i improved the solutions of RHTs/Brad Ms and of Lestos answer.
i extended both solutions in leaving the state there, where it was found.
So i save the current ResultSet position and restore it after i created the maps.
The rs is the ResultSet, its a field variable and so in my solutions-snippets not visible.
I replaced the specific Map in Brad Ms solution to the gerneric Map.
public List<Map<String, Object>> resultAsListMap() throws SQLException
{
var md = rs.getMetaData();
var columns = md.getColumnCount();
var list = new ArrayList<Map<String, Object>>();
var currRowIndex = rs.getRow();
rs.beforeFirst();
while (rs.next())
{
HashMap<String, Object> row = new HashMap<String, Object>(columns);
for (int i = 1; i <= columns; ++i)
{
row.put(md.getColumnName(i), rs.getObject(i));
}
list.add(row);
}
rs.absolute(currRowIndex);
return list;
}
In Lestos solution, i optimized the code. In his code he have to lookup the Maps each iteration of that for-loop. I reduced that to only one array-acces each for-loop iteration. So the program must not seach each iteration step for that string-key.
public Map<String, List<Object>> resultAsMapList() throws SQLException
{
var md = rs.getMetaData();
var columns = md.getColumnCount();
var tmp = new ArrayList[columns];
var map = new HashMap<String, List<Object>>(columns);
var currRowIndex = rs.getRow();
rs.beforeFirst();
for (int i = 1; i <= columns; ++i)
{
tmp[i - 1] = new ArrayList<>();
map.put(md.getColumnName(i), tmp[i - 1]);
}
while (rs.next())
{
for (int i = 1; i <= columns; ++i)
{
tmp[i - 1].add(rs.getObject(i));
}
}
rs.absolute(currRowIndex);
return map;
}
rs.close()
before you return. Copying the data from result set toHashMap
is correct way provided that you need to access the whole data set. – Tarp