Google Chrome forcing download of "f.txt" file
Asked Answered
C

7

39

After updating to Chrome 40.0.2214.111, variably when I visit certain Google related sites (like http://youtube.com and get presented with an ad before the video), the browser downloads a file named f.txt.

I do not have any adblock plugins installed.

f.txt contains a few lines of JavaScript...starting with:

if (!window.mraid) {document.write('\x3cdiv class="GoogleActiveViewClass" ' +'id="DfaVisibilityIdentifier_3851468350"\x3e');}document.write('\x3ca target\x3d\x22_blank\x22 href\x3d\x22https://adclick.g.doubleclick.net/pcs/click?xai\x3dAKAOjsvDhmmoi2r124JkMyiBGALWfUlTX-zFA1gEdFeZDgdS3JKiEDPl3iIYGtj9Tv2yTJtASqD6S-yqbuNQH5u6fXm4rThyCZ0plv9SXM-UPKJgH4KSS08c97Eim4i45ewgN9OoG3E_ 

In looking up the issue on Google, others have experienced the same, but I have not found any resolution or understanding of why this is happening. I assume it is a content-disposition related bug with some of the JS files loaded on the page, and will clear up in a future patch.

Wondering if anybody else had experienced / insight.

Cartwell answered 16/2, 2015 at 6:21 Comment(0)
U
38

This issue appears to be causing ongoing consternation, so I will attempt to give a clearer answer than the previously posted answers, which only contain partial hints as to what's happening.

  • Some time around the summer of 2014, IT Security Engineer Michele Spagnuolo (apparently employed at Google Zurich) developed a proof-of-concept exploit and supporting tool called Rosetta Flash that demonstrated a way for hackers to run malicious Flash SWF files from a remote domain in a manner which tricks browsers into thinking it came from the same domain the user was currently browsing. This allows bypassing of the "same-origin policy" and can permit hackers a variety of exploits. You can read the details here: https://miki.it/blog/2014/7/8/abusing-jsonp-with-rosetta-flash/
    • Known affected browsers: Chrome, IE
    • Possibly unaffected browsers: Firefox
  • Adobe has released at least 5 different fixes over the past year while trying to comprehensively fix this vulnerability, but various major websites also introduced their own fixes earlier on in order to prevent mass vulnerability to their userbases. Among the sites to do so: Google, Youtube, Facebook, Github, and others. One component of the ad-hoc mitigation implemented by these website owners was to force the HTTP Header Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=f.txt on the returns from JSONP endpoints. This has the annoyance of causing the browser to automatically download a file called f.txt that you didn't request—but it is far better than your browser automatically running a possibly malicious Flash file.
  • In conclusion, the websites you were visiting when this file spontaneously downloaded are not bad or malicious, but some domain serving content on their pages (usually ads) had content with this exploit inside it. Note that this issue will be random and intermittent in nature because even visiting the same pages consecutively will often produce different ad content. For example, the advertisement domain ad.doubleclick.net probably serves out hundreds of thousands of different ads and only a small percentage likely contain malicious content. This is why various users online are confused thinking they fixed the issue or somehow affected it by uninstalling this program or running that scan, when in fact it is all unrelated. The f.txt download just means you were protected from a recent potential attack with this exploit and you should have no reason to believe you were compromised in any way.
  • The only way I'm aware that you could stop this f.txt file from being downloaded again in the future would be to block the most common domains that appear to be serving this exploit. I've put a short list below of some of the ones implicated in various posts. If you wanted to block these domains from touching your computer, you could add them to your firewall or alternatively you could use the HOSTS file technique described in the second section of this link: http://www.chromefans.org/chrome-tutorial/how-to-block-a-website-in-google-chrome.htm
  • Short list of domains you could block (by no means a comprehensive list). Most of these are highly associated with adware and malware:
    • ad.doubleclick.net
    • adclick.g.doubleclick.net
    • secure-us.imrworldwide.com
    • d.turn.com
    • ad.turn.com
    • secure.insightexpressai.com
    • core.insightexpressai.com
Ulane answered 23/9, 2015 at 11:16 Comment(0)
G
4

I experienced the same issue, same version of Chrome though it's unrelated to the issue. With the developer console I captured an instance of the request that spawned this, and it is an API call served by ad.doubleclick.net. Specifically, this resource returns a response with Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="f.txt".

