What's the difference between Laravel Blade's `@yield` and `@include`?
Asked Answered
F

8

54

I'm learning Laravel (starting at version 5.3) and these two Blade directives look very similar, the only difference I know is that @include injects the parent's variables and can also send other variables.

What's the difference between @yield and @include?

When should I use @yield?

When should I use @include?

Forest answered 28/1, 2017 at 23:43 Comment(0)
P
44

@yield is mainly used to define a section in a layout. When that layout is extended with @extends, you can define what goes in that section with the @section directive in your views.

The layout usually contains your HTML, <head>, <body>, <header> and <footer>s. You define an area (@yield) within the layout that your pages which are extending the template will put their content into.

In your master template you define the area. For example:

<body>
    @yield('content')
</body>

Let's say your home page extends that layout

@extends('layouts.app')

@section('content')
    // home page content here
@endsection

Any HTML you define in the content section on your homepage view in the 'content' section will be injected into the layout it extended in that spot.

@include is used for reusable HTML just like a standard PHP include. It does not have that parent/child relationship like @yield and @section.

I highly suggest reading the Laravel Blade documentation for a more comprehensive description.

Pecker answered 29/1, 2017 at 2:21 Comment(2)
Your answer does not really aswer the question. What you just told is that both @yield and @include injects HTML into a parent file. Laravel documentation is also very poor. It is not targeted at person who is new to laravel. The main difference between @yield and @include is: @include defines view to inject into parent. @yield defines section to be injected. @yield works only if your view @extends the parent view.Flip
I agree with the prior comment. I am reading the Laravel documentation (v8.x) on Blade templates and I am having a hard time understanding how it all works. I understand the concept of templating, but Laravel doesn't go into detail about how it's all structured. They provide examples and you're left trying to understand the structure based off that. Doesn't help that many online tutorials I've reviewed simply parrot the Laravel documentation.Pants
D
27

@include and @yield are two completely different types of operations to import code into the current file.

@include - import the contents of a separate file into the current file at the location in which it is placed. i.e.:

Layout file:

< some html or other script >

@include('include.file_name') // "include." indicates the subdirectory that the file is in

< more html or other script >

Include File ( a blade file with a block of code ):

< some cool code here >

The contents of 'file_name' ( also a blade file ) is then imported in where the @include directive is located.

@yield imports code from a "section" in the child file ( the "view" blade file. ) i.e.:

Layout file:

< some html or other script >

@yield('needed_section_name')

< more html or other script >

The following section is needed in the "view" blade file that is set to "extend" that layout file.

"View" blade file:

@extends('layout.file_name')
... code as neeeded

@section('needed_section_name')
< some cool code here >
@stop

...
more code as needed

Now the layout file will import in the section of code that matches the naming used.

More on the subject here....

Deadhead answered 20/12, 2017 at 15:23 Comment(3)
So this definitely clarifies how they are different. But could you share an example of when yield is "better" or more appropriate than an include? Because in both cases you're just including code from another location - whether it's selectively including the code from another file or not.Osteen
This seems like the best answer.Notarize
This seems like the best answer , in short words include =>>all page content yield => part of page contentSickle
C
7

The difference between @yield and @include is how you use them.

If you have a static kind of content, like a navbar, this part of the page will always be in the same place in the layout. When you use @include in the layout file, the navbar will be put once per layout. But if you use @yield you will be enforced to make a @section of the navbar on every page that @extends the layout.

@yield is, on the other hand, a better choice when content is changing on all the pages but you still want to use the same layout everywhere. If you use @include you'll have to make a new layout for every page, because of the difference of content.

Chopping answered 17/7, 2018 at 22:16 Comment(1)
You can pass some wars to includes and make them "dynamic", right?Viral
S
4

Today I was trying to figure out this difference as well, and where to use each, and why would I want to use one over the other. Please be warned this answer is verbose and probably very over-explained.

