HTML.HiddenFor value set
Asked Answered
S

7

62
@Html.HiddenFor(model => model.title, new { id= "natureOfVisitField", @value = '@Model.title'})

it doesen't work! how to set the value?

Stefaniastefanie answered 3/9, 2012 at 13:49 Comment(1)
Check this: codingfusion.com/Post/HTML-HiddenFor-set-value-in-Asp-Net-MVCInstrumentalist
A
29

You shouldn't need to set the value in the attributes parameter. MVC should automatically bind it for you.

@Html.HiddenFor(model => model.title, new { id= "natureOfVisitField" })
Applaud answered 3/9, 2012 at 13:51 Comment(6)
It's ok but I do a big mistake! Sorry! ThanksStefaniastefanie
@EdPlunkett why wouldn't it work? Unless you set the value in get method of the controller and send it to the view, it will work perfectly.Townsville
@Biplov13 No foolin', it didn't work. I now think the reason it wasn't working was that my action method wasn't accepting the model as a parameter, or possibly it wasn't attributed with [HttpGet], or something like that. Unfortunately I don't have time to go back right now and recreate it and nail it down.Althing
See the answer from @Tejasvi Hegde below for a more complete understanding.Asymmetric
This works for me. Using .NET 4.5.2 and ASP.NET MVC 4.Digitiform
Thanks @Townsville - if you have sent the same model in the get method of the controller was the problem for me, setting the value using hiddenFor wasn't working because the get method's value was persisting (which in my case was null).Purl
R
113

For setting value in hidden field do in the following way:

@Html.HiddenFor(model => model.title, 
                new { id= "natureOfVisitField", Value = @Model.title})

It will work

Repairer answered 2/5, 2013 at 5:8 Comment(2)
I know I'm more than 2 years late with this, but its important to note that the Html tag rendered with this will have distinct Value and value tags. You want to use value because that's where the controller will look for your dataCheckerberry
No, @Ortund, miss! Other way around, it should start from CAP ;)Stock
T
61

Strange but, Try with @Value , capital "V"

e.g. (working on MVC4)

@Html.HiddenFor(m => m.Id, new { @Value = Model.Id })

Update:

Found that @Value (capital V) is creating another attribute with "Value" along with "value", using small @value seems to be working too!

Need to check the MVC source code to find more.


Update, After going through how it works internally:

First of all forget all these workarounds (I have kept in for the sake of continuity here), now looks silly :)

Basically, it happens when a model is posted and the model is returned back to same page.

The value is accessed (and formed into html) in InputHelper method (InputExtensions.cs) using following code fragment

string attemptedValue = (string)htmlHelper.GetModelStateValue(fullName, typeof(string));

The GetModelStateValue method (in Htmlelper.cs) retrieves the value as

ViewData.ModelState.TryGetValue(key, out modelState)

Here is the issue, since the value is accessed from ViewData.ModelState dictionary. This returns the value posted from the page instead of modified value!!

i.e. If your posted value of the variable (e.g. Person.Id) is 0 but you set the value inside httpPost action (e.g. Person.Id = 2), the ModelState still retains the old value "0" and the attemptedValue contains "0" ! so the field in rendered page will contain "0" as value!!

Workaround if you are returning model to same page : Clear the item from ModelState,

e.g.

ModelState.Remove("Id"); 

This will remove the item from dictionary and the ViewData.ModelState.TryGetValue(key, out modelState) returns null, and the next statement (inside InputExtensions.cs) takes the actual value (valueParameter) passed to HiddenFor(m => m.Id)

this is done in the following line in InputExtensions.cs

tagBuilder.MergeAttribute("value", attemptedValue ?? ((useViewData) ? htmlHelper.EvalString(fullName, format) : valueParameter), isExplicitValue);

Summary:

Clear the item in ModelState using:

ModelState.Remove("...");

Hope this is helpful.

