I'm having trouble with an XSL translation in Chrome. I was wondering if there any tools that would allow me to step through the style sheet to see where the problem is.
- Use node tests to check the results of XPath queries.
- Use the document function to test file paths
- Use the JavaScript console to run XPath queries on the XML data source
- Use inline templates instead of
xsl:include
to eliminate path issues - Use comments to eliminate
xsl:include
statements referencing buggy templates - Use processing-instructions to comment blocks of code that have XML comments
- Use an embedded stylesheet to workaround same-origin policy restrictions
- Use
input
tags to printxsl:variable
values. - Use attribute value templates to print unknown values
- Use simplified stylesheets and parameterized XPath to modularize templates
- Use Opera as a cross-reference, since it shows line numbers in its XSLT error messages.
On linux there is a tool called xsltproc which takes an XSL and XML and outputs the transform.
It also shows context around errors.
I've found this most useful when I'm developing as I can test the result of my changes without the need to have a development server up and running. It just works.
However, I've noticed that the results of the transform can differ from that of Chrome for example. I don't know why this is, whether my transform was non-conforming, if Chrome is non-conforming, or if xsltproc is non-conforming.
EDIT My comment about differences between Chrome and xsltproc rendering the transform slightly differently is likely invalid.
- I had modified the XML schema somewhat, and since then, xsltproc was generating tags (based on type name of types in the schema) correctly, but Chrome was not.
- I was doing hard reloads to avoid Chrome reusing the cache.
- I could tell Chrome was using the new xsl as there was other changes included that were being rendered.
- Only the schema related tests were not working in Chrome for some reason.
- I've since found that now it is magically working, with no changes to the xsl, just on a different day.
So I guess some part of the xsl was being cached somehow (perhaps just the schema bit - totally guessing here)... hence why some debugging in Chrome would be super nice.
libxslt
processor, which is also used by zsltproc
- so any differences should be very minor, possibly due to different versions. --- In general, the XSLT specifications leave several things as "implementation dependent" - so a difference in behavior does not necessarily mean non-conformance. –
Lysander © 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.