My rudimentary understanding is that
UserTransaction is used when JTA is
required (e.g. to do queries on
mulitple things), and that
EntityTransaction is used when JPA
only is required (e.g. when the query
is atomic).
That's basically right, but your description of "multiple things" and "atomic" is a bit strange. JTA allows the developper to use distributed transaction to perform changes on multiples resources (database, JMS broker, etc.) atomically (all-or-nothing). If only one resource is accessed (e.g. one single database), you don't need JTA, but the transaction is still atomic (all-or-nothing). That's for instance the case when you use a regular JDBC transaction on one database.
Considering UserTransaction
vs. EntityTransaction
:
- If JPA is use stand-alone, you use
EntityTransaction
to demarcate the transaction yourself.
- If JPA is used within a managed environment where it integrates with JTA, you use
UserTransaction
. The EntityManager
hooks itself into the JTA distributed transaction manager. The only subtlety I'm aware of considers the flush of the changes. When EntityTransaction
is used, JPA know it needs to flush the changes. If transaction are controlled using UserTransaction
, it needs to register a callback using JTA registerSynchronization
, so that the changes are flushed to the database before the transaction completes. If you use EJB with CMT (container managed transaction), you don't even need to use UserTransaction
: the app server starts and stops the transactions for you.
Related questions:
EntityTransaction
- I did search before asking. – Pastelki