I would like to iterate a TypeScript enum object and get each enumerated symbol name, for example: enum myEnum { entry1, entry2 }
for (var entry in myEnum) {
// use entry's name here, e.g., "entry1"
}
I would like to iterate a TypeScript enum object and get each enumerated symbol name, for example: enum myEnum { entry1, entry2 }
for (var entry in myEnum) {
// use entry's name here, e.g., "entry1"
}
The code you posted will work; it will print out all the members of the enum, including the values of the enum members. For example, the following code:
enum myEnum { bar, foo }
for (var enumMember in myEnum) {
console.log("enum member: ", enumMember);
}
Will print the following:
Enum member: 0
Enum member: 1
Enum member: bar
Enum member: foo
If you instead want only the member names, and not the values, you could do something like this:
for (var enumMember in myEnum) {
var isValueProperty = Number(enumMember) >= 0
if (isValueProperty) {
console.log("enum member: ", myEnum[enumMember]);
}
}
That will print out just the names:
Enum member: bar
Enum member: foo
Caveat: this slightly relies on an implementation detail: TypeScript compiles enums to a JS object with the enum values being members of the object. If TS decided to implement them different in the future, the above technique could break.
+enumMember >= 0
should be isFinite(+enumMember)
because negative or floating point values get reverse mapped too. (Playground) –
Telekinesis 00111
, you need to exclude these too –
Crafty Though the answer is already provided, Almost no one pointed to the docs
Here's a snippet
enum SampleEnum {
A,
}
let nameOfA = SampleEnum[SampleEnum.A]; // "A"
Keep in mind that string enum members do not get a reverse mapping generated at all.
0
or 1
from this enum ? export enum Octave { ZERO = 0, ONE = 1 }
–
Gudrunguelderrose enum Enum {"A"}; let nameOfA = Enum[Enum.A];
? As of [email protected] it works fine for me... –
Croy [value]: name
so you can get all values like that Object.keys(enum)
, all names Object.values(enum)
and iterate in one go using for(const [value, name] of Object.entries(enum)) { ... }
. Beware that when you get values they will be strings, not numbers as you would expect (since in JS keys of object are strings). –
Marjorymarjy class S { static SP = 1 }
and enum E { SP }
, you can call E[E.SP] // "SP"
and S["SP"]
, but not S[E[E.SP]]
. –
Hiroko let filteredKeys = Object.entries(AnimalEnum).filter(([,value]) => value === AnimalEnum.DOG || value === AnimalEnum.CAT).map(([key,]) => { return key })
–
Textbook The code you posted will work; it will print out all the members of the enum, including the values of the enum members. For example, the following code:
enum myEnum { bar, foo }
for (var enumMember in myEnum) {
console.log("enum member: ", enumMember);
}
Will print the following:
Enum member: 0
Enum member: 1
Enum member: bar
Enum member: foo
If you instead want only the member names, and not the values, you could do something like this:
for (var enumMember in myEnum) {
var isValueProperty = Number(enumMember) >= 0
if (isValueProperty) {
console.log("enum member: ", myEnum[enumMember]);
}
}
That will print out just the names:
Enum member: bar
Enum member: foo
Caveat: this slightly relies on an implementation detail: TypeScript compiles enums to a JS object with the enum values being members of the object. If TS decided to implement them different in the future, the above technique could break.
+enumMember >= 0
should be isFinite(+enumMember)
because negative or floating point values get reverse mapped too. (Playground) –
Telekinesis 00111
, you need to exclude these too –
Crafty For me an easier, practical and direct way to understand what is going on, is that the following enumeration:
enum colors { red, green, blue };
Will be converted essentially to this:
var colors = { red: 0, green: 1, blue: 2,
[0]: "red", [1]: "green", [2]: "blue" }
Because of this, the following will be true:
colors.red === 0
colors[colors.red] === "red"
colors["red"] === 0
This creates a easy way to get the name of an enumerated as follows:
var color: colors = colors.red;
console.log("The color selected is " + colors[color]);
It also creates a nice way to convert a string to an enumerated value.
var colorName: string = "green";
var color: colors = colors.red;
if (colorName in colors) color = colors[colorName];
The two situations above are far more common situation, because usually you are far more interested in the name of a specific value and serializing values in a generic way.