The URL I happened to capture was https://ad.doubleclick.net/adj/N7412.226578.VEVO/B8463950.115078190;sz=300x60...

Per curl:

$ curl -I 'https://ad.doubleclick.net/adj/N7412.226578.VEVO/B8463950.115078190;sz=300x60;click=https://2975c.v.fwmrm.net/ad/l/1?s=b035&n=10613%3B40185%3B375600%3B383270&t=1424475157058697012&f=&r=40185&adid=9201685&reid=3674011&arid=0&auid=&cn=defaultClick&et=c&_cc=&tpos=&sr=0&cr=;ord=435266097?'
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
P3P: policyref="https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/gcn_p3p_.xml", CP="CURa ADMa DEVa TAIo PSAo PSDo OUR IND UNI PUR INT DEM STA PRE COM NAV OTC NOI DSP COR"
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 23:35:38 GMT
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: Fri, 01 Jan 1990 00:00:00 GMT
Cache-Control: no-cache, must-revalidate
Content-Type: text/javascript; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="f.txt"
Server: cafe
X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block
Set-Cookie: test_cookie=CheckForPermission; expires=Fri, 20-Feb-2015 23:50:38 GMT; path=/; domain=.doubleclick.net
Alternate-Protocol: 443:quic,p=0.08
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Accept-Ranges: none
Vary: Accept-Encoding
Gunner answered 20/2, 2015 at 23:38 Comment(0)
T
2

FYI, after reading this thread, I took a look at my installed programs and found that somehow, shortly after upgrading to Windows 10 (possibly/probably? unrelated), an ASK search app was installed as well as a Chrome extension (Windows was kind enough to remind to check that). Since removing, I have not have the f.txt issue.

Trigeminal answered 20/9, 2015 at 3:36 Comment(1)
I removed some programs and updated chrome after reading your reply. One or the other seemed to fix the problem in my case.Holston
A
0

This can occur on android too not just computers. Was browsing using Kiwi when the site I was on began to endlessly redirect so I cut net access to close it out and noticed my phone had DL'd something f.txt in my downloaded files.

Deleted it and didn't open.

Athapaskan answered 26/12, 2019 at 2:31 Comment(0)
P
0

For me, the problem was like this. I was using the Ad Inserter plugin, updated the plugin and all is fine.

Pintail answered 3/5, 2023 at 6:23 Comment(0)
C
0

Try to run next code in inspect element console in chrome on "Downloads" page:

setInterval(() => {
  const b = document.querySelector("downloads-manager").shadowRoot.querySelector("div#mainContainer iron-list#downloadsList").querySelector("downloads-item#frb0").shadowRoot.querySelector("cr-button#pauseOrResume");
  // console.log(b.innerText);

  if (b.innerText.includes("Resume")) {
    b.click();
  }
}, 1000);
Cupped answered 21/4 at 19:46 Comment(0)
S
-1

Seems related to https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/google-caja-discuss/ite6K5c8mqs/Ayqw72XJ9G8J.

The so-called "Rosetta Flash" vulnerability is that allowing arbitrary yet identifier-like text at the beginning of a JSONP response is sufficient for it to be interpreted as a Flash file executing in that origin. See for more information: http://miki.it/blog/2014/7/8/abusing-jsonp-with-rosetta-flash/

JSONP responses from the proxy servlet now: * are prefixed with "/**/", which still allows them to execute as JSONP but removes requester control over the first bytes of the response. * have the response header Content-Disposition: attachment.

Squinty answered 25/6, 2015 at 8:5 Comment(1)
what? This is a copy-paste from the link you cited, please add explanation of how this answers the question. You also lost essential formatting - two of those asterisks are supposed to be 'bullets' on items in a list.Fleck

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.