Unit Testing HTTP traffic in Alamofire app
Asked Answered
M

4

34

I'm struggling a bit to figure out how to best test an app that uses Alamofire to help sync with server data.

I want to be able to test my code that uses Alamofire and processes JSON responses from a server. I'd like to mock those tests so that I can feed the expected response data to those tests without incurring real network traffic.

This blog post (http://nshipster.com/xctestcase/) describes how easy it is to Mock an object in Swift - but I'm not sure how to do that with Alamofire and its chained responses.

Would I mock the Manager? the Request? Response? Any help would be appreciated!

Merrythought answered 13/11, 2014 at 21:18 Comment(8)
Literally searching for the same thing right now...Proulx
did you figure it out?Proulx
See #10807980Ternion
@Ternion I think using the procedure of mocking objects you describe in your article would actually be a lot simpler than the other approaches in the linked SO article. It should be possible to mock an Alamofire.Request response right? I was looking through the code and couldn't figure it out right away, but I guess mocking the response(...) method would work?Carlita
@Ternion it would be great to have an article about testing with Alamofire!Olla
@ThomasKrajacic No. The Foundation URL Loading System already has this great built-in hook to mock network requests. Either use that or actually test against a staging server.Ternion
@Ternion which is the built-in hook you refer to?Olla
@Ternion Do you mean NSURLProtocol?Olla
O
23

I'm adding another answer since I've just found this approach that in my opinion is easier and really simple to read and use.

I've created a dummy Alamofire class that contains only the functions and the types necessary for tests. Now I include this file in the test target instead of the real Alamofire.

For example I've created my version of the Request class where I define a couple of static variables that I valorise depending on the test, and for this class I've implemented only the init and the responseJSON function.

public class Request {

    var request:String?
    struct response{
        static var data:NSHTTPURLResponse?
        static var json:AnyObject?
        static var error:NSError?
    }

    init (request:String){
        self.request = request
    }

    public func responseJSON(options: NSJSONReadingOptions = .AllowFragments, completionHandler: (NSURLRequest, NSHTTPURLResponse?, AnyObject?, NSError?) -> Void) -> Self {

        completionHandler(NSURLRequest(URL: NSURL(string:self.request!)!), Request.response.data, Request.response.json, Request.response.error)
        return self
    }
}

Now I can mock a response in a test:

func testMytestFunction(){
    var HTMLResponse = NSHTTPURLResponse(URL: NSURL(string: "myurl")!, statusCode: 200, HTTPVersion: "HTTP/1.1", headerFields: nil)

    Request.response.data = HTMLResponse
    Request.response.json = LoadDataFromJSONFile("MyJsonFile")

    request(.POST, "myurl", parameters: nil, encoding: ParameterEncoding.JSON).responseJSON {
        (request, response, JSON, error) -> Void in
        // the JSON and response variable now contains exactly the data that you have passed to Request.response.data and Request.response.json
    }
}

The request function is defined here:

public func request(method: Method, URLString: URLStringConvertible, parameters: [String: AnyObject]? = nil, encoding: ParameterEncoding = .URL) -> Request {

    return Request(request: URLString.URLString)
}

public func request(URLRequest: URLRequestConvertible) -> Request {

    return Request(request: "fakecall")
}
Olla answered 30/4, 2015 at 10:50 Comment(4)
Ever thought about sharing this on Github? It would probably save people some time and prove to be very usefullJaeger
you know - there's also a NSURLSession mock framework - DVR - on github github.com/venmo/DVRMerrythought
What is that request method you are calling in your testMytestFunction test?Amusing
@FergalRooney this answer is related to a very old version of Alamofire. Back at that time the whole library was implemented in a single Alamofire.swift file. I don't think it can be adopted in the new Alamofire version... anyway I add the request methods in the answer.Olla
D
9

This question is getting old, but I just encountered the same issue, and the solution is very easy when using OHHTTPStubs.

OHHTTPStubs just mocks the responses you get from NSURLSession, so it works well with Alamofire, and you get very good coverage of your code path.

