Automatically delegating all methods of a java class
Asked Answered
C

9

38

Say I have a class with many of public methods:

public class MyClass {

    public void method1() {}
    public void method2() {}
    (...)
    public void methodN() {}

}

Now I would like to create a wrapper class which would delegate all the methods to wrapped instance (delegate):

public class WrapperClass extends MyClass  {
    private final MyClass delegate;

    public WrapperClass(MyClass delegate) {
        this.delagate = delegate;
    }

    public void method1() { delegate.method1(); }
    public void method2() { delegate.method2(); }
    (...)
    public void methodN() { delegate.methodN(); }

}

Now if MyClass has a lot of methods I would need to override each of them which is more or less the same code which just "delegates". I was wondering if it is possible to do some magic to automatically call a method in Java (so the Wrapper class would need to say "Hey if you call a method on me just go to delegate object and call this method on it).

BTW: I can not use inheritance because the delegate is not under my control.I just get its instance from elsewhere (another case would be if MyClass was final).

NOTE: I do not want IDE generation. I know I can do it with help of IntelliJ/Eclipse, but I'm curious if this can be done in code.

Any suggestions how to achieve something like this? (NOTE: I would probably be able to do it in some scripting languages like php where I could use php magic functions to intercept the call).

Carpometacarpus answered 20/5, 2015 at 8:50 Comment(5)
Certainly there is a (simple) solution with reflection, but do you want to accept the performance problems? The version with manual delegates is even simpler to read.Adolphus
I changed all back to MyClass. In my situation both class really inherit from MyBaseClass, but I wanted to make the example simpler so I changed it inherit from MyClass (I removed the edit with MyBaseClass, so you can for now forget about it:).Carpometacarpus
If you mean that I will have worse performance with reflection than this is acceptable. I would prefer not to use reflection (if possible) but it is still an acceptable option. If you have idea how to do this with reflection please post an answer. BTW: see my comment for an answer posted by @Nitin DandriyalCarpometacarpus
I could provide a solution with common interface, i.e. MyClass and WrapperClass implement the same interface and WrapperClass delegates to this interface. Ok for you?Adolphus
Yes.. This seems exactly what I'm looking for.Carpometacarpus
A
31

Perhaps the dynamic Proxy of java can help you. It only works if you consequently use interfaces. In this case, I will call the interface MyInterface and set up a default implementation:

public class MyClass implements MyInterface {

    @Override
    public void method1() {
        System.out.println("foo1");
    }

    @Override
    public void method2() {
        System.out.println("foo2");
    }

    @Override
    public void methodN() {
        System.out.println("fooN");
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        MyClass wrapped = new MyClass();
        wrapped.method1();
        wrapped.method2();
        MyInterface wrapper = WrapperClass.wrap(wrapped);
        wrapper.method1();
        wrapper.method2();
    }

}

The wrapper class implementation would look like:

public class WrapperClass extends MyClass implements MyInterface, InvocationHandler {

    private final MyClass delegate;

    public WrapperClass(MyClass delegate) {
        this.delegate = delegate;
    }

    public static MyInterface wrap(MyClass wrapped) {
        return (MyInterface) Proxy.newProxyInstance(MyClass.class.getClassLoader(), new Class[] { MyInterface.class }, new WrapperClass(wrapped));
    }

    //you may skip this definition, it is only for demonstration
    public void method1() {
        System.out.println("bar");
    }

    @Override
    public Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args) throws Throwable {
        Method m = findMethod(this.getClass(), method);
        if (m != null) {
            return m.invoke(this, args);
        }
        m = findMethod(delegate.getClass(), method);
        if (m != null) {
            return m.invoke(delegate, args);
        }
        return null;
    }

    private Method findMethod(Class<?> clazz, Method method) throws Throwable {
        try {
            return clazz.getDeclaredMethod(method.getName(), method.getParameterTypes());
        } catch (NoSuchMethodException e) {
            return null;
        }
    }

}

Note that this class:

  • extends MyClass, to inherit a default implementation (any other would do)
  • implements Invocationhandler, to allow the proxy to do reflection
  • optionally implement MyInterface (to satisfy the decorator pattern)

This solution allows you to override special methods, but to delegate all others. This will even work with sub classes of Wrapper class.

