I ran into a strange situation that alignof(__m512)
is not equal to std::alignment_of<__m512>::value
compiled by Apple's clang. After some testing I found that when alignof(T)
is evaluated inside a template with T=__m512
, the result is different with direct alignof(__m512)
.
I also ran several test compiled by g++ and non-Apple's clang on ubuntu(WSL) and got correct(I thought) behavior.
Is this a bug of Apple's clang or an issue about implemented behavior?
#include <immintrin.h> //avx headers
#include <cstdio>
#include <typeinfo>
#include <type_traits>
void test_directly() {
printf("directly: typeid %s alignof %zu\n", typeid(__m512).name(), alignof(__m512));
}
template<typename T>
void test_as_template_argument() {
static_assert(std::is_same<T, __m512>::value, "assert");
printf("template: typeid %s alignof %zu\n", typeid(T).name(), alignof(T));
}
int main() {
test_directly();
test_as_template_argument<__m512>();
return 0;
}
output(compiled with clang++ -std=c++17 -march=native
):
directly: typeid Dv16_f alignof 64
template: typeid Dv16_f alignof 32
clang's version:
Apple clang version 11.0.3 (clang-1103.0.32.62)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin19.4.0
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin
macOS's version: macOS Catalina 10.15.4 (19E2269) Darwin 19.4.0
std::alignment_of<T>::value
might be different fromalignof(T)
#39061, but it dates back to late 2018, yet clang v11 came out late 2020. – With