I need multiple cases in switch statement in JavaScript, Something like:
switch (varName)
{
case "afshin", "saeed", "larry":
alert('Hey');
break;
default:
alert('Default case');
break;
}
How can I do that? If there's no way to do something like that in JavaScript, I want to know an alternative solution that also follows the DRY concept.
Use the fall-through feature of the switch statement. A matched case will run until a break (or the end of the switch statement) is found, so you could write it like:
switch (varName)
{
case "afshin":
case "saeed":
case "larry":
alert('Hey');
break;
default:
alert('Default case');
}
switch('10') { case 1, '10': console.log('ok') } prints ok –
Trifocal switch(1). The label here is just a comma expression. –
Rissa break at the every end of the statement redundant? –
Zolnay break in the default case is redundant) –
Chanda break out of the answer as I think it's a matter of personal preference - a lot of people would advocate including a break on every case, even default, and I suspect kennytm knew what he intended. –
Chanda This works in regular JavaScript:
function theTest(val) {
var answer = "";
switch( val ) {
case 1: case 2: case 3:
answer = "Low";
break;
case 4: case 5: case 6:
answer = "Mid";
break;
case 7: case 8: case 9:
answer = "High";
break;
default:
answer = "Massive or Tiny?";
}
return answer;
}
theTest(9);
case (1||2||3): is equivalent to case 1: (since 1||2||3 evaluates to 1). –
Betteanne (1||2||3): doesn't work. –
Plumate Here's different approach avoiding the switch statement altogether:
var cases = {
afshin: function() { alert('hey'); },
_default: function() { alert('default'); }
};
cases.larry = cases.saeed = cases.afshin;
cases[ varName ] ? cases[ varName ]() : cases._default();
switch ... case. It's too easy to forget a break statement, and if you use fall through intentionally, those forgotten break statements can be very hard to spot. This method lookup version also has lots of great features that switch ... case lacks, such as dynamic extensibility, or the ability to completely replace the object to accomplish mode switching. It's also easier to keep cleanly organized, and can lead to more maintainable code. See ericleads.com/2012/12/switch-case-considered-harmful –
Pectoralis //fallthrough in place of break whenever I intentionally omit the break. That helps to identify when it's a mistake and when it's intentional. –
Antonomasia switch is antipattern in my book. This is not complicated at all, on the contrary, it is a common alternative, and obviously better for maintainability and refactoring, as you can now move the cases around, because you got expressions, not statements. –
Trella (cases[varName] || cases._default)(): –
Kristin In Javascript to assign multiple cases in a switch, we have to define different case without break inbetween like given below:
<script>
function checkHere(varName){
switch (varName)
{
case "saeed":
case "larry":
case "afshin":
alert('Hey');
break;
case "ss":
alert('ss');
break;
default:
alert('Default case');
break;
}
}
</script>
Please see example click on link
I like this for clarity and a DRY syntax.
varName = "larry";
switch (true)
{
case ["afshin", "saeed", "larry"].includes(varName) :
alert('Hey');
break;
default:
alert('Default case');
}
if (true) you're saying if ("true" == "true") –
Desperate If you're using ES6, you can do this:
if (['afshin', 'saeed', 'larry'].includes(varName)) {
alert('Hey');
} else {
alert('Default case');
}
Or for earlier versions of JavaScript, you can do this:
if (['afshin', 'saeed', 'larry'].indexOf(varName) !== -1) {
alert('Hey');
} else {
alert('Default case');
}
Note that includes won't work in some browser including older IE versions, but you could patch things up fairly easily. See the question determine if string is in list in javascript for more information.
