With the advent of Microsoft's Fluent Design System and the propagation of the new Acrylic Material around the Windows ecosystem, I thought it would be great to use it in some Web layouts.
Acoording to the spec, the composition of an acrylic layer is:
So I went to try a CSS-only approach inspired by the layers in that picture, this way:
body {
margin: 0;
font: 1em/1.4 Sans-serif;
background: url("https://cdn.pixabay.com/photo/2017/03/27/16/50/beach-2179624_1280.jpg") center center;
background-size: 100vw auto;
}
main {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
height: 100vh;
}
.acrylic {
padding: 4em 6em;
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
}
.acrylic::before {
background: url("https://cdn.pixabay.com/photo/2017/03/27/16/50/beach-2179624_1280.jpg") center center;
background-size: 100vw auto;
filter: blur(10px);
content: "";
position: absolute;
left: -10px;
top: -10px;
width: calc(100% + 20px);
height: calc(100% + 20px);
z-index: -1;
}
.acrylic::after {
content: "";
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
z-index: -1;
opacity: 0.65;
border: 1px solid #fff;
background: #fff;
background-image: url();
}
.shadow {
border-radius: 1px;
box-shadow: 0 10px 30px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1), 0 1px 8px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2);
}
<main>
<div class="acrylic shadow">
Acrylic material!
</div>
</main>
The result is really close to the spec and is also responsive, but has a big problem: just stack another .acrylic
div and the background trick doesn't work anymore.
The question is: is there some smarter way to gaussian blur without duplicating the body background for each children? Or maybe some smarter way to dinamically calculate its position?
2022 Update
When I originally posted this question, the backdrop-filter
CSS feature was an experimental thing not enabled even in Chrome, so I was asking for an alternative solution, if possible, at the time.
Time passes... Finally it's enabled by default on all browsers over 0.5% users. So it's really simplier to solve nowadays than it was before.