Note that the method findMethod does not yet capture the special cases.

Adolphus answered 20/5, 2015 at 9:51 Comment(8)
This is brilliant. To be honest in some situations I might want to talk to MyClass and not to its interface (because there might be situations where I want to override method from MyClass which is not part of the interface) but this is anyway exactly what I was wondering about in terms of Java capabilities. I think that proxying directly to object is probably not possible in standard java, but with this approach I would use some dynamic proxies generated by code generation libraries like cglib.Carpometacarpus
This looks amazing, but I'm confused about MyInterface. First you say, "It only works if you consequently use interfaces. In this case, I will call the interface MyInterface..." but then you say, "optionally implement MyInterface (to satisfy the decorator pattern)." Can you post the code for MyInterface? Does it need to have every method of MyClass? If so, that would kind of defeat the purpose of @Carpometacarpus not having to manually list every method.Steato
Optionally because it inherits from MyClass which already implements MyInterface. The code of MyInterface can be derived from MyClass (@Override methods must be part of the interface, else it would not compile). Please note that this answer was accepted half a year ago.Adolphus
I see when it was accepted and am not disputing the answer. Just trying to figure it out. So MyInterface is optional for WrapperClass but mandatory for MyClass, right? What, however, is in MyInterface? Does it contain every method of MyClass? It'd be great if you could show that in your example. Also, wrapped and wrapper are not the same class, no? I'm trying to make this work with a decorator pattern (I've got an object I'd like to wrap that has tons of methods, just like @walkeros), but I'm obviously missing something fundamental here. Thank you.Steato
I already mentioned that the interface must contain all methods that are annotated with @Override. And honestly, Walkeros wanted it this way, but I would discourage to use this solution (using proxys and reflection just to delegate is fairly weird). I certainly would have developed a better solution if I had insight in the true problem.Adolphus
Thanks! But I don't get it. If MyInterface must contain every method in MyClass, how is that any better than the original problem where every method is in WrapperClass? It's the same amount of work/maintenance with more overhead. The true problem AFAICT is that when you use the decorator pattern you have to 'delegate' every public method in the wrapped object (i.e. public void methodN() { delegate.methodN(); }), which can be a huge hassle. It'd be nice if the wrapper would just run any overridden methods and just delegate everything else. Perhaps I should post a new question...Steato
With Interface you only have to write the signature of the methods, not its implementation. And that only once not for any sub class. In my opinion there is nothing wrong with having one Wrapper base class with delegating methods that every other could inherit.Adolphus
In case anyone who gets here is curious, markbramnik.blogspot.com/2010/04/cglib-introduction.html is what I'm looking for. I haven't tried it yet, but apparently with CGLIB you can wrap an object and send along all the methods without having to maintain an interface.Steato
S
11

This question is 6 months old already and @CoronA's wonderful answer has satisfied and been accepted by @walkeros, but I thought I would add something here as I think this can be pushed an extra step.

As discussed with @CoronA in the comments to his answer, instead of having to create and maintain a long list of MyClass methods in WrapperClass (i.e. public void methodN() { delegate.methodN(); }), the dynamic proxy solution moves this to the interface. The issue is that you still have to create and maintain a long list of signatures for the MyClass methods in the interface, which is perhaps a bit simpler but doesn't completely solve the problem. This is especially the case if you don't have access to MyClass in order to know all the methods.

According to Three approaches for decorating your code,

For longer classes, a programmer must choose the lesser of two evils: implement many wrapper methods and keep the type of decorated object or maintain a simple decorator implementation and sacrifice retaining the decorated object type.

So perhaps this is an expected limitation of the Decorator Pattern.

@Mark-Bramnik, however, gives an fascinating solution using CGLIB at Interposing on Java Class Methods (without interfaces). I was able to combine this with @CoronaA's solution in order to create a wrapper that can override individual methods but then pass everything else to the wrapped object without requiring an interface.

