VARCHAR vs TEXT in MySQL

Question

I have two fields: one to store an excerpt with a max size of 500 characters, and another to store a description with a max size of 10,000 characters.

What data types should I use, TEXT or VARCHAR? And why?

After MySQL 5.0.3 VARCHAR accepts ~65000 characters. But this does not tell why I should use one type and or the other.

I'm reasoning that I should use VARCHAR for the excerpt because I can assign a size limit, and TEXT for the description field as it's larger.

Monserratemonsieur

Possible duplicate of MySQL: Large VARCHAR vs. TEXT? – Eggleston

Answer 1

A long VARCHAR is stored in the same manner as a TEXT/BLOB field in InnoDB (which I assume you're using for transactionality, referential integrity and crash recovery, right?) - that is, externally to the rest of the table on disk (which may require another disk read to retrieve).

From storage prospective BLOB, TEXT as well as long VARCHAR are handled same way by Innodb. This is why Innodb manual calls it “long columns” rather than BLOBs.

source

Unless you need to index these columns (in which case VARCHAR is much faster) there is no reason to use VARCHAR over TEXT for long fields - there are some engine specific optimisations in MySQL to tune the data retrieval according to length, and you should use the correct column type to take advantage of these.

In case you're using MyISAM an in-depth discussion on the topic is here.

Thresathresh

@Andy, this is interesting because according to idstam, above, you can do full text indexing on VARCHAR. He cited this article, which I'm yet to read: devarticles.com/c/a/MySQL/… – Monserratemonsieur

Fulltext supported on both column types for MyISAM anyway: Full-text indexes can be used only with MyISAM tables, and can be created only for CHAR, VARCHAR, or TEXT columns. dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/fulltext-search.html – Thresathresh

@Andy, thanks. I had no idea. So if I wanted to use a Full-text index to allow my users to search description fields, I have to convert my table to MyISAM? Also, if I understood you correctly, LONG VARCHAR, or above 255 characters, is going to behave the same way as TEXT and BLOB? – Monserratemonsieur

Table conversion has its own disadvantages. Normalising the description field to its own MyISAM table and joining on it will allow simultaneous use of the robust features of InnoDB and the single desirable feature of MyISAM :) – Thresathresh

@Andy, interesting approach. So much to think about. Everything was really simple until about a15 minutes ago! :) Thank you! – Monserratemonsieur

@Andy, PS: when does VARCHAR become considered LONG VARCHAR? Is there a character threshold? – Monserratemonsieur

It should be clarified what is specifically meant by "long fields" - for string lengths less than or equal to 255, VARCHAR consumes one byte less of overhead. – Persson

Answer 2

One difference between VARCHAR and TEXT is that you can declare a DEFAULT clause for a VARCHAR column, but not for a TEXT column.

@Andy is correct that InnoDB stores both VARCHAR and TEXT in the same way internally.

FULLTEXT indexes are supported on both VARCHAR and TEXT. Prior to 5.6, you must use MyISAM to get that type of index. In MySQL 5.6, it finally supports FULLTEXT in InnoDB. Though you should test it carefully, because it seems to return different results than the implementation in MyISAM.

However, Sphinx Search is faster and richer in features than either implementation in MySQL. See my overview in Full-Text Search Throwdown.

@Mohammed asked:

when does VARCHAR become considered LONG VARCHAR? Is there a character threshold?

If you declare a length of up to 255 bytes, it can encode the length of a given string using one byte. If you declare the column max length over 255 bytes, it will use two bytes to encode the length.

You can declare a column as LONG VARCHAR, but this is really just an alias for MEDIUMTEXT.

mysql> create table test ( l long varchar);

mysql> show create table test\G

CREATE TABLE `test` (
  `l` mediumtext
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1

Greta

Answer 3

If your content fits in a varchar column then use varchar.

Varchar data is stored in each row. Text data is stored as blobs outside of the table.

According to this test, varchar is about three times faster than text.

Dearly

interesting, thank you for that. Can VARCHAR columns be full-text indexed for search purposes? – Monserratemonsieur

Yes, according to this: devarticles.com/c/a/MySQL/… – Dearly