Unable to create an object of type 'MyContext'. For the different patterns supported at design time
Asked Answered
B

21

32

I have ConsoleApplication on .NET Core and also I added my DbContext to dependencies, but howewer I have an error:

Unable to create an object of type 'MyContext'. For the different patterns supported at design time, see https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=851728

I've added: var context = host.Services.GetRequiredService<MyContext>(); Also I've added private readonly DbContextOptions<MyContext> _opts; in my Post Class:

using (MyContext db = new MyContext(_opts))
{
    db.Posts.Add(postData);
    db.SaveChanges();
}

This how I added service:

.ConfigureServices((context, services) =>
{
    services.Configure<DataOptions>(opts =>
        context.Configuration.GetSection(nameof(DataOptions)).Bind(opts)
    );
    services.AddDbContext<MyContext>((provider, builder) =>
        builder.UseSqlite(provider.GetRequiredService<IOptions<DataOptions>>().Value.ConnectionString)
    );
});

And this is my Context:

public sealed class MyContext : DbContext
{
    private readonly DbContextOptions<MyContext> _options;
    
    public DbSet<PostData> Posts { get; set; }
    public DbSet<VoteData> Votes { get; set; }
    
    
    public MyContext(DbContextOptions<MyContext> options) : base(options)
    {
        _options = options;
    }
    
    protected override void OnConfiguring(DbContextOptionsBuilder optionsBuilder)
    {
        if (!optionsBuilder.IsConfigured)
        {
            optionsBuilder.UseSqlite("ConnectionString");
        }
    }
}

I tried add-migration and has this error

What I do wrong?

Breannebrear answered 1/9, 2019 at 11:9 Comment(0)
P
58

I Resolved this by just adding a plain constructor to my Context

public class DataContext : DbContext
{
    public DataContext()
    {
    }

    public DataContext(DbContextOptions options) : base(options)
    {
    }

    protected override void OnConfiguring(DbContextOptionsBuilder options)
    {
        if (!options.IsConfigured)
        {
            options.UseSqlServer("A FALLBACK CONNECTION STRING");
        }
    }
    
    protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder)
    {
        base.OnModelCreating(modelBuilder);            
    }
}
Polly answered 25/6, 2020 at 9:8 Comment(0)
G
28

I came across this problem today. In my case, the SqlDbContext was in a separate ASP.Net Core 3.1 class library project, and I was trying to setup migrations using the dotnet CLI from that project's root folder. The main web application, which is the default project, contains the connection string configuration inside the appsettings.json and the startup configurations therefore I had to specify the startup project path using the -s switch as follows.

>dotnet ef migrations add initialcreation -s ..\MyWebApp\MyWebApp.csproj

-s, short for startup project, is a quick alternative to implementing IDesignTimeDbContextFactory when the DbContext is in a different project than the web application project.

Giaimo answered 29/5, 2020 at 17:53 Comment(0)
D
8

The quick solution to the problem is to implement the default constructor in your context

 public MyContext() : base()
 {
 }

The problem with this solution is that you will have to enter the connection string in the 'OnConfiguring' function explicitly, which is not recommended

 protected override void OnConfiguring(DbContextOptionsBuilder optionsBuilder)
 {
        if (!optionsBuilder.IsConfigured)
        {
            optionsBuilder.UseSqlite("ConnectionString");
        }
 }
Disherison answered 29/2, 2020 at 22:2 Comment(0)
P
5

This is not an answer for this specific question's code, but this is for the error message.

A possible fix would be the order of constructors. If your DbContext has multiple constructors, make sure that the empty constructor is on top

Not Correctly Ordered DbContext constructors throw error Correctly Ordered DbContext constructors work correctly

Pewit answered 27/10, 2022 at 13:26 Comment(0)
P
4

I've had same problem as You. Maybe it was not for a Console Application but error was the same. So i thought that it is worth to share with my answer. I was using NET Core 3.0 and to fix the problem I have to change the IHostBuilder into IWebHost and then everything was fine. The problem was in class Program.

public static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        CreateHostBuilder(args).Build().Run();
    }

    public static IHostBuilder CreateHostBuilder(string[] args) =>
        Host.CreateDefaultBuilder(args)
            .ConfigureWebHostDefaults(webBuilder =>
            {
                webBuilder.UseStartup<Startup>();
            });

into

public static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        BuildWebHost(args).Run();
    }

    public static IWebHost BuildWebHost(string[] args) =>
    WebHost.CreateDefaultBuilder(args)
        .UseStartup<Startup>()
        .Build();
Piquant answered 22/10, 2019 at 20:36 Comment(0)
K
3

In my case problem was that I has multiple startup projects selected. selected one and it was fixed

Kirstiekirstin answered 8/5, 2022 at 12:55 Comment(0)
F
2

Kindly check your connection string also in appsetting,json.

Folklore answered 22/3, 2020 at 20:42 Comment(0)
S
2

This applies to ASP .NET or .NET console applications using .NET Core 3.1.

In my case it was ASPNET Core and I had the same reported problem after upgrading my application from 2.1 to 3.1. The answer provided by @Matt lead me to a solution that works and allows me to continue using the new Generic Host. The Web Host remains only for backward compatibility.

The documentation for Generic Host and Design-time DbContext Creation both state what needs to happen.

Your program.cs must have a CreateHostBuilder method with a signature exactly as documented. This is because the framework attempts to resolve it using Program.CreateHostBuilder(). The signature must be:

public static IHostBuilder CreateHostBuilder(string[] args)

This is what caught me out, I initially had it named CreateWebHostBuilder, a 2.1 convention; and then I didn't have the args parameter defined. Fixing these two issues immediately resolved my add-migration ... error.

