Dynamically adding members to a dynamic object
Asked Answered
L

4

8

I'm looking for a way to add members dynamically to an dynamic object. OK, I guess a little clarification is needed...

When you do that :

dynamic foo = new ExpandoObject();
foo.Bar = 42;

The Bar property will be added dynamically at runtime. But the code still refers "statically" to Bar (the name "Bar" is hard-coded)... What if I want to add a property at runtime without knowing its name at compile time ?

I know how to do this with a custom dynamic object (I actually blogged about it a few months ago), using the methods of the DynamicObject class, but how can I do it with any dynamic object ?

I could probably use the IDynamicMetaObjectProvider interface, but I don't understand how to use it. For instance, what argument should I pass to the GetMetaObject method ? (it expects an Expression)

And by the way, how do you perform reflection on dynamic objects ? "Regular" reflection and TypeDescriptor don't show the dynamic members...

Any insight would be appreciated !

Loftus answered 17/1, 2010 at 3:34 Comment(3)
In C# 6.0, may be you can write it like foo.$Bar = 42; :) Not sure if it's allowed for dynamic...Roughcast
@nawfal, actually, that feature has been dropped... but anyway, foo.$Bar is just shorthand for foo["Bar"]Loftus
Thomas, didn't know about the feature being dropped (I'm glad about it), but oh yes, for a moment I overlooked the real requirement of your q.Roughcast
C
9

What you want is similar to Python's getattr/setattr functions. There's no built in equivalent way to do this in C# or VB.NET. The outer layer of the DLR (which ships w/ IronPython and IronRuby in Microsoft.Scripting.dll) includes a set of hosting APIs which includes an ObjectOperations API that has GetMember/SetMember methods. You could use those but you'd need the extra dependency of the DLR and a DLR based language.

Probably the simplest approach would be to create a CallSite w/ one of the existing C# binders. You can get the code for this by looking at the result of "foo.Bar = 42" in ildasm or reflector. But a simple example of this would be:

object x = new ExpandoObject();
CallSite<Func<CallSite, object, object, object>> site = CallSite<Func<CallSite, object, object, object>>.Create(
            Binder.SetMember(
                Microsoft.CSharp.RuntimeBinder.CSharpBinderFlags.None,
                "Foo",
                null,
                new[] { CSharpArgumentInfo.Create(CSharpArgumentInfoFlags.None, null) }
            )
        );
site.Target(site, x, 42);
Console.WriteLine(((dynamic)x).Foo);
Coptic answered 17/1, 2010 at 9:47 Comment(3)
I need to take some time to make sure I really understand what this code is doing, but anyway it's working fine... Thanks !Loftus
Would it be possible to do this < .Net 4.0 using the DLR? It appears that the use of dynamic would preclude this.Alienor
The method above should not work properly. Setter call site requires 2 argument infos to be provided instead of 1. The correct definition will be: new[] { CSharpArgumentInfo.Create(CSharpArgumentInfoFlags.None, null), CSharpArgumentInfo.Create(CSharpArgumentInfoFlags.None, null) }Breakout
P
5

The opensource framework Dynamitey will do this (available via nuget). It encapsulates while still caching the call site and binder code that @Dino-Viehland used.

Dynamic.InvokeSet(foo,"Bar",42);

It can also call many other kinds of c# binder too.

Posen answered 6/7, 2011 at 19:49 Comment(0)
M
5

ExpandoObject implements IDictionary<string,object> albeit explicitly. What this means is that you can simply cast the ExpandoObject to IDictionary<string,object> and manipulate the dictionary.

dynamic foo = new ExpandoObject();
foo.Bar = 42;
food = (IDictionary<string,object>)foo;
food["Baz"] = 54
Monobasic answered 12/8, 2011 at 22:24 Comment(1)
Thanks! Indeed ExpandoObject implements IDictionary, as I realized afterwards, so it is clearly the simplest solution in that case. However the scope of my question was wider: I was looking for a solution that would work with any dynamic object, not just ExpandoObjectLoftus
M
1

I know this is quite an old post, but I thought I'd pass along Miron Abramson solution on how you can create your own type and add properties at runtime -- in case anyone else out there is looking for something similar.

Matejka answered 28/3, 2012 at 22:38 Comment(0)

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.