includes word? Take your pick. –
Kristin if (\n'afshin', 'saeed', 'larry'\n).includes(varName). A switch typically is only needed when there are multiple cases to check for, and using it for just a single case seems mismatched to its purpose. –
Kristin My situation was something akin to:
switch (text) {
case SOME_CONSTANT || ANOTHER_CONSTANT:
console.log('Case 1 entered');
break;
case THIRD_CONSTANT || FINAL_CONSTANT:
console.log('Case 2 entered');
break;
default:
console.log('Default entered');
}
The default case always entered. If you're running into a similar multi-case switch statement issue, you're looking for this:
switch (text) {
case SOME_CONSTANT:
case ANOTHER_CONSTANT:
console.log('Case 1 entered');
break;
case THIRD_CONSTANT:
case FINAL_CONSTANT:
console.log('Case 2 entered');
break;
default:
console.log('Default entered');
}
Adding and clarifying Stefano's answer, you can use expressions to dynamically set the values for the conditions in switch, e.g.:
var i = 3
switch (i) {
case ((i>=0 && i<=5) ? i : -1):
console.log('0-5');
break;
case 6: console.log('6');
}
So in your problem, you could do something like:
var varName = "afshin"
switch (varName) {
case (["afshin", "saeed", "larry"].indexOf(varName)+1 && varName):
console.log("hey");
break;
default:
console.log('Default case');
}
Although it is so much DRY...
varName inside the case expression, expect that varName is cached thou. –
Hovercraft In Node.js it appears that you are allowed to do this:
data = "10";
switch(data){
case "1": case "2": case "3": // Put multiple cases on the same
// line to save vertical space.
console.log("small");
break;
case "10": case "11": case "12":
console.log("large");
break;
default:
console.log("strange");
break;
}
This makes for much more compact code in some cases.
Here is one more easy-to-use switch case statement. which can fulfill your requirement. We can use the find method in the switch statement to get the desire output.
switch(varname){
case["afshin","saeed","larry"].find(name => name === varname):
alert("Hey")
break;
default:
alert('Default case');
break;
}
I use it like this:
switch (true){
case /Pressure/.test(sensor):
{
console.log('Its pressure!');
break;
}
case /Temperature/.test(sensor):
{
console.log('Its temperature!');
break;
}
}
g flag, since you're only using the regexes once and throwing them away. In fact, if you were keeping them outside the function, the g flag would harm you by trying to match from a non-0 index on subsequent .test(s. I also fixed a typo where the switch case was on sensor variable and not true constant for matching boolean expressions. See the edit. –
Venosity case /officedocument/.test(type) && /presentation/.test(type): iconClass = "far fa-file-powerpoint red"; break; –
Torero Some interesting methods. For me the best way to solve is using .find.
You can give an indication of what the multiple cases are by using a suitable name inside your find function.
switch (varName)
{
case ["afshin", "saeed", "larry"].find(firstName => firstName === varName):
alert('Hey');
break;
default:
alert('Default case');
break;
}
Other answers are more suitable for the given example but if you have multiple cases to me this is the best way.
You can use the 'in' operator...
It relies on the object/hash invocation, so it's as fast as JavaScript can be.
// Assuming you have defined functions f(), g(a) and h(a,b)
// somewhere in your code,
// you can define them inside the object, but...
// the code becomes hard to read. I prefer it this way.
o = { f1:f, f2:g, f3:h };
// If you use "STATIC" code can do:
o['f3']( p1, p2 )
// If your code is someway "DYNAMIC", to prevent false invocations
// m brings the function/method to be invoked (f1, f2, f3)
// and you can rely on arguments[] to solve any parameter problems.
if ( m in o ) o[m]()
It depends. Switch evaluates once and only once. Upon a match, all subsequent case statements until 'break' fire no matter what the case says.
var onlyMen = true;
var onlyWomen = false;
var onlyAdults = false;
(function(){
switch (true){
case onlyMen:
console.log ('onlymen');
case onlyWomen:
console.log ('onlyWomen');
case onlyAdults:
console.log ('onlyAdults');
break;
default:
console.log('default');
}
})(); // returns onlymen onlywomen onlyadults<script src="https://getfirebug.com/firebug-lite-debug.js"></script>switch is a variation of the (in)famous goto statement. The idea is that you go to one of these labels, and then continue. That is, the labels represent entry points; if you want to exit, you have to do it yourself, with either the break statement or possibly a return statement if you’re inside a function. –
Clishmaclaver You can do this:
alert([
"afshin",
"saeed",
"larry",
"sasha",
"boby",
"jhon",
"anna",
// ...
