In Python, how do you convert a `datetime` object to seconds?
Asked Answered
S

13

308

I have a bunch of datetime objects and I want to calculate the number of seconds since a fixed time in the past for each one (for example since January 1, 1970).

import datetime
t = datetime.datetime(2009, 10, 21, 0, 0)

This seems to be only differentiating between dates that have different days:

t.toordinal()

How does one convert a datetime object to seconds?

Sewerage answered 21/10, 2011 at 17:9 Comment(3)
related: Converting datetime.date to UTC timestamp in PythonPicul
I'd probably convert both to S since epoch and go from there: int(t.timestamp())Katlynkatmai
for the opposite operation go here: convert-seconds-since-epoch-to-a-datetime-objectRickierickman
O
301

For the special date of January 1, 1970 there are multiple options.

For any other starting date you need to get the difference between the two dates in seconds. Subtracting two dates gives a timedelta object, which as of Python 2.7 has a total_seconds() function.

>>> (t-datetime.datetime(1970,1,1)).total_seconds()
1256083200.0

The starting date is usually specified in UTC, so for proper results the datetime you feed into this formula should be in UTC as well. If your datetime isn't in UTC already, you'll need to convert it before you use it, or attach a tzinfo class that has the proper offset.

As noted in the comments, if you have a tzinfo attached to your datetime then you'll need one on the starting date as well or the subtraction will fail; for the example above I would add tzinfo=pytz.utc if using Python 2 or tzinfo=timezone.utc if using Python 3.

Outofdoor answered 21/10, 2011 at 17:21 Comment(15)
I prefer this method because it only requires a single import.Evora
Thanks for the help! (Chosen because it is the most general solution)Sewerage
Python now warns me: "TypeError: can't subtract offset-naive and offset-aware datetimes" What's the best solution to fix that?Treillage
@Charybdis, try datetime.datetime(1970,1,1,tzinfo=pytz.utc).Outofdoor
Consider using: datetime.datetime.utcfromtimestamp(0) I've used this to get the 'epoch' easily. Note that epoch is not always the same on all systems.Allocate
Be very careful with timezones here. I'm at UTC+2, which means that the output of time.time() and datetime.now() - datetime(1970, 1, 1) differ by 7200 seconds. Rather use (t - datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(0)).total_seconds(). Do not use utcfromtimestamp(0) if you want to convert a datetime in your local timezone.Kessinger
@D.A.: Python does not support non-POSIX epochs. All systems where python works use the same Epoch: 1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTCPicul
@Carl: it is also wrong if utc_offset_at_1970 is different from utc_offset_now (as it is in many timezones). Convert local time to utc time first then use this answer to get POSIX timestamp.Picul
@MarkRansom: the formula produces POSIX timestamp iff t is a UTC time.Picul
@J.F.Sebastian good point, I should have mentioned that in the answer. The question used a naive datetime object so you can't make any assumptions about its time zone.Outofdoor
@J.F.Sebastian I finally got around to adding the UTC qualifiers to this answer, thanks for the jab in the other question.Outofdoor
@MarkRansom: drop "usually specified in UTC". It is not a matter of preference. POSIX epoch that is also used on Windows is always: 1970-01-01 UTC. t must be in utc for the formula to make sense.Picul
@J.F.Sebastian my answer is applicable to more than just the POSIX epoch, so it stays the way it is.Outofdoor
This is working nicely for me, but what about if you want to check whether the next day starts and you have datetime seconds? For instance, say you start your day in the midnightExsert
@Exsert you can use the modulo of the number of seconds in a day to find out what time of day it is. Of course that will be in UTC so you might want to add or subtract the offset for your time zone.Outofdoor
U
219

Starting from Python 3.3 this becomes super easy with the datetime.timestamp() method. This of course will only be useful if you need the number of seconds from 1970-01-01 UTC.

from datetime import datetime
dt = datetime.today()  # Get timezone naive now
seconds = dt.timestamp()

The return value will be a float representing even fractions of a second. If the datetime is timezone naive (as in the example above), it will be assumed that the datetime object represents the local time, i.e. It will be the number of seconds from current time at your location to 1970-01-01 UTC.