If you only search for the names and iterate later use:
Object.keys(myEnum).map(key => myEnum[key]).filter(value => typeof value === 'string') as string[];
Object.values(myEnum).filter(value => typeof value === 'string') as string[];
–
Indigent Object.values(myEnum).filter(value => typeof value === 'string').map(key => { return {id: myEnum[key], type: key }; });
–
Squirm Object.keys(myEnum)
enough to get an array with of key names in an enum object? –
Hanuman Object.entries(temp1).splice(Object.keys(temp1).length/2)
so we get the entries –
Lepido enum Test1 { A = "C", B = "D"}
returns ["C", "D"]
. That's values, not keys. –
Gulick Object.keys(myEnum)
returns not only string keys of enum but also theis corresponding index in enum. Like ts enum Color { Black, White } console.log(Object.keys(Color)) // '0', '1', 'Black', 'White'
–
Danikadanila Assuming you stick to the rules and only produce enums with numeric values, you can use this code. This correctly handles the case where you have a name that is coincidentally a valid number
enum Color {
Red,
Green,
Blue,
"10" // wat
}
var names: string[] = [];
for(var n in Color) {
if(typeof Color[n] === 'number') names.push(n);
}
console.log(names); // ['Red', 'Green', 'Blue', '10']
Object.prototype.foo = 1;
–
Gulick It seems that none of the answers here will work with string-enums in strict
-mode.
Consider enum as:
enum AnimalEnum {
dog = "dog", cat = "cat", mouse = "mouse"
}
Accessing this with AnimalEnum["dog"]
may result in an error like:
Element implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'any' can't be used to index type 'typeof AnimalEnum'.ts(7053)
.
Proper solution for that case, write it as:
AnimalEnum["dog" as keyof typeof AnimalEnum]
keyof
with typeof
! Other solution seems pretty opaque, but after all I think Typescript needs to keep improve on DX - Developer Experience for Enum –
Corcovado As of TypeScript 2.4, enums can contain string intializers https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/release-notes/typescript-2-4.html
This allows you to write:
enum Order {
ONE = "First",
TWO = "Second"
}
console.log(`One is ${Order.ONE.toString()}`);
and get this output:
One is First
With current TypeScript Version 1.8.9 I use typed Enums:
export enum Option {
OPTION1 = <any>'this is option 1',
OPTION2 = <any>'this is option 2'
}
with results in this Javascript object:
Option = {
"OPTION1": "this is option 1",
"OPTION2": "this is option 2",
"this is option 1": "OPTION1",
"this is option 2": "OPTION2"
}
so I have to query through keys and values and only return values:
let optionNames: Array<any> = [];
for (let enumValue in Option) {
let optionNameLength = optionNames.length;
if (optionNameLength === 0) {
this.optionNames.push([enumValue, Option[enumValue]]);
} else {
if (this.optionNames[optionNameLength - 1][1] !== enumValue) {
this.optionNames.push([enumValue, Option[enumValue]]);
}
}
}
And I receive the option keys in an Array:
optionNames = [ "OPTION1", "OPTION2" ];
optionNames = [["OPTION1", "this is option 1"], ["OPTION2", "this is option 2"]]
, but overall I appreciate your idea of removing double reversed entries, everyone else here considers that value is always a number –
Michal [["OPTION1", "this is option 1"], ["OPTION2", "this is option 2"]]
instead. Even if you take first element of each of those tuples, it fails on enum Test2 { A, B }
by producing ["0", "1", "A", "B"]
. –
Gulick This solution work too.