For example, in your test case, just mock the response using:

OHHTTPStubs.stubRequestsPassingTest({
  (request: NSURLRequest) -> Bool in
    return request.URL!.host == "myhost.com"
  }, withStubResponse: {
  (request: NSURLRequest) -> OHHTTPStubsResponse in
    let obj = ["status": "ok", "data": "something"]
    return OHHTTPStubsResponse(JSONObject: obj, statusCode:200, headers:nil)
})
Davin answered 22/5, 2015 at 22:6 Comment(1)
how inject OHHTTPStubs to unit test., I use OHHTTPStubs in unit test, but it does not workMalposition
O
1

Waiting for an answer by @mattt I post an example of my code.

Let's say that we have a Client class that is responsible for calling a simple web service. This class implements a function called userSignIn that performs a sign in using the WS.

This is the code for the userSignIn function:

func userSignIn(
        #email:String,
        password:String,
        completionHandler: (Bool, String?, NSError?) -> Void
        )-> Void
        {

            var parameters:[String:AnyObject] = [
                "email":email,
                "password":password,
            ]


            Alamofire.request(.POST, Client.urlPath, parameters: parameters, encoding: ParameterEncoding.JSON).responseJSON {
                (request, response, JSON, responseError) -> Void in

                // Setup callback params

                // HERE WE INJECT THE "FAKE" DATA--------
                var operationComplete = false
                var accessToken:String?
                var error:NSError?
                // --------------------------------------

                if let statusCode = response?.statusCode {

                    // Check for errors and build response data
                    (operationComplete, accessToken, error) = self.checkSignInResponse(statusCode, JSON: JSON)
                }

                // Call the completion handler
                completionHandler(operationComplete, accessToken, error)
            }
    }

The aim of the function is to get a token from the web service if the information passed by the user are correct.

The function checkSignInResponse (I don't report its code since it's not useful for the answer) has the role to valorise the 3 variables operationComplete, accessToken and error depending on the JSON response received.

Now that the 3 variables have a value we call the completionHandler using them.

How to mock this function?!

To mock the response I override the userSignIn function directly into the test function (as explained by the NSHipster article).

func testUserSignIn_whenParamsAreInvalid(){

    class MockClient:Client {

        override func userSignIn(#email: String, password: String, completionHandler:
            (Bool, String?, NSError?) -> Void) {

            // Set callback params
            var operationComplete = false
            var accessToken:String? = nil
            var error:NSError? = NSError(domain: "Testing", code: 99, userInfo: nil)

            completionHandler(operationComplete, accessToken, error)
        }
    }

    signInViewController!.client = MockClient()
    signInViewController!.loadView()

    fillRegisterFieldsWithDataAndSubmit(femail(), password: fpassword())

    XCTAssertNotNil(signInViewController!.error, "Expect error to be not nil")

}

then I substitute the client inside the view controller that I'm testing using my "mocked" client. In this case I'm testing that the controller passes to the function information that are not valid so I check that the error property of the controller is not nil. To force this data I simply set operationComplete to false and I manual generate an NSError.

Does it make any sense to you? I'm not sure that this test is a good test... but at least I can verify the data flow.

Olla answered 21/4, 2015 at 15:37 Comment(0)
I
1

I believe I have a solution to this for the newer versions of Alamofire. My Swift and DI skills are a bit noob so this can probably be improved but I thought I'd share. The most challenging part of mocking Alamofire is mocking the method chaining in the Network call (request().responseJSON).

The Network call:

let networkManager: NetworkManagerProtocol!

init(_ networkManager: NetworkManagerProtocol = NetworkManagerTest(SessionManager())) {
    self.networkManager = networkManager
}

func create(_ params: [String: Any], completion: @escaping (Response<Success,Fail>) -> Void) {

    self.networkManager.manager.request(self.url!, method: .post, parameters: params, encoding: URLEncoding.default, headers: nil).responseJSON {
        response in

        if response.result.isSuccess {
            completion(Success())
        } else {
            completion(Fail())
        }
    }
}

The manager that you'll inject into the network call class: The NetworkManagerProtocol provides the get manager functionality to the various types of network managers.