].includes(varName)? 'Hey' : 'Default case')
or just a single line of code:
alert(["afshin", "saeed", "larry",...].includes(varName)? 'Hey' : 'Default case')
a little improvement from ErikE's answer
I can see there are lots of good answers here, but what happens if we need to check more than 10 cases? Here is my own approach:
function isAccessible(varName){
let accessDenied = ['Liam', 'Noah', 'William', 'James', 'Logan', 'Benjamin',
'Mason', 'Elijah', 'Oliver', 'Jacob', 'Daniel', 'Lucas'];
switch (varName) {
case (accessDenied.includes(varName) ? varName : null):
return 'Access Denied!';
default:
return 'Access Allowed.';
}
}
console.log(isAccessible('Liam'));
if (accessDenied.includes(varName)) return 'Access Denied!'; return 'Access Allowed.' is more than enough. –
Venosity The problem with the above approaches, is that you have to repeat the several cases every time you call the function which has the switch. A more robust solution is to have a map or a dictionary.
Here is an example:
// The Map, divided by concepts
var dictionary = {
timePeriod: {
'month': [1, 'monthly', 'mensal', 'mês'],
'twoMonths': [2, 'two months', '2 months', 'bimestral', 'bimestre'],
'trimester': [3, 'trimesterly', 'quarterly', 'trimestral'],
'semester': [4, 'semesterly', 'semestral', 'halfyearly'],
'year': [5, 'yearly', 'annual', 'ano']
},
distance: {
'km': [1, 'kms', 'kilometre', 'kilometers', 'kilometres'],
'mile': [2, 'mi', 'miles'],
'nordicMile': [3, 'Nordic mile', 'mil (10 km)', 'Scandinavian mile']
},
fuelAmount: {
'ltr': [1, 'l', 'litre', 'Litre', 'liter', 'Liter'],
'gal (imp)': [2, 'imp gallon', 'imperial gal', 'gal (UK)'],
'gal (US)': [3, 'US gallon', 'US gal'],
'kWh': [4, 'KWH']
}
};
// This function maps every input to a certain defined value
function mapUnit (concept, value) {
for (var key in dictionary[concept]) {
if (key === value ||
dictionary[concept][key].indexOf(value) !== -1) {
return key
}
}
throw Error('Uknown "'+value+'" for "'+concept+'"')
}
// You would use it simply like this
mapUnit("fuelAmount", "ltr") // => ltr
mapUnit("fuelAmount", "US gal") // => gal (US)
mapUnit("fuelAmount", 3) // => gal (US)
mapUnit("distance", "kilometre") // => km
// Now you can use the switch statement safely without the need
// to repeat the combinations every time you call the switch
var foo = 'monthly'
switch (mapUnit ('timePeriod', foo)) {
case 'month':
console.log('month')
break
case 'twoMonths':
console.log('twoMonths')
break
case 'trimester':
console.log('trimester')
break
case 'semester':
console.log('semester')
break
case 'year':
console.log('year')
break
default:
throw Error('error')
}One of the possible solutions is:
const names = {
afshin: 'afshin',
saeed: 'saeed',
larry: 'larry'
};
switch (varName) {
case names[varName]: {
alert('Hey');
break;
}
default: {
alert('Default case');
break;
}
}
if (["triangle", "circle", "rectangle"].indexOf(base.type) > -1)
{
//Do something
}else if (["areaMap", "irregular", "oval"].indexOf(base.type) > -1)
{
//Do another thing
}
You can do that for multiple values with the same result
If your case conditions are complex, many case value matches, or dynamic value match required, then it may be best to move that case matching logic to handler child functions.