enum ScreenType {
Edit = 1,
New = 2,
View = 4
}
var type: ScreenType = ScreenType.Edit;
console.log(ScreenType[type]); //Edit
In a nutshell
if your enums
is as below:
export enum Colors1 {
Red = 1,
Green = 2,
Blue = 3
}
to get specific text and value:
console.log(Colors1.Red); // 1
console.log(Colors1[Colors1.Red]); // Red
to get list of value and text:
public getTextAndValues(e: { [s: number]: string }) {
for (const enumMember in e) {
if (parseInt(enumMember, 10) >= 0) {
console.log(e[enumMember]) // Value, such as 1,2,3
console.log(parseInt(enumMember, 10)) // Text, such as Red,Green,Blue
}
}
}
this.getTextAndValues(Colors1)
if your enums
is as below:
export enum Colors2 {
Red = "Red",
Green = "Green",
Blue = "Blue"
}
to get specific text and value:
console.log(Colors2.Red); // Red
console.log(Colors2["Red"]); // Red
to get list of value and text:
public getTextAndValues(e: { [s: string]: string }) {
for (const enumMember in e) {
console.log(e[enumMember]);// Value, such as Red,Green,Blue
console.log(enumMember); // Text, such as Red,Green,Blue
}
}
this.getTextAndValues(Colors2)
thsi
it's easy to imply the code wasn't ever compiled. –
Gulick enum A { B = -1 }
is perfectly valid. –
Gulick Another interesting solution found here is using ES6 Map:
export enum Type {
low,
mid,
high
}
export const TypeLabel = new Map<number, string>([
[Type.low, 'Low Season'],
[Type.mid, 'Mid Season'],
[Type.high, 'High Season']
]);
USE
console.log(TypeLabel.get(Type.low)); // Low Season
TypeLabel.forEach((label, value) => {
console.log(label, value);
});
// Low Season 0
// Mid Season 1
// High Season 2
enum Test { A = 0 }
–
Gulick Let ts-enum-util
(github, npm) do the work for you and provide a lot of additional type-safe utilities. Works with both string and numeric enums, properly ignoring the numeric index reverse lookup entries for numeric enums:
String enum:
import {$enum} from "ts-enum-util";
enum Option {
OPTION1 = 'this is option 1',
OPTION2 = 'this is option 2'
}
// type: ("OPTION1" | "OPTION2")[]
// value: ["OPTION1", "OPTION2"]
const keys= $enum(Option).getKeys();
// type: Option[]
// value: ["this is option 1", "this is option 2"]
const values = $enum(Option).getValues();
Numeric enum:
enum Option {
OPTION1,
OPTION2
}
// type: ("OPTION1" | "OPTION2")[]
// value: ["OPTION1", "OPTION2"]
const keys= $enum(Option).getKeys();
// type: Option[]
// value: [0, 1]
const values = $enum(Option).getValues();
"0"
and 0
. Also, size of the library is ridiculous. –
Gulick "0"
and 0
? And about the size of the library, are you just looking at the total size of the NPM package? The size of the raw code itself is pretty small. Most of the package size is documentation (code comments and markdown files), and the fully documented source code is included with source maps for debugging. –
Collier enum Test { NaN = 'LOL' }
it produces []
. –
Gulick I got tired looking through incorrect answers, and did it myself.
type EnumKeys<Enum> = Exclude<keyof Enum, number>
const enumObject = <Enum extends Record<string, number | string>>(e: Enum) => {
const copy = {...e} as { [K in EnumKeys<Enum>]: Enum[K] };
Object.values(e).forEach(value => typeof value === 'number' && delete copy[value]);
return copy;
};
const enumKeys = <Enum extends Record<string, number | string>>(e: Enum) => {
return Object.keys(enumObject(e)) as EnumKeys<Enum>[];
};
const enumValues = <Enum extends Record<string, number | string>>(e: Enum) => {
return [...new Set(Object.values(enumObject(e)))] as Enum[EnumKeys<Enum>][];
};
enum Test1 { A = "C", B = "D"}
enum Test2 { A, B }
enum Test3 { A = 0, B = "C" }
enum Test4 { A = "0", B = "C" }
enum Test5 { undefined = "A" }
enum Test6 { A = "undefined" }
enum Test7 { A, B = "A" }
enum Test8 { A = "A", B = "A" }
enum Test9 { A = "B", B = "A" }
console.log(enumObject(Test1)); // {A: "C", B: "D"}
console.log(enumObject(Test2)); // {A: 0, B: 1}
console.log(enumObject(Test3)); // {A: 0, B: "C"}
console.log(enumObject(Test4)); // {A: "0", B: "C"}
console.log(enumObject(Test5)); // {undefined: "A"}
console.log(enumObject(Test6)); // {A: "undefined"}
console.log(enumObject(Test7)); // {A: 0,B: "A"}
console.log(enumObject(Test8)); // {A: "A", B: "A"}
console.log(enumObject(Test9)); // {A: "B", B: "A"}
console.log(enumKeys(Test1)); // ["A", "B"]
console.log(enumKeys(Test2)); // ["A", "B"]
console.log(enumKeys(Test3)); // ["A", "B"]
console.log(enumKeys(Test4)); // ["A", "B"]
console.log(enumKeys(Test5)); // ["undefined"]
console.log(enumKeys(Test6)); // ["A"]
console.log(enumKeys(Test7)); // ["A", "B"]
console.log(enumKeys(Test8)); // ["A", "B"]
console.log(enumKeys(Test9)); // ["A", "B"]
console.log(enumValues(Test1)); // ["C", "D"]
console.log(enumValues(Test2)); // [0, 1]
console.log(enumValues(Test3)); // [0, "C"]
console.log(enumValues(Test4)); // ["0", "C"]
console.log(enumValues(Test5)); // ["A"]
console.log(enumValues(Test6)); // ["undefined"]
console.log(enumValues(Test7)); // [0, "A"]
console.log(enumValues(Test8)); // ["A"]
console.log(enumValues(Test9)); // ["B", "A"]
In TypeScript, an enum is compiled to a map (to get the value from the key) in javascript:
enum MyEnum {
entry0,
entry1,
}
console.log(MyEnum['entry0']); // 0
console.log(MyEnum['entry1']); // 1
It also creates a reversed map (to get the key from the value):
console.log(MyEnum[0]); // 'entry0'
console.log(MyEnum[0]); // 'entry1'
So you can access the name of an entry by doing:
console.log(MyEnum[MyEnum.entry0]); // 'entry0'
console.log(MyEnum[MyEnum.entry1]); // 'entry1'
However, string enum has no reverse map by design (see comment and pull request) because this could lead to conflict between keys and values in the map object.