Here is MyClass.

public class MyClass {

    public void method1() { System.out.println("This is method 1 - " + this); } 
    public void method2() { System.out.println("This is method 2 - " + this); } 
    public void method3() { System.out.println("This is method 3 - " + this); } 
    public void methodN() { System.out.println("This is method N - " + this); }

}

Here is WrapperClass which only overrides method2(). As you'll see below, the non-overridden methods are, in fact, not passed to the delegate, which can be a problem.

public class WrapperClass extends MyClass {

    private MyClass delagate;

    public WrapperClass(MyClass delegate) { this.delagate = delegate; }

    @Override
    public void method2() {
        System.out.println("This is overridden method 2 - " + delagate);
    }

}

Here is MyInterceptor which extends MyClass. It employs the proxy solution using CGLIB as described by @Mark-Bramnik. It also employs @CononA's method of determining whether or not to send the method to the wrapper (if it is overridden) or the wrapped object (if it is not).

import java.lang.reflect.Method;

import net.sf.cglib.proxy.MethodInterceptor;
import net.sf.cglib.proxy.MethodProxy;

public class MyInterceptor extends MyClass implements MethodInterceptor {

    private Object realObj;

    public MyInterceptor(Object obj) { this.realObj = obj; }

    @Override
    public void method2() {
        System.out.println("This is overridden method 2 - " + realObj);
    }

    @Override
    public Object intercept(Object arg0, Method method, Object[] objects,
            MethodProxy methodProxy) throws Throwable {
        Method m = findMethod(this.getClass(), method);
        if (m != null) { return m.invoke(this, objects); }
        Object res = method.invoke(realObj, objects);
        return res;
    }

    private Method findMethod(Class<?> clazz, Method method) throws Throwable {
        try {
            return clazz.getDeclaredMethod(method.getName(), method.getParameterTypes());
        } catch (NoSuchMethodException e) {
            return null;
        }
    }

}

Here is Main and the results you get if you run it.

import net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer;

public class Main {

    private static MyClass unwrapped;
    private static WrapperClass wrapped;
    private static MyClass proxified;

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        unwrapped = new MyClass();
        System.out.println(">>> Methods from the unwrapped object:");
        unwrapped.method1();
        unwrapped.method2();
        unwrapped.method3();
        wrapped = new WrapperClass(unwrapped);
        System.out.println(">>> Methods from the wrapped object:");
        wrapped.method1();
        wrapped.method2();
        wrapped.method3();
        proxified = createProxy(unwrapped);
        System.out.println(">>> Methods from the proxy object:");
        proxified.method1();
        proxified.method2();
        proxified.method3();
    }

    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    public static <T> T createProxy(T obj) {
        Enhancer e = new Enhancer();
        e.setSuperclass(obj.getClass());
        e.setCallback(new MyInterceptor(obj));
        T proxifiedObj = (T) e.create();
        return proxifiedObj;
    }

}

>>> Methods from the unwrapped object:
This is method 1 - MyClass@e26db62
This is method 2 - MyClass@e26db62
This is method 3 - MyClass@e26db62

>>> Methods from the wrapped object:
This is method 1 - WrapperClass@7b7035c6
This is overridden method 2 - MyClass@e26db62
This is method 3 - WrapperClass@7b7035c6

>>> Methods from the proxy object:
This is method 1 - MyClass@e26db62
This is overridden method 2 - MyClass@e26db62
This is method 3 - MyClass@e26db62

As you can see, when you run the methods on wrapped you get the wrapper for the methods that are not overridden (i.e. method1() and method3()). When you run the methods on proxified, however, all of the methods are run on the wrapped object without the pain of having to delegate them all in WrapperClass or put all of the method signatures in an interface. Thanks to @CoronA and @Mark-Bramnik for what seems like a pretty cool solution to this problem.

