scikit-learn cross validation, negative values with mean squared error
Asked Answered
B

3

71

When I use the following code with Data matrix X of size (952,144) and output vector y of size (952), mean_squared_error metric returns negative values, which is unexpected. Do you have any idea?

from sklearn.svm import SVR
from sklearn import cross_validation as CV

reg = SVR(C=1., epsilon=0.1, kernel='rbf')
scores = CV.cross_val_score(reg, X, y, cv=10, scoring='mean_squared_error')

all values in scores are then negative.

Bachelor answered 29/1, 2014 at 22:18 Comment(2)
Yes, this is supposed to happen. I forget exactly why, but I believe it's related to them minimizing the result when performing grid searching. The actual MSE is simply the postive version of the number you're getting.Sire
possible duplicate of sklearn GridSearchCV with Pipeline -- @Sire is right, when the unified scoring API was introduced, we decided to always maximize the score, which means scores that are actually losses need to be negated.Ridgeling
G
94

Trying to close this out, so am providing the answer that David and larsmans have eloquently described in the comments section:

Yes, this is supposed to happen. The actual MSE is simply the positive version of the number you're getting.

The unified scoring API always maximizes the score, so scores which need to be minimized are negated in order for the unified scoring API to work correctly. The score that is returned is therefore negated when it is a score that should be minimized and left positive if it is a score that should be maximized.

This is also described in sklearn GridSearchCV with Pipeline.

Geminius answered 5/12, 2014 at 19:36 Comment(2)
Thanks for this. But while going for the best model, the negative MSE's are not considered while selecting the best model. It just takes the smallest in the positive MSE's for the best models. Any way to get around this? Thanks in advance!Foxed
Thanks! One question, if I've gotten [-44, -33, -22] as mse scores just think of them as mse =44, 33, 22 ?Johny
P
3

You can fix it by changing scoring method to "neg_mean_squared_error" as you can see below:

from sklearn.svm import SVR
from sklearn import cross_validation as CV

reg = SVR(C=1., epsilon=0.1, kernel='rbf')
scores = CV.cross_val_score(reg, X, y, cv=10, scoring='neg_mean_squared_error')
Phlebotomy answered 13/5, 2020 at 17:33 Comment(0)
C
1

To see what are available scoring keys use:

import sklearn
print(sklearn.metrics.SCORERS.keys())

You can either use 'r2' or 'neg_mean_squared_error'. There are lots of options based on your requirement.

Cuellar answered 24/1, 2021 at 8:23 Comment(0)

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.