enum MyEnum {
entry0 = 'value0',
entry1 = 'value1',
}
console.log(MyEnum['value0']); // undefined
console.log(MyEnum['value1']); // undefined
If you want to force your string enum to compile a reversed map (you then have to make sure all the keys and values are different), you can use this trick:
enum MyEnum {
entry0 = <any>'value0',
entry1 = <any>'value1',
}
console.log(MyEnum['value0']); // 'entry0'
console.log(MyEnum['value1']); // 'entry1'
console.log(MyEnum[MyEnum.entry0]); // 'entry0'
console.log(MyEnum[MyEnum.entry1]); // 'entry1'
Assume you have an enum
export enum SCROLL_LABEL_OFFSET {
SMALL = 48,
REGULAR = 60,
LARGE = 112
}
and you want to create a type based on enum but not just copy and paste.
You could use an enum
to create your type
like this:
export type ScrollLabelOffset = keyof typeof SCROLL_LABEL_OFFSET;
In result you will receive a type
with possible values as 'SMALL' | 'REGULAR' | 'LARGE'
Starting from TypeScript 2.4, the enum would not contain the key as a member anymore. source from TypeScript readme
The caveat is that string-initialized enums can't be reverse-mapped to get the original enum member name. In other words, you can't write Colors["RED"] to get the string "Red".
My solution:
export const getColourKey = (value: string ) => {
let colourKey = '';
for (const key in ColourEnum) {
if (value === ColourEnum[key]) {
colourKey = key;
break;
}
}
return colourKey;
};
Based on some answers above I came up with this type-safe function signature:
export function getStringValuesFromEnum<T>(myEnum: T): (keyof T)[] {
return Object.keys(myEnum).filter(k => typeof (myEnum as any)[k] === 'number') as any;
}
Usage:
enum myEnum { entry1, entry2 };
const stringVals = getStringValuesFromEnum(myEnum);
the type of stringVals
is 'entry1' | 'entry2'
(keyof T)[]
instead of keyof T
. Also, the export
stops your playground from working. –
Dropsonde enum Test1 { A = "C", B = "D" }
returns []
. –
Gulick They have provided a concept called 'reverse-mapping' in their official documentation. It helped me:
https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/enums.html#reverse-mappings
The solution is quite straight forward:
enum Enum {
A,
}
let a = Enum.A;
let nameOfA = Enum[a]; // "A"
enum
s. –
Ascidian According to TypeScript documentation, we can do this via Enum with static functions.
Get Enum Name with static functions
enum myEnum {
entry1,
entry2
}
namespace myEnum {
export function GetmyEnumName(m: myEnum) {
return myEnum[m];
}
}
now we can call it like below
myEnum.GetmyEnumName(myEnum.entry1);
// result entry1
for reading more about Enum with static function follow the below link https://basarat.gitbooks.io/typescript/docs/enums.html
I wrote an EnumUtil class which is making a type check by the enum value:
export class EnumUtils {
/**
* Returns the enum keys
* @param enumObj enum object
* @param enumType the enum type
*/
static getEnumKeys(enumObj: any, enumType: EnumType): any[] {
return EnumUtils.getEnumValues(enumObj, enumType).map(value => enumObj[value]);
}
/**
* Returns the enum values
* @param enumObj enum object
* @param enumType the enum type
*/
static getEnumValues(enumObj: any, enumType: EnumType): any[] {
return Object.keys(enumObj).filter(key => typeof enumObj[key] === enumType);
}
}
export enum EnumType {
Number = 'number',
String = 'string'
}
How to use it:
enum NumberValueEnum{
A= 0,
B= 1
}
enum StringValueEnum{
A= 'A',
B= 'B'
}
EnumUtils.getEnumKeys(NumberValueEnum, EnumType.Number);
EnumUtils.getEnumValues(NumberValueEnum, EnumType.Number);
EnumUtils.getEnumKeys(StringValueEnum, EnumType.String);
EnumUtils.getEnumValues(StringValueEnum, EnumType.String);
Result for NumberValueEnum keys: ["A", "B"]
Result for NumberValueEnum values: [0, 1]
Result for StringValueEnumkeys: ["A", "B"]
Result for StringValueEnumvalues: ["A", "B"]
There are already a lot of answers here but I figure I'll throw my solution onto the stack anyway.