Steato answered 4/11, 2015 at 1:17 Comment(4)
I'll +1 this answer. I knew that this can be done with bytecode generation libraries like cglib. However when asking that question I really was wondering if java itself allows this. Using code generators is of course an option and have many advantages (like the class does not have to be final). However you still need to deliver cglib libraries together with your application. Also code generation adds extra overhead (not that big, but still). Cheers.Carpometacarpus
I've done a lot of research into this and haven't found another solution in Java. (Ruby, for example, has a SimpleDelegator class.) I'm not an expert in Java, but I feel relatively confident that this is the only way. Delivering the CGLIB libraries shouldn't be too much of a problem, no? And if performance is important, the Decorator Pattern is probably not the way to go. For run, I removed the System.out.println from methodN() (so it does nothing) and ran it 1 million times. Perhaps not a fair test, but unwrapped it took 0 ms and wrapped it took 2417 ms.Steato
I decided to run methodN() 1 million times on unwrapped, wrapped and proxified. Still not sure if this is a fair test, but the results, respectively were 0 milliseconds, 4 ms and 1485 ms. It would appear that the bytecode generation library might have some significant overhead. But it works!Steato
Yeah I guess so. Byte generation is done on runtime, so it must by slower than normal methods calls. Anyway your test is usefull and shows the disadvantage of cglib. Anyway as you said I did not find better solution to such case either.Carpometacarpus
M
9

Check the @Delegate annotation from Lombok framework: https://projectlombok.org/features/experimental/Delegate

Mender answered 16/3, 2017 at 17:8 Comment(1)
This would be my answer if you cannot use Groovy, however, you have to be careful because @Delegate was demoted to an Experimental feature in v1.14. projectlombok.org/features/experimental/all stackoverflow.com/a/12807937/378151Vision
V
6

Switch to Groovy :-)

@CompileStatic
public class WrapperClass extends MyClass  {
    @Delegate private final MyClass delegate;

    public WrapperClass(MyClass delegate) {
        this.delagate = delegate;
    }

    //Done. That's it.

}

http://mrhaki.blogspot.com/2009/08/groovy-goodness-delegate-to-simplify.html

Vision answered 11/11, 2015 at 0:7 Comment(4)
I think I already stated that I know that it can be done in scripting langauges and the question was about javaCarpometacarpus
Meh. I'll take the -1. If it's compile at build time into a .class file, is it really a scripting language at that point? Throw a @CompileStatic on there if it makes you feel better. Do you consider Scala a scripting language? May point being that Java makes this lame. You're running a JVM, take advantage of it.Vision
You got -1 not for I'm considering Grovy a scripting language, but because the question was about java.Carpometacarpus
If having Groovy in your source really bugs you, create a separate project, import the class you need to delegate (as seen above), then package your tiny project up as a jar and import your WrapperClass it into your project as needed.Vision
D
2

You don't have to do this -- your Wrapper class is a subclass of the original class, so it inherits all of its publicly accessible methods -- and if you don't implement them, the original method will be called.

You shouldn't have extends Myclass together with a private MyClass object -- that's really really redundant, and I can't think of a design pattern where doing that is right. Your WrapperClass is a MyClass, and hence you can just use its own fields and methods instead of calling delegate.

EDIT: In the case of MyClass being final, you'd be circumventing the willfull declaration to not allow subclassing by "faking" inheritance; I can't think of anyone willing to do that other than you, who is in control of WrapperClass; but, since you're in control of WrapperClass, not wrapping everything you don't need is really more than an option -- it's the right thing to do, because your object is not a MyClass, and should only behave like one in the cases you mentally considered.

EDIT you've just changed your question to mean something completely different by removing the MyClass superclass to your WrapperClass; that's a bit bad, because it invalidates all answers given so far. You should have opened another question.

Date answered 20/5, 2015 at 8:54 Comment(5)
Maybe you are not getting it, but delegate object comes from "somewhere else" and has some internal state. I don't only want to inherit the "definition" because this indeed can be done with inheritance. I want to delegate so that I can reuse (and maybe modify) its internal state.Carpometacarpus
The matching design pattern is the decorator pattern. I would use a common super interface instead of a common super class but there are cases that this is not possible.Adolphus
@Marcus: I removed the edit which you mentioned because it does not change anything (you can remove your edit)Carpometacarpus
@CoronA: Indeed I have a common super interface in my situation, but I remove it just to make the example simpler... but still I get the "delegate" object from "outside" so I can not "inherit" directly from it. I want to keep its stateCarpometacarpus
@Marcus "I can't think of anyone willing to do that other than you": as you probably saw normally I would have MyClass extends MyBaseClass and MyWrapperClass extends MyBaseClass (I did not want to compilcate the example so I removed this edit). In such case "final" would be a problem.Carpometacarpus
P
1

