How can I make a WebMethod parameter required
Asked Answered
J

3

30

We use the "start from Java" approach to creating JAX-WS 2.0 web services using the Metro 1.5 stack. When we point a standard tool like SoapUI at one of our web services it indicates that parameters to WebMethods are optional. The generated xsd shows minOccurs=0.

I need a way to make WebMethod parameters required (maybe minOccurs=1 in the xsd) in the "start from Java" approach. I would think there is a Java annotation for this, but I haven't been able to find one. The XmlElement annotation has required attribute, but XmlElement cannot be applied to WebMethod parameters.

Is there a way to make my WebMethod parameters required, short of manually editing the xsd and setting minOccurs to 1?

Janssen answered 5/2, 2010 at 20:54 Comment(0)
J
28

I've verified that Metro 2.0 does allow you to set @XmlElement(required=true) on a parameter. The generated xsd does not have minOccurs=0. It leaves minOccurs out of the generated xsd so it assumes the default value of 1.

You also have to upgrade your JDK by putting the JAX-WS 2.2 webservices-api.jar in the endorsed/ directory.

I posted the same question on the Java forums.

Thanks to jitu for both the answer and pointing out that minOccurs defaults to 1 so leaving it out of the .xsd has the desired effect.

When @XmlElement(required=true) is set on the parameter SoapUI no longer indicates that the parameter as optional.

Janssen answered 9/2, 2010 at 19:37 Comment(0)
C
6

The generated xsd shows minOccurs=0.

This is per specification: any non-primitives are optional, only primitives are required.

I need a way to make WebMethod parameters required (maybe minOccurs=1 in the xsd) in the "start from Java" approach.

This is not possible, unless you use primitives as previously mentioned.

And actually, this is one of the reasons why Java-first sucks (yeah, developers like it but it just does not work): its fragile, the contract may change(!), its doesn't give you all the control you need, it doesn't fit well with WS-Security, etc. So, indeed, contract-first is not pleasant, but at least, it works.

Con answered 6/2, 2010 at 21:40 Comment(3)
Thanks for the comments and the links. I wish those bloated web services books out there (some of which I've read - I mean waded through) would have just said this as clearly as you have.Janssen
@Dean You're welcome. And thanks for the feedback on JAX-WS 2.2 (even if this was not really in the scope of the initial question).Con
I would say that WSDL-first equally does not work. The blog you link to talks about using complex Request and Return objects for wrapping, but this presents a number of problems, such as hiding required things in the underlying fields, abuse of reuse, etc...then again, I would hold up an example of something good as using Spring and proxies to make something like a WebService appear as a simple implementation of an interface locally. Gumming up your local interface in this way is part of what keeps you from forgetting that it's a service that happens to be exposed via JAX-WS.Debrahdebrecen
J
3

Here is another discussion of this same question. According to the response Metro 2.0 supports putting @XmlElement on a method parameter which should solve my problem.

http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=385565&#385565

Metro 2.0 was released on Dec. 10, 2009 so it is no longer in EA. I'll give it a try and see if it works.

Janssen answered 9/2, 2010 at 4:33 Comment(1)
It seems to work, but the provided link is 404, any chance to get an updated source?Montalvo

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.