enum AccountType {
Google = 'goo',
Facebook = 'boo',
Twitter = 'wit',
}
type Key = keyof typeof AccountType // "Google" | "Facebook" | "Twitter"
// this creates a POJO of the enum "reversed" using TypeScript's Record utility
const reversed = (Object.keys(AccountType) as Key[]).reduce((acc, key) => {
acc[AccountType[key]] = key
return acc
}, {} as Record<AccountType, string>)
For Clarity:
/*
* reversed == {
* "goo": "Google",
* "boo": "Facebook",
* "wit": "Twitter",
* }
* reversed[AccountType.Google] === "Google" 👍
*/
Reference for TypeScript Record
To iterate:
for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(reversed)) {
console.log(`${key}: ${value}`);
}
A nice helper function:
const getAccountTypeName = (type: AccountType) => {
return reversed[type]
};
// getAccountTypeName(AccountType.Twitter) === 'Twitter'
enum Test8 { A = "A", B = "A" }
? The question asked for a way to "get each enumerated symbol name", i.e. for a list of keys. –
Gulick Object.entries
–
Angelikaangelina Having numeric enum:
enum MyNumericEnum {
First = 1,
Second = 2
}
You need to convert it to array first:
const values = Object.values(MyNumericEnum);
// ['First', 'Second', 1, 2]
As you see, it contains both keys and values. Keys go first.
After that, you can retrieve its keys:
values.slice(0, values.length / 2);
// ['First', 'Second']
And values:
values.slice(values.length / 2);
// [1, 2]
For string enums, you can use Object.keys(MyStringEnum)
in order to get keys and Object.values(MyStringEnum)
in order to get values respectively.
Though it's somewhat challenging to extract keys and values of mixed enum.
enum Test { A = 0, B = -1 }
it produces ["A", 0]
as keys. –
Gulick const enumValues = Object.values(Test); const keys = enumValues.filter((value) => !(/^-?\d+$/.test(value))); const values = enumValues.filter((value) => /^-?\d+$/.test(value));
–
Gipsy The only solution that works for me in all cases (even if values are strings) is the following :
var enumToString = function(enumType, enumValue) {
for (var enumMember in enumType) {
if (enumType[enumMember]==enumValue) return enumMember
}
}
enum TransactionStatus {
SUBMITTED = 'submitted',
APPROVED = 'approved',
PAID = 'paid',
CANCELLED = 'cancelled',
DECLINED = 'declined',
PROCESSING = 'processing',
}
let set1 = Object.entries(TransactionStatus).filter(([,value]) => value === TransactionStatus.SUBMITTED || value === TransactionStatus.CANCELLED).map(([key,]) => {
return key
})
let set2 = Object.entries(TransactionStatus).filter(([,value]) => value === TransactionStatus.PAID || value === TransactionStatus.APPROVED).map(([key,]) => {
return key
})
let allKeys = Object.keys(TransactionStatus)
console.log({set1,set2,allKeys})
You can use the enum-values
package I wrote when I had the same problem:
var names = EnumValues.getNames(myEnum);
Object.keys(e).filter(key => isNaN(+key))
, which will not work with string enums, etc, right? –
Fumed enum Test { A = 0, B = NaN }
it returns ["A", "B", "NaN"]
. –
Gulick if (someBool.toString() === 'true')
: a random conversion that the problem never even needed. –
Gulick I found this question by searching "TypeScript iterate over enum keys". So I just want to post solution which works for me in my case. Maybe it'll help to someone too.