Credits go to CoronA for Pointing out the Proxy and InvocationHandler classes. I worked out a more reusable utility class based on his solution, using generics:

public class DelegationUtils {

    public static <I> I wrap(Class<I> iface, I wrapped) {
        return wrapInternally(iface, wrapped, new SimpleDecorator(wrapped));
    }

    private static <I> I wrapInternally (Class<I> iface, I wrapped, InvocationHandler handler) {
        return (I) Proxy.newProxyInstance(wrapped.getClass().getClassLoader(), new Class[] { iface }, handler);
    }

    private static class SimpleDecorator<T> implements InvocationHandler {

        private final T delegate;

        private SimpleDecorator(T delegate) {
            this.delegate = delegate;
        }

        @Override
        public Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args) throws Throwable {
            Method m = findMethod(delegate.getClass(), method);
            if (m == null) {
                throw new NullPointerException("Found no method " + method + " in delegate: " + delegate);
            }
            return m.invoke(delegate, args);
        }
    }    

    private static Method findMethod(Class<?> clazz, Method method) throws Throwable {
        try {
            return clazz.getDeclaredMethod(method.getName(), method.getParameterTypes());
        } catch (NoSuchMethodException e) {
            return null;
        }
    }
}

Test it:

public class Test {

    public  interface Test {
        public void sayHello ();
    }

    public static class TestImpl implements Test {
        @Override
        public void sayHello() {
            System.out.println("HELLO!");
        }
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        Test proxy = DelegationUtils.wrap(Test.class, new TestImpl());
        proxy.sayHello();
    }
}

I wanted to create an automatic delegation class that executes the delegatee's methods on the EDT. With this class, you just create a new utility method that will use an EDTDecorator, in which the implementation will wrap m.invoke in a SwingUtilities.invokeLater.

However, if I reflect on this, I may want to reconsider making a non-Reflection based proxy per interface that I have - it might be cleaner and faster, and more understandable. But, it's possible.

Panacea answered 13/2, 2016 at 15:29 Comment(0)
V
0

Define a method in WrapperClass i.e. delegate() that returns the instance of MyClass

OR

You can use reflection to do that but the caller has to pass the method name as an argument to an exposed method. And there will be complications regarding the method arguments/overloaded methods etc.

BTW: I can not use inheritance because the delegate is not under my control.I just get its instance from elsewhere (another case would be if MyClass was final)

The code that you have posted has public class WrapperClass extends MyClass

Actually your current implementation of WrapperClass is actually a decorator on top of MyClass

Veronicaveronika answered 20/5, 2015 at 9:5 Comment(3)
Ok.. that's and idea. but I don't want the caller to bother with reflection. Caller needs to talk to instance of MyClass and not to use reflection method like java.lang.reflect.Method#invoke if this is what you meant?Carpometacarpus
Yes, I meant Method#invoke in second solutionVeronicaveronika
Ok.. so this is not an option, because caller needs to talk to instance of MyClass, but thanks for idea.Carpometacarpus
D
0

Let me redefine the problem for a specific case. I want to override the close method of ResultSet interface in jdbc. My aim is to close the preparedstatement in close method of result set. I could not access to the Class (DelegatingResultSet) that implements in ResultSet interface. There are a lot of methods in ResultSet interface and overriding them one by one and calling the corresponding method from the ResultSet object is one solution. For a dynamic solution I used Dynamic ProxyClasses (https://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/guide/reflection/proxy.html).

