May be this question has been asked before but I think it is good to consider it again today given that these technologies have matured. We're looking to use one of flume, kafka, scribe, or others to store streaming facebook and twitter profile information into hbase for doing analytics later on. We're considering flume for the purpose but I have not worked with other technologies in order to make an informed decision. Anyone who can shed some light will be great! Thanks a lot.
flume vs kafka vs others [closed]
when you talk about flume, presumably you are referring to flume-ng? because old flume is very different from flume-ng. –
Turbo
Mediawiki (Wikipedia) went through this and published a nice article of how they arrived at their choice (Kafka) vs Scribe, Flume and others.
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Analytics/Kraken/Request_Logging
new link:
https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Analytics/Archive/Hadoop_Logging_-_Solutions_Recommendation
summary for posterity:
"Our recommendation is Apache Kafka, a distributed pub-sub messaging system designed for throughput. We evaluated about a dozen[1] best-of-breed systems drawn from the domains of distributed log collection, CEP / stream processing, and real-time messaging systems. While these systems offer surprisingly similar features, they differ substantially in implementation, and each is specialized to a particular work profile (a more thorough technical discussion is available as an appendix).
"Kafka stands out because it is specialized for throughput and explicitly distributed in all tiers of its architecture. Interestingly, it is also concerned enough with resource conservation[2] to offer sensible tradeoffs that loosen guarantees in exchange for performance — something that may not strike Facebook or Google as an important feature in the systems they design. Constraints breed creativity.
"In addition, Kafka has several perks of particular interest to Operations readers. While it is written in Scala, it ships with a native C++ producer library that can be embedded in a module for our cache servers, obviating the need to run the JVM on those servers. Second, producers can be configured to batch requests to optimize network traffic, but do not create a persistent local log which would require additional maintenance. Kafka's I/O and memory usage is left up to the OS rather than the JVM[3].
"Kafka was written by LinkedIn and is now an Apache project. In production at LinkedIn, approximately 10,000 producers are handled by eight Kafka servers per datacenter. These clusters consolidate their streams into a single analytics datacenter, which Kafka supports out of the box via a simple mirroring configuration.
"These features are a very apt fit for our intended use cases; even those we don't intend to use — such as sharding and routing by "topic" categories — are interesting and might prove useful in the future as we expand our goals.
"The rest of this document dives into these topics in greater detail..."
link appears to be broken now. –
Hazen
© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.