My case is the following: I want to iterate over each enum key, then filter some keys, then access some object which has keys as computed values from enum. So this is how I do it without having any TS error.
enum MyEnum = { ONE = 'ONE', TWO = 'TWO' }
const LABELS = {
[MyEnum.ONE]: 'Label one',
[MyEnum.TWO]: 'Label two'
}
// to declare type is important - otherwise TS complains on LABELS[type]
// also, if replace Object.values with Object.keys -
// - TS blames wrong types here: "string[] is not assignable to MyEnum[]"
const allKeys: Array<MyEnum> = Object.values(MyEnum)
const allowedKeys = allKeys.filter(
(type) => type !== MyEnum.ONE
)
const allowedLabels = allowedKeys.map((type) => ({
label: LABELS[type]
}))
You can get an array of names from Enum in this way:
const enumNames: string[] = Object.keys(YourEnum).filter(key => isNaN(Number(key)));
enum Test { A = 0, B = NaN }
it returns ["A", "B", "NaN"]
. –
Gulick In case if you want to get the name in the html
For this enum
enum CanadianProvinces {
AB,
BC,
MB,
NB,
NL,
NT,
NS,
NU,
ON,
PE,
QC,
SK,
YT
}
Assign a variable in your component as
canadianProvinces = CanadianProvinces
Then, in your html
{{canadianProvinces[0]}}
Old question, but, why do not use a const
object map?
Instead of doing this:
enum Foo {
BAR = 60,
EVERYTHING_IS_TERRIBLE = 80
}
console.log(Object.keys(Foo))
// -> ["60", "80", "BAR", "EVERYTHING_IS_TERRIBLE"]
console.log(Object.values(Foo))
// -> ["BAR", "EVERYTHING_IS_TERRIBLE", 60, 80]
Do this (pay attention to the as const
cast):
const Foo = {
BAR: 60,
EVERYTHING_IS_TERRIBLE: 80
} as const
console.log(Object.keys(Foo))
// -> ["BAR", "EVERYTHING_IS_TERRIBLE"]
console.log(Object.values(Foo))
// -> [60, 80]
console.log(Object.keys(Foo))
in the first example only returns ["BAR", "EVERYTHING_IS_TERRIBLE"]
.. –
Hbeam ["60", "80", "BAR", "EVERYTHING_IS_TERRIBLE"]
–
Lebna If you have enum
enum Diet {
KETO = "Ketogenic",
ATKINS = "Atkins",
PALEO = "Paleo",
DGAF = "Whatever"
}
Then you can get key and values like:
Object.keys(Diet).forEach((d: Diet) => {
console.log(d); // KETO
console.log(Diet[d]) // Ketogenic
});
Argument of type '(d: Diet) => void' is not assignable to parameter of type '(value: string, index: number, array: string[]) => void'. Types of parameters 'd' and 'value' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type 'MyEnum'.(2345)
–
Gupton enum Test2 { A, B }
it shows "0", "1", "A", "B"
as keys. –
Gulick I find that solution more elegant:
for (let val in myEnum ) {
if ( isNaN( parseInt( val )) )
console.log( val );
}
It displays:
bar
foo
enum Test { A = 0, B = NaN }
produces ["A", "B", "NaN"]
. –
Gulick To get the list of the enum values you have to use:
enum AnimalEnum {
DOG = "dog",
CAT = "cat",
MOUSE = "mouse"
}
Object.values(AnimalEnum);
["DOG", "CAT", "MOUSE", 1, 2, 3]
–
Terrence I hope the question is still relevant. I use such functions:
function enumKeys(target: Record<string, number|string>): string[] {
const allKeys: string[] = Object.keys(target);
const parsedKeys: string[] = [];
for (const key of allKeys) {
const needToIgnore: boolean
= target[target[key]]?.toString() === key && !isNaN(parseInt(key));
if (!needToIgnore) {
parsedKeys.push(key);
}
}
return parsedKeys;
}
function enumValues(target: Record<string, number|string>): Array<string|number> {
const keys: string[] = enumKeys(target);
const values: Array<string|number> = [];
for (const key of keys) {
values.push(target[key]);
}
return values;
}
Example:
enum HttpStatus {
OK,
INTERNAL_ERROR,
FORBIDDEN = 'FORBIDDEN',
NOT_FOUND = 404,
BAD_GATEWAY = 'bad-gateway'
}
console.log(enumKeys(HttpStatus));
// > ["OK", "INTERNAL_ERROR", "FORBIDDEN", "NOT_FOUND", "BAD_GATEWAY"]
console.log(enumValues(HttpStatus));
// > [0, 1, "FORBIDDEN", 404, "bad-gateway"]
Array<string | number>
and the parsedKeys variable as string[]
. –
Missend isNaN(parseInt(key)
is otherwise called typeof key !== 'number'
. Convering a number to string and then back to number just to check that it's really a number is not smart. –
Gulick isNaN(parseInt(key)
