I have below exception
javax.persistence.PersistenceException: Exception [EclipseLink-4002] (Eclipse Persistence Services - 2.5.2.v20140319-9ad6abd): org.eclipse.persistence.exceptions.DatabaseException Internal Exception: com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.CommunicationsException: The last packet successfully received from the server was 70,400,002 milliseconds ago. The last packet sent successfully to the server was 70,400,003 milliseconds ago. is longer than the server configured value of 'wait_timeout'. You should consider either expiring and/or testing connection validity before use in your application, increasing the server configured values for client timeouts, or using the Connector/J connection property 'autoReconnect=true' to avoid this problem.
I did some research and change persistance.xml to this
Latest
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<persistence version="2.1" xmlns="http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/persistence" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/persistence http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/persistence/persistence_2_1.xsd">
<persistence-unit name="unicorn" transaction-type="RESOURCE_LOCAL">
<provider>org.hibernate.ejb.HibernatePersistence</provider>
<class>com.rh.xxx</class>
<properties>
<property name="hibernate.connection.driver_class" value="com.mysql.jdbc.Driver"/>
<property name="hibernate.dialect" value="org.hibernate.dialect.MySQLDialect"/>
<property name="hibernate.connection.url" value="jdbc:mysql://xxx:3306/unicorndb?zeroDateTimeBehavior=convertToNull"/>
<property name="hibernate.connection.password" value="xxx"/>
<property name="hibernate.connection.username" value="student"/>
<property name="hibernate.c3p0.max_size" value="100" /> <!--max number of JDBC connections -->
<property name="hibernate.c3p0.min_size" value="10" /> <!--minimum number of JDBC connections-->
<property name="hibernate.c3p0.idle_test_period" value="500" />
<property name="hibernate.c3p0.acquire_increment" value="1" />
</properties>
</persistence-unit>
</persistence>
Did the latest code looked correct?
Any help would be appreciated