DotPeek PDB generation for assemblies without debug directory
Asked Answered
K

1

20

I'm attempting to use JetBrains dotPeek 1.4 symbol server however I've encountered some 3rd party assemblies that fail, with dotPeek status of:

Pdb has not been generated because assembly does not contain debug directory

Using CFF Explorer I've discovered that these assemblies have empty "Debug Directory" Portable Executable (PE) header values.

Is there an (easy) way to edit the PE to add Debug Directory header values?

Kuehnel answered 8/7, 2015 at 17:5 Comment(0)
M
6

de4dot creates invalid .net executable module in the eyes of dotPeek. It's problem of dotPeek, not de4dot, however. But since we do not have sources of dotPeek we ought to modify de4dot instead to achieve interoperability. Modify: de4dot.code/AssemblyModule.cs module adding

writerOptions.WritePdb = true;
module.CreatePdbState();

to de4dot.code.AssemblyModule.Save function and you fill have valid pdb function in exe module.

To save your time you can use de4dot project with my patch: https://github.com/earnol/de4dot/commit/24c6e696fb9251f7d048ac33c88c710013a649d6 It will add debug directory to the output executable. Just delete resulting PDB and run dotPeek again. It will work flawlessly. Use something like: de4dot.exe -f filein.exe -o fileout.exe -fpdb

Marrymars answered 25/10, 2015 at 17:31 Comment(3)
I applied @ainz-ooal-gown's modification to the latest de4dot version and compiled a binary release for download: github.com/djkrose/de4dot/releases/tag/v3.1.41592-fpdbAttorneyatlaw
I wrote a simple script for myself that should be useful to others, too. Drop it in the same directory as a modified de4dot.dll, such as @Hannobo's, and run.Speculum
I also made a somewhat newer fork of de4dot with @Hannobo's changes. If I remember correctly, there was merge conflict I needed to fix, so this may be useful to someone else.Speculum

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.