gives more information, such as whether the string is a numeric string. –
Gingili This would work more efficiently for key-value based enum:
enum yourEnum {
["First Key"] = "firstWordValue",
["Second Key"] = "secondWordValue"
}
Object.keys(yourEnum)[Object.values(yourEnum).findIndex(x => x === yourValue)]
// Result for passing values as yourValue
// FirstKey
// SecondKey
yourValue
? Question is to "get each enumerated symbol name". –
Gulick Can be short and simple:
enum AnimalEnum {
DOG = "dog",
CAT = "cat",
MOUSE = "mouse"
}
Object.keys(AnimalEnum).filter(v => typeof v == 'string' && isNaN(v))
enum Test { A = 0, B = NaN }
produces ["A", "B", "NaN"]
. –
Gulick let filteredKeys = Object.entries(AnimalEnum).filter(([,value]) => value === AnimalEnum.DOG || value === AnimalEnum.CAT).map(([key,]) => { return key })
–
Textbook You can do the following, which I think is shortest, cleanest and fastest:
Object.entries(test).filter(([key]) => (!~~key && key !== "0"))
Given the following mixed type enum definition:
enum testEnum {
Critical = "critical",
Major = 3,
Normal = "2",
Minor = "minor",
Info = "info",
Debug = 0
};
It will get transpire to the following:
var testEnum = {
Critical: 'critical',
Major: 3,
Normal: "2",
Minor: 'minor',
Info: "info",
Debug: 0,
[0]: "critical",
[1]: 3,
[2]: "2",
[3]: "minor",
[4]: "info",
[5]: 0
}
function safeEnumEntries(test) {
return Object.entries(test).filter(([key]) => (!~~key && key !== "0"));
};
console.log(safeEnumEntries(testEnum));
After executing the function, you will get only the good entries:
[
["Critical", "critical"],
["Major", 3],
["Normal", "2"],
["Minor", "minor"],
["Info", "info"],
["Debug", 0]
]
enum Test { A = 0, B = NaN }
returns ["A", "B", "NaN"]
. –
Gulick My Enum is like this:
export enum UserSorting {
SortByFullName = "Sort by FullName",
SortByLastname = "Sort by Lastame",
SortByEmail = "Sort by Email",
SortByRoleName = "Sort by Role",
SortByCreatedAt = "Sort by Creation date",
SortByCreatedBy = "Sort by Author",
SortByUpdatedAt = "Sort by Edit date",
SortByUpdatedBy = "Sort by Editor",
}
so doing this return undefined:
UserSorting[UserSorting.SortByUpdatedAt]
To resolve this issue, I choose another way to do it using a Pipe:
import { Pipe, PipeTransform } from '@angular/core';
@Pipe({
name: 'enumKey'
})
export class EnumKeyPipe implements PipeTransform {
transform(value, args: string[] = null): any {
let enumValue = args[0];
var keys = Object.keys(value);
var values = Object.values(value);
for (var i = 0; i < keys.length; i++) {
if (values[i] == enumValue) {
return keys[i];
}
}
return null;
}
}
And to use it:
return this.enumKeyPipe.transform(UserSorting, [UserSorting.SortByUpdatedAt]);
It is not exactly answer of your question but it is a trick to tackle your problem.
export module Gender {
export enum Type {
Female = 1,
Male = 2
};
export const List = Object.freeze([
Type[Type.Female] ,
Type[Type.Male]
]);
}
You can extend your list model in a way you want.
export const List = Object.freeze([
{ name: Type[Type.Female], value: Type.Female } ,
{ name: Type[Type.Male], value: Type.Male }
]);
Now, you can use it in this way:
for(const gender of Gender.List){
console.log(gender.name);
console.log(gender.value);
}
or:
if(i === Gender.Type.Male){
console.log("I am a man.");
}
I wrote a helper function to enumerate an enum:
static getEnumValues<T extends number>(enumType: {}): T[] {
const values: T[] = [];
const keys = Object.keys(enumType);
for (const key of keys.slice(0, keys.length / 2)) {
values.push(<T>+key);
}
return values;
}
Usage:
for (const enumValue of getEnumValues<myEnum>(myEnum)) {
// do the thing
}
The function returns something that can be easily enumerated, and also casts to the enum type.
enum Test1 { A = "C", B = "D" }
returns [NaN]
. –
Gulick Quite a few answers here and considering I looked it up despite this being 7 years old question, I surmise many more will come here. Here's my solution, which is a bit simpler than other ones, it handles numeric-only/text-only/mixed value enums, all the same.
