I've been trying to use the std::format
function included in C++20. As far as I can tell, clang 14 is supposed to support this feature, but for some reason I am receiving the following error: no member named 'format' in namespace 'std'
. According to cppreference's compiler support chart, text formatting should be supported by clang, but I'm still receiving this error. I'm at a loss for what the issue is.
According to this, text formatting should be supported by clang
If you look closely, there is an asterisk in that cell:
14*
Below, it says:
*
- hover over the version number to see notes
And when you hover, it says:
The paper is implemented but still marked as an incomplete feature. Not yet implemented LWG-issues will cause API and ABI breakage.
What's unsaid is that incomplete features are not enabled by default. But that makes sense since they wouldn't want users to depend on an API/ABI that will break. In my opinion, as also evidenced by this question, using green for this cell is misleading.
In conclusion, it's best to use the third party formatting library until the standard implementation of text formatting is complete, stable and non-experimental in major language implementations.
Other caveats:
- You must include the header that defines
std::format
. - Clang doesn't use C++20 by default, so you must specify it explicitly.
- Clang uses libstdc++ standard library on Linux by default (for compatibility with shared libraries), so in such case you won't be using the Clang's standard library by default, and libstdc++ hasn't implemented text formatting yet.
std::format
is not complete in libc++ 14 so is disabled by default. You need to pass the LIBCXX_ENABLE_INCOMPLETE_FEATURES
parameter when building llvm to enable the feature.
std::format
is now fully available in libc++17.
If you can't use the latest verson of libc++ can use https://github.com/fmtlib/fmt.
According to this, text formatting should be supported by clang
If you look closely, there is an asterisk in that cell:
14*
Below, it says:
*
- hover over the version number to see notes
And when you hover, it says:
The paper is implemented but still marked as an incomplete feature. Not yet implemented LWG-issues will cause API and ABI breakage.
What's unsaid is that incomplete features are not enabled by default. But that makes sense since they wouldn't want users to depend on an API/ABI that will break. In my opinion, as also evidenced by this question, using green for this cell is misleading.
In conclusion, it's best to use the third party formatting library until the standard implementation of text formatting is complete, stable and non-experimental in major language implementations.
Other caveats:
- You must include the header that defines
std::format
. - Clang doesn't use C++20 by default, so you must specify it explicitly.
- Clang uses libstdc++ standard library on Linux by default (for compatibility with shared libraries), so in such case you won't be using the Clang's standard library by default, and libstdc++ hasn't implemented text formatting yet.
© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.
-std=c++20
. (I'm not sure which standard the compiler uses by default i.e. if no-std
arg. is given.) – Presumption-stdlib=libc++
. – Bellinzonastd::format
is implemented (with the limitations mentioned when you hover over the version number) in libc++ but not in libstdc++. Which one are you using with Clang? Assuming both are installed you can switch between them with-stdlib=libc++
/-stdlib=libstdc++
. – Smolderstd::format
libc++ does, are you using it or libstdc++ or some other standard library? Are you using real clang or Apple clang? Please show a minimal reproducible example – Concussionstd::format
in clang-14 libc++, so looks like it is godbolt uses a wrong libc++? – Apprehension-fexperimental-library
might also do the trick in some cases – Bassinet