I didn't want to lose some information after a git pull
, so I did a git fetch
before. Where can I read the new modifications after a git fetch
? I went to the FETCH_HEAD
file, but there was nothing more than a big number.
git fetch origin
by default fetches everything from the remote named "origin" and updates (or creates) the so-called "remote-tracking branches" for that remote. Say, for the remote named "origin" which contain branches named "master" and "feature", running git fetch remote
will result in the remote-tracking branches named "origin/master" and "origin/feature" being updated (or created, if they're not exist). You could see them in the output of git branch -a
(notice "-a").
Now, the usual Git setup is that (some of) your local branches follow certain remote branches (usually same-named). That is, your local "master" branch follows "origin/master" etc.
So, after you fetched, to see what remote "master" has compared to your local "master", you ask Git to show you exactly this:
git log origin/master ^master
which means «all commits reachable from "origin/master" which do not include commits reachable from "master"» or, alternatively
git log master..origin/master
which has the same meaning. See the "gitrevisions" manual page for more info, especially the "Specifying ranges" part. Also see the examples in the git-log manual page
You're free to customize the output of git log
as you see fit as it supports a whole lot of options affecting it.
Note that your local branch might also have commits which the matching remote branch does not contain (yet). To get an overview of them you have to reverse the revisions passed to git log
for (hopefully) obvious reasons.
As usual, it's essential to educate yourself to understand the underlying concepts before starting to use a tool. Please do.
git diff master origin/master
wasn't mentioned? It seems to address the OP's question very simply...? (I'm newish to Git and learning so please correct me if wrong.) –
Heteronomy master
that you did not get from their master
(your now-updated origin/master
). It's not a wrong thing to do, but it won't show you the commits they have that you don't (have on your master
), while the git log
will do exactly that. –
Rood If you just want to see what files will be modified if you do a GIT PULL, do this:
git fetch && git diff HEAD @{u} --name-only
If you want to see ALL differences between your current version and the incoming version, including uncommited local modifications, type this:
git fetch && git diff @{u} --name-only
It is a shortcut to refer to the upstream branch which the current branch is tracking
–
Sophomore Try
git log --oneline --decorate origin/master
This will give you the change log from the master
head of the origin
remote (you can substitute any other remote branch as needed). You'll get an output somewhat like this:
234121 (origin/master) Commit message 5
872373 Commit message 4
623748 Commit message 3
235090 (master) Commit message 2
192399 Commit message 1
The commit marked (master)
is the head of your local master
branch. The commit marked (origin/master)
is the head of the remote's master
branch.
git log --all --oneline --graph
–
Selfinductance I mostly do git log origin/master
to see the log of remote repo.
You can compare changes like git diff master origin/master
which will compare the changes of the master branch with your master branch in remote repo.
git log --stat origin/master
to see which files were changed during each commit. –
Monadelphous © 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.
gitk
? If you do, rungitk --all
to view the current state of all your branches on your local machine, even those branches updated by the fetch. – Juanjuanagit show object
where object is the big hashed number... – Walkon