Ur answered 10/5, 2015 at 20:36 Comment(4)
This should be the accepted answer / the accepted answer should be updated accordingly.Pili
Time to upgrade I guess ;)Pili
is possible to calculate this distance from another starting date? (i mean to change the 1970-01-01 date)Saucier
@Parsifal, yep! You can subtract a new datetime object representing 1970-01-01 from dt; i.e. dt - datetime(1970, 1, 1). Where dt is datetime.today() from the answer above.Jillane
H
137

To get the Unix time (seconds since January 1, 1970):

>>> import datetime, time
>>> t = datetime.datetime(2011, 10, 21, 0, 0)
>>> time.mktime(t.timetuple())
1319148000.0
Historical answered 21/10, 2011 at 17:14 Comment(4)
be careful when using time.mktime for it's express of local time and it's platform-dependentVergne
Be careful indeed. It bit me to my ass big timePappas
it assumes that t is a local time. UTC offset for the local timezone may have been different in the past and if mktime() (C library) has no access to a historical timezone data on a given platform than it may fail (pytz is a portable way to access the tz database). Also, local time may be ambiguous e.g., during DST transitions -- you need additional info to disambiguate e.g., if you know that consecutive date/time values should be increasing in a log filePicul
Be careful when using this with times that have fractions of a second. time.mktime(datetime.datetime(2019, 8, 3, 4, 5, 6, 912000).timetuple()) results in 1564819506.0, silently dropping the milliseconds, but datetime.datetime(2019, 8, 3, 4, 5, 6, 912000).timestamp() (Andrzej Pronobis' answer) results in 1564819506.912, the expected result.Tocopherol
D
33

Maybe off-the-topic: to get UNIX/POSIX time from datetime and convert it back:

>>> import datetime, time
>>> dt = datetime.datetime(2011, 10, 21, 0, 0)
>>> s = time.mktime(dt.timetuple())
>>> s
1319148000.0

# and back
>>> datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(s)
datetime.datetime(2011, 10, 21, 0, 0)

Note that different timezones have impact on results, e.g. my current TZ/DST returns:

>>>  time.mktime(datetime.datetime(1970, 1, 1, 0, 0).timetuple())
-3600 # -1h

therefore one should consider normalizing to UTC by using UTC versions of the functions.

Note that previous result can be used to calculate UTC offset of your current timezone. In this example this is +1h, i.e. UTC+0100.

References:

Docker answered 28/2, 2015 at 10:42 Comment(3)
mktime() may fail. In general, you need pytz to convert local time to utc, to get POSIX timestamp.Picul
calendar.timegm() seems to be the utc version of time.mktime()Schadenfreude
Also beware: mktime is up to 10x slower than other approaches. Since it's not unlikely you're doing this in a hot path, it matters.Facelifting
B
28

int (t.strftime("%s")) also works

Buckling answered 4/3, 2014 at 19:12 Comment(3)
Works for me in Python 2.7, with import datetime; t = datetime.datetime(2011, 10, 21, 0, 0) (as specified by OP). But really, I doubt %s is a recently-added time format.Buckling
@dan3: wrong. %s is not supported (it may work on some platforms iff t is a naive datetime object representing local time and if the local C library has access to the tz database otherwise the result may be wrong). Don't use it.Picul
%s is not documented anywhere. I sow it in real code and was wondering what is this and look in the documentation and there is no such thing as %s. There is only with big S just for the seconds.Longlived
H
16

from the python docs:

timedelta.total_seconds()

Return the total number of seconds contained in the duration. Equivalent to

(td.microseconds + (td.seconds + td.days * 24 * 3600) * 10**6) / 10**6

computed with true division enabled.

Note that for very large time intervals (greater than 270 years on most platforms) this method will lose microsecond accuracy.

This functionality is new in version 2.7.