Snapey from the Laracasts forums got me started thinking about them properly: https://laracasts.com/discuss/channels/laravel/whats-the-difference-between-atinclude-and-atyield

First off, @include is going to include an entire file, just like the PHP include function. That's great if you're just dumping an entire file of content into the <body> of your page, for example the following is going to include everything inside of 'content.blade.php':

<!-- layout.blade.php -->

<body>

@include('content')

</body>
<!-- content.blade.php -->
<div>
    <div>
        <p>Hey this is my content.</p>
    </div>
    <div>
        <span>and stuff</span>
    </div>
</div>

But @yield, in conjunction with @extends and the @section and @endsection directives, will allow you to have your content chunked into separate sections, but kept all in one file. Then you can @yield it into the layout in separate chunks. The visual that comes to mind is shuffling one half of a deck of cards into the other half, in a classic "riffle" shuffle:

<!-- content.blade.php -->

@extends('layout')

@section('top_content')
    <h1>Hey I'm the title</h1>
@endsection

@section('middle_content')
    <p>Hey how's it going</p>
@endsection


@section('other_content')
    <p>It's over now.</p>
@endsection
<!-- layout.blade.php -->

<body>

    <div>
        @yield('top_content')
    </div>

    <p>Some static content</p>

    <div>
        @yield('middle_content')
    </div>

    <p>Some more static content</p>

    <div>
        @yield('other_content')
    </div>

    <div>Static footer content of some kind</div>

</body>

Secondly and maybe more importantly, the flow of control is sort of inverted, in a way that makes everything much more coherent. In the first example, with @include, you'd be calling the layout file with the view helper, in sort of a top-down way. For example this might be your code:

Route::get('/', function () {
    return view('layout');
});

But with @yield and @extends, (as in the second example) you call the content file itself, and the content file will first look at the @extends directive to drape itself with the layout file, like it is putting on a coat. So it happens in reverse, in a sense, like bottom-up. Then the @yield directives inject the content as specified. The content file is who you are talking to in your router/controller:

Route::get('/', function () {
    return view('content');
});

You call the content view, it looks at the @extends directive to pick the layout, and then the @yield directives in the layout file inject the matching @section sections into the layout.

So this way is much more useful because in practice you'll be referring to different content when you refer to different views.

If you were only using the @include statement to build your views, then you'd have to pass a different content slug to the layout file that you are calling every time, maybe like this:

Route::get('/welcome', function () {
    return view('layout', ['content' => 'welcome']);
});

Route::get('/profile', function () {
    return view('layout', ['content' => 'profile']);
});
<!-- layout.blade.php -->

<body>

@include($content)

</body>

And that seems like a mess to me.

That all being said, @include seems like a great way to include a little snippet in your layout file (the one called by the @extends directive), like the nav bar, or the footer, or something you just want to separate out of your layout file for organizational purposes.

Swart answered 16/2, 2021 at 3:26 Comment(0)
M
2

@include used for reusable code like navbar, we have to design navbar one time and use it in our whole site.

@yield used for sections that change again and again like body.

Mozarab answered 5/9, 2021 at 7:49 Comment(0)
B
1

@yield should be used when your contents will be changed @include should be used for contents that wont change. e.g header, footer

Branca answered 5/1, 2021 at 15:21 Comment(0)
J
0

for example you have already your layout structure where you @include('some scripts or style'). it will not allow you to change its directive while @yield you can change its content. means you create a section to yield into your layout.blade.php. you can use yield also if you have a specific script or style in each page.

@include('layouts.nav') //default when you call layout.blade.php

<div class="container"> 
  @yield('content') //changes according to your view
</div>

@include('layouts.footer') //yes you can use @yield if you have specific script.
Jungian answered 29/3, 2019 at 6:0 Comment(0)
A
0

Simple explanation:

You have a file where you want to include a section. And at first you think that in the controller you need to return this file to the view, but it turns out that this is not so, just return the file with the section sections and yield will work.

Acquah answered 14/1 at 3:35 Comment(0)

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.