enum funky {
yum , tum='tum', gum = 'jump', plum = 4
}
const list1 = Object.keys(funky)
.filter(k => (Number(k).toString() === Number.NaN.toString()));
console.log(JSON.stringify(list1)); // ["yum","tum","gum","plum"]"
// for the numeric enum vals (like yum = 0, plum = 4), typescript adds val = key implicitly (0 = yum, 4 = plum)
// hence we need to filter out such numeric keys (0 or 4)
enum Test { A = 0, B = NaN }
it returns ["A", "B", "NaN"]
. –
Gulick My humble 2 cents based on reading an awesome comment from github TS discussion
const EnvironmentVariants = ['development', 'production', 'test'] as const
type EPredefinedEnvironment = typeof EnvironmentVariants[number]
Then at compile time:
// TS2322: Type '"qaEnv"' is not assignable to type '"development" | "production" | "test"'.
const qaEnv: EPredefinedEnvironment = 'qa'
at runtime:
function isPredefinedEnvironemt(env: string) {
for (const predefined of EnvironmentVariants) {
if (predefined === env) {
return true
}
}
return false
}
assert(isPredefinedEnvironemet('test'), true)
assert(isPredefinedEnvironemet('qa'), false)
Note, that for(const index in EnvironmentVariants) {...}
will iterate over "0", "1", "2" set
Here is a typed utility function which extracts enum names and values:
type Enum = { [key: string]: number | string };
function *enumNamesAndValues<E extends Enum>(e: E): Iterable<[keyof E, E[keyof E]]> {
for (const key in e) {
const value = e[key];
if (typeof value === "number")
yield [key, value];
}
}
You can use it like this:
enum ETestEnum {
Foo,
Bar,
Baz
}
const namesAndValues = [...enumNamesAndValues(ETestEnum)];
console.log(namesAndValues);
This prints:
[["Foo", 0], ["Bar", 1], ["Baz", 2]]
Note that the type of namesAndValues
is ["Foo" | "Bar" | "Baz", ETestEnum][]
.
Extracting only names or only values can be accomplished analogously:
function *enumNames<E extends Enum>(e: E): Iterable<keyof E> {
for (const key in e) {
const value = e[key];
if (typeof value === "number")
yield key;
}
}
function *enumValues<E extends Enum>(e: E): Iterable<E[keyof E]> {
for (const key in e) {
const value = e[key];
if (typeof value === "number")
yield value;
}
}
Using a current version TypeScript you can use functions like these to map the Enum to a record of your choosing. Note that you cannot define string values with these functions as they look for keys with a value that is a number.
enum STATES {
LOGIN,
LOGOUT,
}
export const enumToRecordWithKeys = <E extends any>(enumeration: E): E => (
Object.keys(enumeration)
.filter(key => typeof enumeration[key] === 'number')
.reduce((record, key) => ({...record, [key]: key }), {}) as E
);
export const enumToRecordWithValues = <E extends any>(enumeration: E): E => (
Object.keys(enumeration)
.filter(key => typeof enumeration[key] === 'number')
.reduce((record, key) => ({...record, [key]: enumeration[key] }), {}) as E
);
const states = enumToRecordWithKeys(STATES)
const statesWithIndex = enumToRecordWithValues(STATES)
console.log(JSON.stringify({
STATES,
states,
statesWithIndex,
}, null ,2));
// Console output:
{
"STATES": {
"0": "LOGIN",
"1": "LOGOUT",
"LOGIN": 0,
"LOGOUT": 1
},
"states": {
"LOGIN": "LOGIN",
"LOGOUT": "LOGOUT"
},
"statesWithIndex": {
"LOGIN": 0,
"LOGOUT": 1
}
}
.reduce((accum, key) => ({...accum, [key]: ... }), {})
is an antipattern with O(N^2)
complexity. Don't use this code. –
Gulick enum Test1 { A = "C", B = "D" }
the result of enumToRecordWithKeys
is {}
. –
Gulick If it's your enum
and you define as seen below, names and values are the same, it'll give you the entries' names directly.
enum myEnum {
entry1="entry1",
entry2="entry2"
}
for (var entry in myEnum) {
// use entry's name here, e.g., "entry1"
}
enum Test3 { A = 0, B = "C" }
. –
Gulick if condition
. :) –
Davy © 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.
getAllEnumValues
andgetAllEnumKeys
for your purpose – Sewollfor (const [name, value] of MyEnum) {
to Typescript. Hopefully this will be easier one day! – OtherworldlyEnumType.name()
method. – Delvalle