The Design-time DbContext Creation documentation is quite helpful detailing how the framework attempts to resolve the DbContext and explains why other suggestions here work the way they do, e.g. parameterless constructor.

Swiftlet answered 23/4, 2020 at 4:58 Comment(0)
O
2

Hade the same problem with NET Core 3.1.

Needed to add one more constructor too solev this. Why I do not know.

Never hade to do it in the past.

public DataContext()
{            
}

public DataContext(DbContextOptions<DataContext> options)
    : base(options)
{ }
Outage answered 1/10, 2020 at 20:59 Comment(1)
Or remove both as they do nothing ;-) (EF Tools / Migration uses DI behind scenes)Apostasy
W
1

Ensure you have added DbContext to your services in Startup class

Wein answered 3/7, 2021 at 5:45 Comment(0)
T
1

In my case at .Net 7 the problem was at the program.cs.

AddDbContext was after WebApplication.Build() and it should be before Build (just a mistake).

Incorrect:

using var app = builder.Build();

services.AddDbContext<DatabaseContext>(opt => opt
            .UseSqlServer("<Connection-String>"));

Correct:

services.AddDbContext<DatabaseContext>(opt => opt
            .UseSqlServer("<Connection-String>"));

using var app = builder.Build();
Tightwad answered 3/1, 2023 at 6:1 Comment(0)
L
1

if you using the macOS platform, you must set up the startup project.

 dotnet ef --startup-project ../NLayer.API/ migrations add Initial

For Database Update

dotnet ef --startup-project ../NLayer.API/ database update
Lobar answered 5/11, 2023 at 18:55 Comment(0)
P
0

In my case, I had two startup project in my solution, so setting the project that has the connection string as the only startup project fixed the issue

Peisch answered 27/4, 2020 at 11:42 Comment(0)
B
0

I resolve this issue by this way:

    public DbSet<PostData> Posts { get; set; }
    public DbSet<VoteData> Votes { get; set; }

    public MyContext(DbContextOptions options) : base(options) { Database.EnsureCreated(); }

    protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder)
    {
        modelBuilder.ApplyConfigurationsFromAssembly(typeof(MyContext).Assembly);
    }
Breannebrear answered 29/6, 2020 at 12:9 Comment(0)
T
0

In my case with Net Core 3.1 (PostgreSQL) Solved it by removing "AddUserStore"

 services.AddIdentity<User, IdentityRole<int>>()
                .AddEntityFrameworkStores<MyDBContext>()
                //.AddUserStore<MyDBContext>()
                .AddDefaultTokenProviders();
Taxi answered 14/7, 2022 at 2:20 Comment(0)
L
0

I had this problem in .NET 6. In program.cs, you should put var app = builder.Build(); after Services.AddDbContext and connectionString.

Luben answered 2/8, 2022 at 9:10 Comment(0)
M
0
  1. In my case, my database connection string was wrong, I gave wrong database password, which caused this problem. So, check your connection string in appsettings, json as well.
  2. Make sure to set your web or api project as Set as Startup Project. Do not use multiple startup project.
  3. In Package Manager Console, set your data access layer (if any) as a default project
  4. Then run the command again
Mooned answered 22/1, 2023 at 1:5 Comment(0)
H
0

If someone still uses this alternative to know why it gives them this error.

It is because there is an error in the configurations of the keys or constraints of the tables.

You can use dotnet ef database update --verbose, to know the error that was generated with the migrations.

Helaine answered 25/1, 2023 at 22:23 Comment(0)
V
0

You need to add this in the Program.cs file

builder.Services.AddDbContext<DataContext>(options => {
options.UseSqlServer(builder.Configuration.GetConnectionString("DefaultConnection")); });

and this is appsettings.json

"ConnectionStrings": {
"DefaultConnection" :  "server=localhost\\sqlexpress;database=superherodb;trusted_connection=true"  },
Vocational answered 25/7, 2023 at 15:0 Comment(0)
K
0

I had the same problem in my project. I forgot to add the DbContext in my Program.cs file. I added the following code and it worked for me:

builder.Services.AddDbContext<DataContext>(options =>
{
    options.UseSqlServer(builder.Configuration
        .GetConnectionString("DefaultConnection"));
});

Screenshot of Program.cs 1

And in my "appsettings.json" file:

"ConnectionStrings": {
"DefaultConnection": "Data Source=YOUR_SERVER_HERE;Initial Catalog=YOUR_DB_HERE;Integrated Security=True"

}

Kyte answered 30/11, 2023 at 13:31 Comment(0)
M
0

I encountered a similar issue and had a similar project structure, as mentioned by @Rajeesh. In my setup, the main web application, which serves as the default project, contains the connection string configuration inside the appsettings.json file. Additionally, it references the Infrastructure project, where the partial class DataContext : DbContext class is located.

There are two ways to handle migrations:

  1. Using Command Prompt:

C:\\MyWebAppFolder\MyWebAppProject.Infrastructure > dotnet ef migrations add MigrationName -s ..\MyWebAppFolder\MyWebAppProject.csproj

Important is to mention that you start your Command Prompt in Admin mode, and execute this on the path in your project where "DataContext : DbContext" class is. In my case it was ProjectName.Infrastructure project enter image description here

Run command to update DB if you want on the same Path:

C:\xxx\xx\xxx.Infrastructure> dotnet ef database update -s ..\MyWebAppFolder\MyWebAppProject.csproj
  1. Nuget Package Manager

Set StandardProject where your partial class DataContext : DbContext class is. My case Infrastructure Project: Nuget Package Manager

Important: Set your MyWebAppProject.csproj as startup project in Visual Studio other way AddMigration won't work.

Run PM> Update-Database if you want to update DB in Package Manager Console

Marga answered 2/3 at 11:38 Comment(0)

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.