The difficulty with using Futures with LINQ is that operations like Count execute immediately.
As @vandalo found out, Count()
after ToFuture()
actually runs the Count in memory, which is bad.
The only way to get the count in a future LINQ query is to use GroupBy
in an invariant field. A good choice would be something that is already part of your filters (like an "IsActive" property)
Here's an example assuming you have such a property in Payment:
//Create base query. Filters should be specified here.
var query = session.Query<Payment>().Where(x => x.IsActive == 1);
//Create a sorted, paged, future query,
//that will execute together with other statements
var futureResults = query.OrderByDescending(payment => payment.Created)
.Skip((page - 1) * pageSize)
.Take(pageSize)
.ToFuture();
//Create a Count future query based on the original one.
//The paged query will be sent to the server in the same roundtrip.
var futureCount = query.GroupBy(x => x.IsActive)
.Select(x => x.Count())
.ToFutureValue();
//Get the results.
var results = futureResults.ToArray();
var count = futureCount.Value;
Of course, the alternative is doing two roundtrips, which is not that bad anyway. You can still reuse the original IQueryable, which is useful when you want to do paging in a higher-level layer:
//Create base query. Filters should be specified here.
var query = session.Query<Payment>();
//Create a sorted, paged query,
var pagedQuery = query.OrderByDescending(payment => payment.Created)
.Skip((page - 1) * pageSize)
.Take(pageSize);
//Get the count from the original query
var count = query.Count();
//Get the results.
var results = pagedQuery.ToArray();
Update (2011-02-22): I wrote a blog post about this issue and a much better solution.