class NetworkManager: NetworkManagerProtocol {
    private let sessionManager: NetworkManagerProtocol

    init(_ sessionManager: NetworkManagerProtocol) {
        self.sessionManager = sessionManager
    }

    var manager: SessionManagerProtocol {
        get {
            return sessionManager.manager
        }
        set {}
    }
}

Extend Alamofire's SessionManager class: This is where we add the protocols and custom functionality to SessionManager. Note the protocol's request method is a wrapper around Alamofire's request method .

extension SessionManager: NetworkManagerProtocol, SessionManagerProtocol {
    private static var _manager = SessionManager()

    var manager: SessionManagerProtocol {
        get {
            return SessionManager._manager
        }
        set {
            let configuration = URLSessionConfiguration.default

            SessionManager._manager = Alamofire.SessionManager(configuration: configuration, delegate: SessionManager.default.delegate)
        }
    }

    func request(_ url: URLConvertible, method: HTTPMethod, parameters: Parameters, encoding: ParameterEncoding, headers: HTTPHeaders?) -> DataRequestProtocol {
        let dataRequest: DataRequest = self.request(url, method: method, parameters: parameters, encoding: encoding, headers: headers)

        return dataRequest
    }
}

Create a SessionManagerMock for the mock api call: This class creates a SessionManagerMock object and then retrieves the mock data with its request method.

class SessionManagerMock: NetworkManagerProtocol, SessionManagerProtocol {
    private static var _manager = SessionManagerMock()

    var manager: SessionManagerProtocol {
        get {
            return SessionManagerMock._manager
        }
        set {}
    }

    func request(_ url: URLConvertible, method: HTTPMethod, parameters: Parameters, encoding: ParameterEncoding, headers: HTTPHeaders?) -> DataRequestProtocol {
        return DataRequestMock()
    }
}

Extend Alamofire's DataRequest class: And again, note the protocol's responseJSON class is a wrapper around DataRequests's responseJSON class.

extension DataRequest: DataRequestProtocol {
    func responseJSON(completionHandler: @escaping (DataResponse<Any>) -> Void) -> Self {
        return self.responseJSON(queue: nil, options: .allowFragments, completionHandler: completionHandler)
    }
}

DataRequestMock Class: This class stores the data for the mock request. It could be built out a little more (add request data, etc) but you get the idea.

class DataRequestMock: DataRequestProtocol {

    static var statusCode: Int = 200

    var dataResponse = DataResponse<Any>(
        request: nil,
        response: HTTPURLResponse(url: URL(string: "foo.baz.com")!, statusCode: DataRequestMock.statusCode, httpVersion: "1.1", headerFields: nil),
        data: nil,
        result: Result.success(true), // enum
        timeline: Timeline()
    )

    func response(completionHandler: @escaping (DataResponse<Any>) -> Void) -> Self {
        completionHandler(dataResponse)

        return self
    }

    func responseJSON(completionHandler: @escaping (DataResponse<Any>) -> Void) -> Self {
        return response(completionHandler: completionHandler)
    }
}

The Protocol Droids:

protocol NetworkManagerProtocol {
    var manager: SessionManagerProtocol { get set }
}

protocol SessionManagerProtocol {
    func request(_ url: URLConvertible, method: HTTPMethod, parameters: Parameters, encoding: ParameterEncoding, headers: HTTPHeaders?) -> DataRequestProtocol
}

protocol DataRequestProtocol {
    func responseJSON(completionHandler: @escaping (DataResponse<Any>) -> Void) -> Self
}

The test method: A lot of improvements could be made to make this more dynamic but again you get the idea

    var sut: UserService?

    override func setUp() {
        super.setUp()
        sut = UserService(NetworkManagerTest(SessionManagerMock()))
    }

    func testCreateUser201() {
        DataRequestMock.statusCode = 201

        let params : [String : String] = ["name": "foo baz", "email": "[email protected]", "password": "tester123"]
        var resultCode: Int!

        sut?.create(params) {(response: Response) in
            switch response {
            case .success(let resp):
                resultCode = resp.statusCode
            case .failure(let resp):
                resultCode = resp.statusCode
            }
        }

        XCTAssertEqual(resultCode, 201, "Status code is wrong")
    }
Inrush answered 15/11, 2019 at 5:5 Comment(0)

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.