What is the main implementation idea behind sparse hash table?

Question

Why does Google sparsehash open-source library has two implementations: a dense hashtable and a sparse one?

Vida

I think i'm misunderstanding the question in the post. Wouldn't sparse hashtables + dense hashtables == all hashtables? And if so, then why is the library called "sparsehash"? – Brelje

BTW: documentation from Google Code. – Brelje

Answer 1

The dense hashtable is your ordinary textbook hashtable implementation.

The sparse hashtable stores only the elements that have actually been set, divided over a number of arrays. To quote from the comments in the implementation of sparse tables:

// The idea is that a table with (logically) t buckets is divided
// into t/M *groups* of M buckets each.  (M is a constant set in
// GROUP_SIZE for efficiency.)  Each group is stored sparsely.
// Thus, inserting into the table causes some array to grow, which is
// slow but still constant time.  Lookup involves doing a
// logical-position-to-sparse-position lookup, which is also slow but
// constant time.  The larger M is, the slower these operations are
// but the less overhead (slightly).

To know which elements of the arrays are set, a sparse table includes a bitmap:

// To store the sparse array, we store a bitmap B, where B[i] = 1 iff
// bucket i is non-empty.  Then to look up bucket i we really look up
// array[# of 1s before i in B].  This is constant time for fixed M.

so that each element incurs an overhead of only 1 bit (in the limit).

Rameriz

Answer 2

sparsehash are a memory-efficient way of mapping keys to values (1-2 bits per key). Bloom filters can give you even fewer bits per key, but they don't attach values to keys other than outside/probably-inside, which is slightly less than a bit of information.

Saad