Typeahead.js - Search in multiple property values
Asked Answered
D

3

26

Please see example below.

JSFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/R7UvH/2/

How do I make typeahead.js (0.10.1) search for matches in more than one property value? Ideally, within whole data (data.title, data.desc and in all data.category[i].name)

 datumTokenizer: function(data) {
     // **search in other property values; e.g. data.title & data.desc etc..**
     return Bloodhound.tokenizers.whitespace(data.title);
 },

Whole example:

var data = [{
    title: "some title here",
    desc: "some option here",
    category: [{
        name: "category 1",
    }, {
        name: "categoy 2",
    }]
},
{
    title: "some title here",
    desc: "some option here",
    category: [{
        name: "category 1",
    }, {
        name: "categoy 2",
    }]
}];

var posts = new Bloodhound({
    datumTokenizer: function(data) {
        // **search in other property values; e.g. data.title & data.desc etc..**
        return Bloodhound.tokenizers.whitespace(data.title);
    },
    queryTokenizer: Bloodhound.tokenizers.whitespace,
    local: data
});
posts.initialize();

$('#search-input').typeahead({
    highlight: true
}, {
    name: 'Pages',
    displayKey: 'title',
    source: posts.ttAdapter(),
    templates: {
        header: '<h3>Pages</h3>'
    }
});
Doronicum answered 18/2, 2014 at 10:21 Comment(0)
T
31

Typeahead 0.10.3 added "support to object tokenizers for multiple property tokenization."

So, your example becomes

var posts = new Bloodhound({
    datumTokenizer: Bloodhound.tokenizers.obj.whitespace('title', 'desc'),
    queryTokenizer: Bloodhound.tokenizers.whitespace,
    local: data
});

However, I don't think this will work for properties nested inside, that is, the data.category object in your case.

As a side note, if you are using prefetched data, be sure to clear the local storage first, otherwise the new tokenizer won't take effect (Because datumTokenizer is used when adding to the search index, and if data is already present in localStorage, then the search index will not be updated). I was stuck on this for a while!

Talishatalisman answered 29/9, 2014 at 8:40 Comment(3)
kept working on @timothy solution for days but it did not work for me. This solution works and is more elegant.Oke
Great solution, thanks. Side note, you can prevent prefetch caching with prefetch: { cache: false, ... }Wantage
This works, but alert: You must specify the properties in the order they appear in the data's schema; otherwise, it won't work. I think this is a bug in the typeahead since it's astonishing to the user.Threatt
D
14

return Bloodhound.tokenizers.whitespace(data.title) returns an array of strings.

So, instead of returning that value: save it (and your other desired values), then concatenate them and return that value...

x = Bloodhound.tokenizers.whitespace(data.title);
y = Bloodhound.tokenizers.whitespace(data.desc);
z = Bloodhound.tokenizers.whitespace(data.category[i].name);
return x.concat(y).concat(z);
Diagram answered 4/4, 2014 at 14:4 Comment(0)
T
7

I've implemented a solution here:

http://jsfiddle.net/Fresh/4nnnG/

As you have a local datasource you need to create individual datasets to enable you to match on multiple data properties. e.g.

$('#search-input').typeahead({
    highlight: true
}, {
    name: 'titles',
    displayKey: 'title',
    source: titles.ttAdapter()
}, {
    name: 'descs',
    displayKey: 'desc',
    source: descs.ttAdapter()
}, {
    name: 'cats',
    displayKey: 'name',
    source: cats.ttAdapter()
});
Tradeswoman answered 18/2, 2014 at 22:58 Comment(3)
@NullSoulException :DTradeswoman
@Fresh thanks for taking the time, it is slightly more complicated than I initially presented. I am using multiple sources (which are categorized with headers -exactly the same as per typeahead.js multi source demo twitter.github.io/typeahead.js/examples). Can you point me to an example of the filter usage? Please note that I want to keep the categorization with headers (media, pages, posts). thanksDoronicum
I've been looking into the way filter() and what I thought would help you wouldn't work i.e. build up a list of tokens within the filter. I think you should implement a solution using the way I suggested in my answer, except you'll need to add the categorization headers as you suggested. Hope you find a solution and I'll be interested to see it!Tradeswoman

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.