can't use template ref on component in vue 3 composition api

Question

I want to get the dimensions of a vue.js component from the parent (I'm working with the experimental script setup).

When I use the ref inside a component, it works as expected. I get the dimensions:

// Child.vue
<template>
  <div ref="wrapper">
   // content ...
  </div>
</template>
<script setup>
import { ref, onMounted } from 'vue'

const wrapper = ref(null)

onMounted(() => {
  const rect = wrapper.value.getBoundingClientRect()
  console.log(rect) // works fine!
})
</script>

But I want to get the dimension inside the parent component. Is this possible?

I have tried this:

// Parent.vue
<template>
  <Child ref="wrapper" />
</template>
<script setup>
import Child from './Child'
import { ref, onMounted } from 'vue'

const wrapper = ref(null)

onMounted(() => {
  const rect = wrapper.value.getBoundingClientRect()
  console.log(rect) // failed!
})
</script>

the console logs this error message: Uncaught (in promise) TypeError: x.value.getBoundingClientRect is not a function

---

In the documentation I can only find the way to use template refs inside the child component

does this approach not work because the refs are "closed by default" as the rfcs description says?

Desultory

Answer 1

I ran into this issue today. The problem is that, when using the <script setup> pattern, none of the declared variables are returned. When you get a ref to the component, it's just an empty object. The way to get around this is by using defineExpose in the setup block.

// Child.vue

<template>
  <div ref="wrapper">
   <!-- content ... -->
  </div>
</template>

<script setup>
import { defineExpose, ref } from 'vue'

const wrapper = ref(null)

defineExpose({ wrapper })
</script>

The way you set up the template ref in the parent is fine. The fact that you were seeing empty object { } in the console means that it was working.

Like the other answer already said, the child ref can be accessed from the parent like this: wrapper.value.wrapper.getBoundingClientRect().

The rfc has a section talking about how/why this works: https://github.com/vuejs/rfcs/blob/master/active-rfcs/0040-script-setup.md#exposing-components-public-interface

It's also important to note that, with the <script setup> pattern, your ref in the parent component will not be a ComponentInstance. This means that you can't call $el on it like you might otherwise. It will only contain the values you put in your defineExpose.

Jargonize

Note: you don't need to import defineExpose (otherwise, great answer! +1) – Forethought

Answer 2

I don't this this is necessarily related to the <script setup> tag. Even in the standard script syntax your second example will not work as-is.

The issue is you are putting ref directly on the Child component:

<template>
  <Child ref="wrapper" />
</template>

and a ref to a component is NOT the same as a ref to the root element of that component. It does not have a getBoundingClientRect() method.

In fact, Vue 3 no longer requires a component to have a single root element. You can define your Child component as :

<template>
  <div ref="wrapper1">// content ...</div>
  <div ref="wrapper2">// content ...</div>
</template>
<script >
import { ref } from "vue";

export default {
  name: "Child",

  setup() {
    const wrapper1 = ref(null);
    const wrapper2 = ref(null);
 
    return { wrapper1, wrapper2 };
  },
};
</script>

What should be the ref in your Parent component now?

Log the wrapper.value to your console from your Parent component. It is actually an object of all the refs in your Child component:

{
  wrapper1: {...}, // the 1st HTMLDivElement
  wrapper2: {...}  // the 2nd HTMLDivElement
}

You can do wrapper.value.wrapper1.getBoundingClientRect(), that will work fine.

Euromarket

duplicating error in setup(){} wrapper1 wrapper -> 2 <- – Eyre

Answer 3

You could get access to the root element using $el field like below:

<template>
  <Child ref="wrapper" />
</template>

<script setup>
import Child from './Child'
import { ref, onMounted } from 'vue'

const wrapper = ref(null)

onMounted(() => {
  const rect = wrapper.value.$el.getBoundingClientRect()
  console.log(rect) 
})
</script

Diphenylhydantoin

got an other error: Uncaught TypeError: wrapper.value.$el is undefined – Desultory

please do console.log(wrapper.value) and give me the output – Diphenylhydantoin

here is the output: imgur.com/a/hrwry2Z inside the script its 'null', inside the onMounted its an empty object { } – Desultory

In my case I get object with $el,$data $options fields – Diphenylhydantoin

Where is the setup method? – Whorl

<script setup> is a new sugar syntax that replaces setup hook and any property is exposed without using return{} – Diphenylhydantoin

Answer 4

If you're seeing the wrapper.value as null then make sure the element you're trying to get the ref to isn't hidden under a false v-if. Vue will not instantiate the ref until the element is actually required.

I realize this answer is not for the current question, but it is a top result for "template ref null vue 3 composition api" so I suspect more like me will come here and will appreciate this diagnosis.

Taneshatang

you are my hero, this was exactly the problem I have, the refs I have are actually under a v-if ! and all the others are NOT going in the direction here. – Methyl

Answer 5

Right, so here's what you need to do:

// Parent component
<template>
  <Child :get-ref="(el) => { wrapper = el }" />
</template>

<script setup>
import Child from './Child.vue';
import { ref, onMounted } from 'vue';

const wrapper = ref();

onMounted(() => {
  const rect = wrapper.value.getBoundingClientRect()
  console.log(rect) // works fine!
});
</script>

and

// Child component
<template>
  <div :ref="(el) => { wrapper = el; getRef(el)}">
   // content ...
  </div>
</template>

<script setup>
import { defineProps, ref, onMounted } from 'vue';
  
const props = defineProps({
  getRef: {
    type: Function,
  },
});

const wrapper = ref();

onMounted(() => {
  const rect = wrapper.value.getBoundingClientRect()
  console.log(rect) // works fine!
});
</script>

To learn why, we need to check Vue's documentation on ref: Vue special-attribute 'ref'.

On dynamic binding of (template) ref, it says:

<!-- When bound dynamically, we can define ref as a callback function,
passing the element or component instance explicitly -->
<child-component :ref="(el) => child = el"></child-component>

Since the prop lets you pass data from the parent to a child, we can use the combination of the prop and dynamic ref binding to get the wanted results. First, we pass the dynamic ref callback function into the child as the getRef prop:

<Child :get-ref="(el) => { wrapper = el }" />

Then, the child does the dynamic ref binding on the element, where it assigns the target el to its wrapper ref and calls the getRef prop function in that callback function to let the parent grab the el as well:

<div :ref="(el) => {
            wrapper = el; // child registers wrapper ref
            getRef(el); // parent registers the wrapper ref
            }">

Note that this allows us to have the ref of the wrapper element in both the parent AND the child component. If you wished to have access to the wrapper element only in the parent component, you could skip the child's callback function, and just bind the ref to a prop like this:

// Child component
<template>
  <div :ref="getRef">
   // content ...
  </div>
</template>

<script setup>
import { defineProps } from 'vue';

const props = defineProps({
  getRef: {
    type: Function,
  },
});
</script>

That would let only the parent have the ref to your template's wrapper.

Autoplasty

Answer 6

Slightly more compact:

<script setup>
const elementRef = ref(null)

const getElementRect = () => {
  return elementRef.value.getBoundingClientRect()
}

defineExpose({
  getElementRect
})

</script>
<template>
    <div ref="elementRef">
        <!-- content ... -->
    </div>
</template>

Interlingua