    // New ResultSet implementation
    public class MyResultSet implements InvocationHandler {
        ResultSet rs;
        PreparedStatement ps;
        private Method closeMethod;

        public MyResultSet(ResultSet rs, PreparedStatement ps) {
            super();
            this.rs = rs;
            this.ps = ps;
            try {
                closeMethod = ResultSet.class.getMethod("close",null);
            } catch (NoSuchMethodException | SecurityException e) {
                e.printStackTrace();
            }
        }

        public void close() {
            try {
                rs.close();
                ps.close();
            } catch (SQLException e) {
                e.printStackTrace();
            }

        }

        public static Object newInstance(ResultSet rs, PreparedStatement ps) {
            return java.lang.reflect.Proxy.newProxyInstance(rs.getClass().getClassLoader(), rs.getClass().getInterfaces(),
                    new MyResultSet(rs,ps));
        }

        public Object invoke(Object proxy, Method m, Object[] args) 
throws Throwable {
            Object result = null;
            try {
                Class declaringClass = m.getDeclaringClass();

                if (m.getName().compareTo("close")==0) {
                        close();
                } else {
                    result = m.invoke(rs, args);
                }
            } catch (InvocationTargetException e) {
                throw e.getTargetException();
            } catch (Exception e) {
                throw new RuntimeException(e.getMessage());

            } finally {
            }
            return result;
        }
    }

// How to call it:

ResultSet prs = (ResultSet) MyResultSet.newInstance(rs,ps);
Detour answered 13/11, 2018 at 12:10 Comment(0)
U
0

I really appreciated @CoronA's answer. I also looked at @Mark Cramer's answer, but, if I'm not missing something, I think that there are always at least two instances of the "proxified" class with a strange relationship beteen the two objects.

This, along with the fact that cglib is now deprecated, pushed me to find a new implementation based on ByteBuddy.

This is what I came up with:

public class MyClass {

    public String testMethod() {
         return "11111";
    }

    public String testMethod2() {
        return "aaaaa";
    }

}

public class MyClassWithDelegate extends MyClass {

    private static final Constructor<? extends MyClassWithDelegate> CONSTRUCTOR_WITH_DELEGATE;

    static {
        Constructor<? extends MyClassWithDelegate> temp = null;
        try {
            final var instrumentedMyClassWithDelegateType =
                new ByteBuddy()
                    .subclass(MyClassWithDelegate.class)
                    .method(ElementMatchers.any())
                    .intercept(MethodDelegation.to(MethodInterceptor.class))
                    .make()
                    .load(MyClassWithDelegate.class.getClassLoader())
                    .getLoaded();
            temp = instrumentedMyClassWithDelegateType.getConstructor(MyClass.class);
        } catch (final Exception e) {
            LOGGER.error("Cannot instrument class {}", MyClassWithDelegate.class, e);
        }
        CONSTRUCTOR_WITH_DELEGATE = temp;
    }

    public static MyClassWithDelegate getInstanceWithDelegate(final MyClass myClass) {
       try {
            return CONSTRUCTOR_WITH_DELEGATE.newInstance(myClass);
        } catch (final Exception e) {
            LOGGER.error("Cannot get instance of {}", MyClassWithDelegate.class, e);
            throw new IllegalStateException();
        }
    }

    private final boolean initialized;
    private final MyClass delegate;

    public MyClassWithDelegate(final MyClass delegate) {
        super();
        this.delegate = delegate;
        this.initialized = true;
    }

    public String testMethod() {
         return "22222";
    }

    public static class MethodInterceptor {
        @RuntimeType
        public static Object intercept(@This final MyClassWithDelegate self,
                                       @Origin final Method method,
                                       @AllArguments final Object[] args,
                                       @SuperMethod final Method superMethod) throws Throwable {
            if (!self.initialized || method.getDeclaringClass().equals(MyClassWithDelegate.class)) {
                return superMethod.invoke(self, args);
            } else {
                return method.invoke(self.delegate, args);
            }
        }
    }
}

The initialized field is used to prevent method calls the super constructor from being redirected to the delegate before its assignment (in this case it wouldn't be a problem, but I wanted to create a generic solution).

Every method called on an instance of MyClassWithDelegate will be redirected to the delegate, except from methods declared inside MyClassWithDelegate itself.

In this example, calling testMethod() on an instance of MyClassWithDelegate will return "22222", while testMethod2() will return "aaaaa".

Obviously, the delegation will actually work only if every instance of MyClassWithDelegate is obtained calling the getInstanceWithDelegate factory method.

Unboned answered 28/4, 2022 at 11:21 Comment(0)

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.