In Docker Desktop (for either Windows or macOS), containers do not run directly on the system kernel, they run inside a Linux VM (in the case of macOS) or inside a container within Hyper-V (in the case of WSL 2 on Windows).
This subnet is the network used for the Docker daemon environment running in the VM or Hyper-V container.
On macOS, you can enter the Docker VM and look around, using the below command.
docker run -it --rm --privileged --pid=host justincormack/nsenter1
(I'm not sure whether this command works on Windows, and I don't have a system to test it on, but you could try it and see.)
Inside the Docker VM, you can look at the network config and you will find this subnet there.
/ # ip addr show dev eth0
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 02:50:00:00:00:01 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.65.3/24 brd 192.168.65.255 scope global dynamic noprefixroute eth0
valid_lft 7019sec preferred_lft 5579sec
inet6 fe80::50:ff:fe00:1/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
/ # ip route show | grep 192.168.65
default via 192.168.65.1 dev eth0 proto dhcp src 192.168.65.3 metric 202
192.168.65.0/24 dev eth0 proto dhcp scope link src 192.168.65.3 metric 202
192.168.65.5 dev services1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.65.4
/ # cat /etc/resolv.conf
# DNS requests are forwarded to the host. DHCP DNS options are ignored.
nameserver 192.168.65.5
The containers that you lauch from this environment don't use this network, though. They are also addressed from an RFC 1918 network, but a different one, as seen below:
15: eth0@if16: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP,M-DOWN> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP
link/ether 02:42:ac:11:00:02 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 172.17.0.2/16 brd 172.17.255.255 scope global eth0
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
/ # ip route
default via 172.17.0.1 dev eth0
172.17.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link src 172.17.0.2
Here you can see that 172.17.0.0/16 is in use. That's part of the larger 172.16.0.0/12 allocation found in RFC 1918.
If the subnet you're asking about were used for containers, you would run out of addresses fairly quickly, because a /28 network only has 14 usable addresses (13, if you realize the Docker VM uses one for itself). Whereas the /16 network for containers has 65,534 usable addresses in it.