Tammitammie answered 12/2, 2014 at 10:34 Comment(9)
I find this very strange but it seems to be correct. I added the ModelState.Remove("<columnName>") in my controller and my problem went away.Karat
Great catch. This problem took some time and this answer to track down. It concerns me that I may have missed some other subtleties like this elsewhere.Asymmetric
Value with "V" worked for me, actually very strange! Thank you very much.Fleurette
The update to this answer should be added to the accepted answer - this insight is invaluable! Thanks a lot for sharing it Tejasvi Hedge!Tion
Unbelievable. Thanks Tejasvi! In my case the code I added looked like this (this may help someone) ModelState.Remove("Invoice.InvoiceId");Allista
Another option is to call ModelState.Clear(); instead of explicitly deleting the ID. Of course only if the ModelState does not contain any errors. I call clear when ModelState.IsValid == true and the data has been successfully saved.Carreon
Invaluable answer, you saved my life! For me I simply replaced Html.HiddenFor(model => model.Id) with <input type="hidden" value="@Model.Id" />. Using @Model.Id instead seems to be more readable than ModelState.Clear().Bathhouse
All html helpers in ASP.NET MVC first try to get data from ModelState not from actual Model. It's a long time gotcha that trips up a lot of people. A good explanation why it works that way is this blog weblog.west-wind.com/posts/2012/apr/20/… Arguably it makes less sense for "Hidden" helper, but I guess at least it's consistent with other helpers. As mentioned you can just use model explicitly to render hidden input, like <input id="Id" name="Id" type="hidden" value="@Model.Id" /> instead of clearing model state.Cardoza
It seems not to work anymore with .NET 8. Don't know why.Breadwinner
A
29

You shouldn't need to set the value in the attributes parameter. MVC should automatically bind it for you.

@Html.HiddenFor(model => model.title, new { id= "natureOfVisitField" })
Applaud answered 3/9, 2012 at 13:51 Comment(6)
It's ok but I do a big mistake! Sorry! ThanksStefaniastefanie
@EdPlunkett why wouldn't it work? Unless you set the value in get method of the controller and send it to the view, it will work perfectly.Townsville
@Biplov13 No foolin', it didn't work. I now think the reason it wasn't working was that my action method wasn't accepting the model as a parameter, or possibly it wasn't attributed with [HttpGet], or something like that. Unfortunately I don't have time to go back right now and recreate it and nail it down.Althing
See the answer from @Tejasvi Hegde below for a more complete understanding.Asymmetric
This works for me. Using .NET 4.5.2 and ASP.NET MVC 4.Digitiform
Thanks @Townsville - if you have sent the same model in the get method of the controller was the problem for me, setting the value using hiddenFor wasn't working because the get method's value was persisting (which in my case was null).Purl
L
12

It is just Value, not @value.. Try it. I'm not sure about @Model.title, maybe it's just Model.title

Lagan answered 3/9, 2012 at 13:53 Comment(2)
@Stefaniastefanie did you try both? It should look like: @Html.HiddenFor(model => model.title, new { id= "natureOfVisitField", Value = '@Model.title'}) or just Model.title at the end.. It runs in my projectLagan
still works on MVC 5. caveat: case-sensitive ValueSalinometer
A
4

Necroing this question because I recently ran into the problem myself, when trying to add a related property to an existing entity. I just ended up making a nice extension method:

    public static MvcHtmlString HiddenFor<TModel, TProperty>(this HtmlHelper<TModel> htmlHelper, Expression<Func<TModel, TProperty>> expression, TProperty value)
    {
        string expressionText = ExpressionHelper.GetExpressionText(expression);
        string propertyName = htmlHelper.ViewContext.ViewData.TemplateInfo.GetFullHtmlFieldName(expressionText);

        return htmlHelper.Hidden(propertyName, value);
    }

Use like so:

@Html.HiddenFor(m => m.RELATED_ID, Related.Id)

Note that this has a similar signature to the built-in HiddenFor, but uses generic typing, so if Value is of type System.Object, you'll actually be invoking the one built into the framework. Not sure why you'd be editing a property of type System.Object in your views though...

Androw answered 3/7, 2013 at 18:25 Comment(0)
A
0

The @ symbol when specifying HtmlAttributes is used when the "thing" you are trying to set is a keyword c#. So for instance the word class, you cannot specify class, you must use @class.

Acumen answered 13/4, 2018 at 13:35 Comment(0)
H
-1

You can do this way

@Html.HiddenFor(model=>model.title, new {ng_init = string.Format("model.title='{0}'", Model.title) })
Hengelo answered 26/10, 2018 at 9:57 Comment(0)

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.