that assembles your application. Think of the start method to be the new main!

So instead of writing a reusable Application that gets configured in the main method, the application itself should be the configurator and use reusable components to build up the app in the start method, e.g.:

public class MyApplication extends Application {

    @Override
    public void start(Stage stage) throws Exception {
        // Just on example how it could be done...
        Controller controller = new Controller();
        MyMainComponent mainComponent = new MyMainComponent(controller);
        mainComponent.showIn(stage);
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        Application.launch(args);
    }
}
Oriya answered 10/7, 2014 at 9:29 Comment(3)
"The only reason ... is to create a reusable Application" I think there are other reasons like when you want a non-fx application launch Application (for example fx gui added to existing application). While doing so the non-fx application needs to pass information to the Application.Evidence
@Evidence I disagree. There are two ways to start an fx-application from a non-fx Java application: Either as separate process, or in the same VM. The former does not allow to pass anything but strings/streams anyway, so there is no need to have a richer API there. And if you want to start it in the same VM, you can easily write your own Application class as 'configuration'-wrapper around the reusable UI-component as described in my answer. Of course this does not work if too much work has to be done in the Application class. But this is poor design anyway.Oriya
I am not sure I follow, but I think we agree that there may be a need to pass a reference from a non-fx Java application to an Application. Maybe you can provide a better answer to thisEvidence
R
2

The String array passed to the main() method are the parameters of the application, not specifically to the JavaFX module if you arbitrarily choose to use JavaFX.

The easiest solution could be to store the argumets for later use (e.g. static attribute next to the main() method, and a static getter method to access it).

Rhinencephalon answered 7/7, 2014 at 13:37 Comment(0)
G
2

Question - I

I don't even have an instance of my MainStage class !

Solution

Your main method doesn't need an instance of MainStage to call the start() of your MainStage. This job is done automatically by the JavaFX launcher.

From Docs

The entry point for JavaFX applications is the Application class. The JavaFX runtime does the following, in order, whenever an application is launched:

Constructs an instance of the specified Application class

  1. Calls the init() method
  2. Calls the start(javafx.stage.Stage) method
  3. Waits for the application to finish, which happens when either of the following occur: the application calls Platform.exit() the last window has been closed and the implicitExit attribute on Platform is true
  4. Calls the stop() method

and

The Java launcher loads and initializes the specified Application class on the JavaFX Application Thread. If there is no main method in the Application class, or if the main method calls Application.launch(), then an instance of the Application is then constructed on the JavaFX Application Thread.

Question - II

How to pass non-String parameter (controller in my case) to MainStage instance?

Solution

Why do you need to pass non-String parameter to MainStage? If you need an controller object, just fetch it from the FXML

Example

public class MainEntry extends Application {

    @Override
    public void start(Stage stage) throws Exception {
        FXMLLoader loader = new FXMLLoader();
        Pane pane = (Pane) loader.load(getClass().getResourceAsStream("sample.fxml"));
        //Get the controller
        Controller controller = (Controller)loader.getController();
        Scene scene = new Scene(pane, 200, 200);
        stage.setScene(scene);
        stage.show();
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        launch(args);// or launch(MainEntry.class)
    }
}
Gurl answered 7/7, 2014 at 16:46 Comment(2)
Could you explain me how the stage parameter is used? Who initializes it? What do you mean by calling controller object? Thanks and Regards.Runstadler
Stage is initialized by the JavaFX launcher. It is used to show the application window.Gurl
C
0

You can set the Controller in the MainStage class. But you'll have to do it static, otherwise it will be null.

Hava a look at the code:

public class MainEntry {

  public static void main(String[] args) {
    Controller controller = new Controller();
    MainStage ms = new MainStage();
    ms.setController(controller);
    Application.launch(MainStage.class, (java.lang.String[]) null);
  }

}

public class MainStage extends Application {
  private static Controller controller;

  public void start(Stage primaryStage) throws Exception {
    System.out.println(controller);
    primaryStage.show();
  }

  public void setController(Controller controller){
    this.controller = controller;
  }

}

Curvilinear answered 10/10, 2015 at 18:57 Comment(0)
E
0

Of course there is a need and possibility to pass parameters to JavaFX application.

I did it to run my JavaFX client from different places, where different network configurations are required (direct or via proxy). Not to make instant changes in code, I implemented several network configurations to be chosen from in application run command with parameter like --configurationIndex=1. The default code value is 0.

List<String> parameters;
int parameterIndex;
String parameter;

parameters =
  getParameters().getRaw();

for (parameterIndex = 0;
  parameterIndex < parameters.size();
  parameterIndex++) {

  parameter =
    parameters.get(
      parameterIndex);

  if (parameter.contains("configurationIndex")) {
    configurationIndex =
      Integer.valueOf(
        parameters.get(parameterIndex).
        split("=")[1]);
  }
}

In Netbeans you can set this parameter for debugging need directly on your project: Project - Properties - Run - Parameters - insert --configurationIndex=1 into field.

Enjambement answered 9/11, 2016 at 16:56 Comment(0)
C
0

case 1 = java standard types - transmit them as java Strings "--name=value" and then convert them to the final destination using the answer of dmolony

          for ( Map.Entry<String, String> entry : namedParameters.entrySet ()){
            System.out.println (entry.getKey() + " : " + entry.getValue ());              
            switch( entry.getKey()){
            case "media_url": media_url_received = entry.getValue(); break;
            }
      }

The parameter is created at Application.launch and decoded at init

String args[] = {"--media_url=" + media_url, "--master_level=" + master_level};
Application.launch( args);

case 2 = If you have to transmit java objects use this workaround (this is for only one javafx Application launch, create a Map of workarounds and send index as strings if you have a complex case)

    public static Transfer_param javafx_tp;

and in your class init set the instance of object to a static inside it's own class

    Transfer_param.javafx_tp = tp1;

now you can statically find your last object for working with only one JavaFx Applications (remember that if you have a lot of JavaFx applications active you should send a String with a static variable identification inside a Map or array so you do not take a fake object address from your static structures (use the example at case 1 of this answer to transmit --javafx_id=3 ...))

Currier answered 20/12, 2018 at 9:58 Comment(0)

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.