How to get the first element of IEnumerable
Asked Answered
H

5

18

Is there a better way getting the first element of IEnumerable type of this:

foreach (Image image in imgList)
{
     picture.Width = (short)image.Columns;
     picture.Height = (short)image.Rows;
     break;
}

This is the exact declaration of the type:

public class ImageList : IEnumerable, IDisposable
Hairless answered 23/2, 2010 at 9:49 Comment(2)
Why you don't use generic IEnumerable<T> so ImageList could derive from IEnumerable<Image>?Mclendon
@Arnis: because ImageLIst defien in ImageMagick.net library... :)Hairless
P
36
var firstImage = imgList.Cast<Image>().First();
Pleasure answered 23/2, 2010 at 9:52 Comment(4)
@Mark, is Cast required.. cant we just use "var firstImage = ImgList.First()" ??Perdomo
@Ramesh: Cast is required in this case as First is implemented for IEnumerable<T> but ImageList only implements IEnumerable.Lenity
@Ramesh Vel, you can't use imgList.First() as it's not a generic IEnumerable<T> before casting it.Eighth
@Brian, @jonC, sorry guys i wasnt aware of that "ImageList only implements IEnumerable" :(Perdomo
E
10

If you can't use LINQ you could also get the enumerator directly by imgList.GetEnumerator() And then do a .MoveNext() to move to the first element. .Current will then give you the first element.

Eighth answered 23/2, 2010 at 10:6 Comment(0)
C
6

The extension .First() will grab the first item in an enumerable. If the collection is empty, it will throw an exception. .FirstOrDefault() will return a default value for an empty collection (null for reference types). Choose your weapon wisely!

Catechu answered 23/2, 2010 at 10:4 Comment(0)
K
0

Might be slightly irrelevant to your current situation, but there is also a .Single() and a .SingleOrDefault() which returns the first element and throws an exception if there isn't exactly one element in the collection (.Single()) or if there are more than one element in the collection (.SingleOrDefault()).

These can be very useful if you have logic that depends on only having a single (or zero) objects in your list. Although I suspect they are not what you wanted here.

Kachine answered 23/2, 2010 at 10:8 Comment(1)
Actually I know Linq very well, but the IEnumerable was confusing since regularly work with IEnumerable<T>.Hairless
A
0

I had an issue where I changed my datasource from a bindingsource to an entity framework query.

var query = dataSource as IQueryable;
var value = query.Where("prop = @0", value).Cast<object>().SingleOrDefault();

With entity framework this throw an exception `Unable to cast the type 'customer' to type 'object'. LINQ to Entities only supports casting EDM primitive or enumeration types.

The class where my code was did not have a reference to the lib with the model so ...Cast<customer> was not possible.

Anyway I used this approach

var query = dataSource as IQueryable;
var targetType = query.GetType().GetGenericArguments()[0];
var value = query.Where("prop = @0", value).SingleOrDefault(targetType);

in conjunction with an IEnumerable extension which uses reflection

    public static object SingleOrDefault(this IEnumerable enumerable, Type type)
    {
        var method = singleOrDefaultMethod.Value.MakeGenericMethod(new[] { type });
        return method.Invoke(null, new[] { enumerable });
    }

    private static Lazy<MethodInfo> singleOrDefaultMethod 
         = new Lazy<MethodInfo>(() =>
             typeof(Extensions).GetMethod(
                 "SingleOrDefault", BindingFlags.Static | BindingFlags.NonPublic));

    private static T SingleOrDefault<T>(IEnumerable<T> enumerable)
    {
        return enumerable.SingleOrDefault();
    }

feel free to implement caching per type to improve performance.

Azotize answered 7/9, 2017 at 15:44 Comment(0)

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.