In your case, if say you had thousands of usernames to match against for a security permissions check for example, this method is cleaner option, more extensible, exposing the high level multi-way branch logic without getting swamped in a long list of case statements.
switch (varName)
{
case checkPatternAdministrator(varName):
alert('Hey');
break;
case checkPatternUserTypeA(varName):
alert('Hey2');
break;
case checkPatternUserTypeB(varName):
alert('Hey3');
break;
default:
alert('Default case');
break;
}
function checkPatternAdministrator(varName) {
// Logic to check Names against list, account permissions etc.
// return the varName if a match is found, or blank string if not
var matchedAdministratorName = varName;
return matchedAdministratorName;
}
Another way of doing multiple cases in a switch statement, when inside a function:
function name(varName){
switch (varName) {
case 'afshin':
case 'saeed':
case 'larry':
return 'Hey';
default:
return 'Default case';
}
}
console.log(name('afshin')); // HeyJust change the switch condition approach:
switch (true) {
case (function(){ return true; })():
alert('true');
break;
case (function(){ return false; })():
alert('false');
break;
default:
alert('default');
}
(expression) in parenthesis, and the return value must be the input. See my answer –
Haveman switch(true) { case (var1 === 0 && var2 === true): {} } –
Chantry The switch statement is used to select one of many code blocks to execute based on a condition
syntax:
switch(expression) {
case x:
// code block
break;
case y:
// code block
break;
default:
// code block
}
NOTE: It must be noted that if the break statement is omitted then the next block will be executed as well even if they does not match with switch expression. So don't forget to add the break statement at the end of each code block if you don't want to get the specified behaviour
A practical example: the following code returns the current day of the week in strings based on an integer (provided by 'new Date().getDay()')
switch (new Date().getDay()) {
case 0:
day = "Sunday";
break;
case 1:
day = "Monday";
break;
case 2:
day = "Tuesday";
break;
case 3:
day = "Wednesday";
break;
case 4:
day = "Thursday";
break;
case 5:
day = "Friday";
break;
case 6:
day = "Saturday";
}
the code samples were taken from W3Schools
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<title>Example1</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="css/style.css" >
<script src="js/jquery-1.11.3.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script>
function display_case(){
var num = document.getElementById('number').value;
switch(num){
case (num = "1"):
document.getElementById("result").innerHTML = "You select day Sunday";
break;
case (num = "2"):
document.getElementById("result").innerHTML = "You select day Monday";
break;
case (num = "3"):
document.getElementById("result").innerHTML = "You select day Tuesday";
break;
case (num = "4"):
document.getElementById("result").innerHTML = "You select day Wednesday";
break;
case (num = "5"):
document.getElementById("result").innerHTML = "You select day Thusday";
break;
case (num = "6"):
document.getElementById("result").innerHTML = "You select day Friday";
break;
case (num = "7"):
document.getElementById("result").innerHTML = "You select day Saturday";
break;
default:
document.getElementById("result").innerHTML = "You select day Invalid Weekday";
break
}
}
</script>
</head>
<body>
<center>
<div id="error"></div>
<center>
<h2> Switch Case Example </h2>
<p>Enter a Number Between 1 to 7</p>
<input type="text" id="number" />
<button onclick="display_case();">Check</button><br />
<div id="result"><b></b></div>
</center>
</center>
</body>
switch statement is supposed to work. It’s just case "1":, not case (num = "1"):. –
Narceine document.getElementById("result").innerHTML = ....outside the switch and add the day value result at the end? –
Prong num but it still works because the switch has already been evaluated and the assignment yields the value. This is programming by mutation/machine learning at its finest. –
Venosity You could write it like this:
switch (varName)
{
case "afshin":
case "saeed":
case "larry":
alert('Hey');
break;
default:
alert('Default case');
break;
}
For me this is the simplest way:
switch (["afshin","saeed","larry"].includes(varName) ? 1 : 2) {
case 1:
alert('Hey');
break;
default:
alert('Default case');
break;
}
if statement. –
Narceine © 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.