I checked the source of a few WAP sites,
but doesn't find anything different from a normal HTML page.
Can you name a few detailed points?
I checked the source of a few WAP sites,
but doesn't find anything different from a normal HTML page.
Can you name a few detailed points?
Well, WAP/WML is very strict when it comes to markup because the page needs to be compiled before delivery to the client device.
As for specifics,
text/vnd.wap.wml
MIME typeWAP 1 has almost nothing in common with the HTML/CSS/JS/server-side-scripting stack. The only connection it has with the larger web is that telco gateways use HTTP to request WML content from a normal web server. WML is an old-fashioned and ugly ‘card’-based hypertext system which everyone hated, largely failed in the market and is long gone (thank goodness).
The misleadingly-named “WAP 2”, on the other hand is just XHTML Mobile Profile (a somewhat limited subset of HTML); everything else about it is the same as the normal web stack. This makes it much easier to work with: it's possible to generate content for desktop and phones from the same templates. You may also see ‘i-XHTML’, which is a similar HTML-subset used by Docomo phones.
Either way, modern smartphones are happy rendering normal desktop-style [X]HTML, so you're not going to have to worry about any of this in the future. (Sure, there are compatibility issues, but that's nothing new, right?)
<wml>
/<card>
any more? –
Myrna Here is a table with some information about the differences : http://csc.colstate.edu/summers/Research/Wireless/WAPvsWeb.html
Another difference being WAP is almost if not totally dead, and HTML is kicking ##S :-)
© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.
html
tags? +1 for helpful info! – Myrna