Use a list of values to select rows from a Pandas dataframe
Asked Answered
S

8

1348

Let’s say I have the following Pandas dataframe:

df = DataFrame({'A' : [5,6,3,4], 'B' : [1,2,3, 5]})
df

     A   B
0    5   1
1    6   2
2    3   3
3    4   5

I can subset based on a specific value:

x = df[df['A'] == 3]
x

     A   B
2    3   3

But how can I subset based on a list of values? - something like this:

list_of_values = [3,6]

y = df[df['A'] in list_of_values]

To get:

     A    B
1    6    2
2    3    3
Stahl answered 23/8, 2012 at 16:31 Comment(1)
Does this answer your question? How to filter Pandas dataframe using 'in' and 'not in' like in SQLStrega
R
2218

You can use the isin method:

In [1]: df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [5,6,3,4], 'B': [1,2,3,5]})

In [2]: df
Out[2]:
   A  B
0  5  1
1  6  2
2  3  3
3  4  5

In [3]: df[df['A'].isin([3, 6])]
Out[3]:
   A  B
1  6  2
2  3  3

And to get the opposite use ~:

In [4]: df[~df['A'].isin([3, 6])]
Out[4]:
   A  B
0  5  1
3  4  5
Residence answered 23/8, 2012 at 19:20 Comment(0)
G
98

You can use the method query:

df.query('A in [6, 3]')
# df.query('A == [6, 3]')

or

lst = [6, 3]
df.query('A in @lst')
# df.query('A == @lst')
Grayback answered 3/5, 2021 at 5:7 Comment(5)
i wonder if query() is computationally better than isin() functionHouston
@Houston According to Pandas docs: "DataFrame.query() using numexpr is slightly faster than Python for large frames."Grayback
@Houston I did a little test and query is faster than boolean indexing for dataframes with >10k rows (check this answer for more info).Spectroradiometer
how to control for case sensitivity with query? In case you are searching strings.Venatic
@Venatic You can use df.query('A.str.lower() in @lst')Grayback
S
26

list_of_values doesn't have to be a list; it can be set, tuple, dictionary, numpy array, pandas Series, generator, range etc. and isin() and query() will still work.

A note on query():

  • You can also call isin() inside query():
    list_of_values = [3, 6]
    df.query("A.isin(@list_of_values)")
    
  • You can pass a values to search over as a local_dict argument, which is useful if you don't want to create the filtering list beforehand in a chain of function calls:
    df.query("A == @lst", local_dict={'lst': [3, 6]})
    

Some common problems with selecting rows

1. list_of_values is a range

If you need to filter within a range, you can use between() method or query().

list_of_values = [3, 4, 5, 6] # a range of values

df[df['A'].between(3, 6)]  # or
df.query('3<=A<=6')

2. Return df in the order of list_of_values

In the OP, the values in list_of_values don't appear in that order in df. If you want df to return in the order they appear in list_of_values, i.e. "sort" by list_of_values, use loc.

list_of_values = [3, 6]
df.set_index('A').loc[list_of_values].reset_index()

If you want to retain the old index, you can use the following.

list_of_values = [3, 6, 3]
df.reset_index().set_index('A').loc[list_of_values].reset_index().set_index('index').rename_axis(None)

3. Don't use apply

In general, isin() and query() are the best methods for this task; there's no need for apply(). For example, for function f(A) = 2*A - 5 on column A, both isin() and query() work much more efficiently:

df[(2*df['A']-5).isin(list_of_values)]         # or
df[df['A'].mul(2).sub(5).isin(list_of_values)] # or
df.query("A.mul(2).sub(5) in @list_of_values")

4. Select rows not in list_of_values

To select rows not in list_of_values, negate isin()/in:

df[~df['A'].isin(list_of_values)]
df.query("A not in @list_of_values")  # df.query("A != @list_of_values")

5. Select rows where multiple columns are in list_of_values

If you want to filter using both (or multiple) columns, there's any() and all() to reduce columns (axis=1) depending on the need.

  1. Select rows where at least one of A or B is in list_of_values:
    df[df[['A','B']].isin(list_of_values).any(1)]
    df.query("A in @list_of_values or B in @list_of_values")
    
  2. Select rows where both of A and B are in list_of_values:
    df[df[['A','B']].isin(list_of_values).all(1)] 
    df.query("A in @list_of_values and B in @list_of_values")
    
Spectroradiometer answered 2/7, 2022 at 20:37 Comment(0)
P
14

You can store your values in a list as:

lis = [3,6]

then

df1 = df[df['A'].isin(lis)]

Popcorn answered 26/5, 2022 at 4:34 Comment(2)
What's the difference between top answer?Balzer
if you have more values to filter, it is better to store them as list and filter that list from the main dataframe.Popcorn
M
10

Another method;

df.loc[df.apply(lambda x: x.A in [3,6], axis=1)]

Unlike the isin method, this is particularly useful in determining if the list contains a function of the column A. For example, f(A) = 2*A - 5 as the function;

df.loc[df.apply(lambda x: 2*x.A-5 in [3,6], axis=1)]

It should be noted that this approach is slower than the isin method.

Mounts answered 24/5, 2021 at 15:8 Comment(0)
M
4

Its trickier with f-Strings

list_of_values = [3,6]


df.query(f'A in {list_of_values}')
Megacycle answered 8/10, 2022 at 18:29 Comment(0)
B
3

The above answers are correct, but if you still are not able to filter out rows as expected, make sure both DataFrames' columns have the same dtype.

source = source.astype({1: 'int64'})
to_rem = to_rem.astype({'some col': 'int64'})

works = source[~source[1].isin(to_rem['some col'])]

Took me long enough.

Blueness answered 19/10, 2022 at 8:28 Comment(0)
O
1

A non pandas solution that compares in terms of speed may be:

filtered_column = set(df.A) - set(list_list_of_values)
Odoacer answered 20/10, 2022 at 14:1 Comment(0)

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.