I have a view-scoped JSF-managed bean that's backing an xhtml view where I read one parameter from the URL using f:viewParam.
The view presents a form to the user. However, when the user submits the form by pressing the p:commandButton it seems that the view-scoped bean is recreated (I added a @PostConstruct annotation to verify this) and so doesn't remember the instance variable read from the f:viewParam (invId in the code below).
I originally navigate to the view with a GET that includes a URL parameter but the POST message that's send when the user presses the p:commandButton doesn't include the URL parameter. So I am thinking that when the JSF runtime doesn't see the URL parameter on the POST it considers this to be a different view and is recreating the JSF-managed bean. When I change the view scope to session-scoped the code works.
Here's the code:
view
<f:metadata>
<f:viewParam name="invId" value="#{registerBean.invId}"/>
</f:metadata>
<h:form id="registrationForm">
....
<p:commandButton value="register" action="#{registerBean.register}"
icon="ui-icon ui-icon-newwin" ajax="false"/>
</h:form>
backing bean
@ManagedBean
@ViewScoped
public class RegisterBean implements Serializable {
@ManagedProperty(value="#{invId}")
private String invId;
...
update
It turns out that this wasn't related to the URL parameters at all. Following BalusC advice below I removed the c:when tags my view was using (relying on rendered attributes instead for the same effect), and now the view-scoped bean is no longer recreated and the invId field is properly retained.
@ManagedProperty
is misplaced, I'd get rid of it. As to the concrete problem, please show the smallest possible view snippet which reproduces exactly this problem by just copypasting. A view scoped bean will namely be recreated when you bind a taghandler attribute (e.g.<c:if>
,<ui:include>
, etc) to a property of it, but this is not visible in the code posted so far, which seems to be too oversimplified. You need to provide exactly the desired information so that the problem is reproducable on a completely blank project with everything set to defaults, also by yourself. – Chairwoman