Header answered 21/10, 2011 at 17:13 Comment(2)
there is a small problem with the calculation it must be 106 instead of 10*6 ... td.microseconds + (td.seconds + td.days * 24 * 3600) * 106) / 10**6Pacifically
@Pacifically great catch - the double asterisk is in my answer but stackoverflow consumes it, attempts to rectify only embolden the text.Header
S
4

I do not see this in all of the answers, although I guess it is the default need:

t_start = datetime.now()
sleep(2)
t_end = datetime.now()
duration = t_end - t_start
print(round(duration.total_seconds()))

If you do not use .total_seconds(), it throws: TypeError: type datetime.timedelta doesn't define __round__ method.

Example:

>>> duration
datetime.timedelta(seconds=53, microseconds=621861)
>>> round(duration.total_seconds())
54
>>> duration.seconds
53

Taking duration.seconds takes only the seconds, leaving aside the microseconds, the same as if you ran math.floor(duration.total_seconds()).

Sherylsheryle answered 26/2, 2022 at 21:21 Comment(0)
C
4

Comparing the 4 most common ways to do this, for accuracy:

Method 1: Manual Calculation

from datetime import datetime
total1 = int(datetimeobj.strftime('%S'))
total1 += int(datetimeobj.strftime('%M')) * 60
total1 += int(datetimeobj.strftime('%H')) * 60 * 60
total1 += (int(datetimeobj.strftime('%j')) - 1) * 60 * 60 * 24
total1 += (int(datetimeobj.strftime('%Y')) - 1970) * 60 * 60 * 24 * 365
print ("Method #1: Manual")
print ("Before: %s" % datetimeobj)
print ("Seconds: %s " % total1)
print ("After: %s" % datetime.fromtimestamp(total1))

Output:

Method #1: Manual
Before: 1970-10-01 12:00:00 
Seconds: 23630400 
After: 1970-10-01 16:00:00

Accuracy test: FAIL (time zone shift)

Method 2: Time Module

import time
from datetime import datetime
total2 = int(time.mktime(datetimeobj.timetuple()))
print ("Method #2: Time Module")
print ("Before: %s" % datetimeobj)
print ("Seconds: %s " % total2)
print ("After: %s" % datetime.fromtimestamp(total2))

Output:

Method #2: Time Module
Before: 1970-10-01 12:00:00 
Seconds: 23616000 
After: 1970-10-01 12:00:00

Accuracy test: PASS

Method 3: Calendar Module

import calendar
from datetime import datetime
total3 = calendar.timegm(datetimeobj.timetuple())
print ("Method #3: Calendar Module")
print ("Before: %s" % datetimeobj)
print ("Seconds: %s " % total3)
print ("After: %s" % datetime.fromtimestamp(total3))

Output:

Method #3: Calendar Module
Before: 1970-10-01 12:00:00
Seconds: 23616000
After: 1970-10-01 16:00:00

Accuracy test: FAIL (time zone shift)

Method 4: Datetime Timestamp

from datetime import datetime
total4 = datetimeobj.timestamp()
print ("Method #4: datetime timestamp")
print ("Before: %s" % datetimeobj)
print ("Seconds: %s " % total4)
print ("After: %s" % datetime.fromtimestamp(total4))

Output:

Method #2: Time Module
Before: 1970-10-01 12:00:00 
Seconds: 23616000 
After: 1970-10-01 12:00:00

Accuracy test: PASS

Conclusion

  • All 4 methods convert datetime to epoch (total seconds)
  • Both the Manual method and Calendar module method are time zone aware.
  • Both datetime.timestamp() and time.mktime() methods are time zone unaware.
  • Simplest method: datetime.timestamp()
Creed answered 21/5, 2022 at 8:21 Comment(0)
P
2

To convert a datetime object that represents time in UTC to POSIX timestamp:

from datetime import timezone

seconds_since_epoch = utc_time.replace(tzinfo=timezone.utc).timestamp()

To convert a datetime object that represents time in the local timezone to POSIX timestamp:

import tzlocal # $ pip install tzlocal

local_timezone = tzlocal.get_localzone()
seconds_since_epoch = local_timezone.localize(local_time, is_dst=None).timestamp()

See How do I convert local time to UTC in Python? If the tz database is available on a given platform; a stdlib-only solution may work.

Follow the links if you need solutions for <3.3 Python versions.

Picul answered 24/8, 2015 at 22:42 Comment(0)
B
1

I tried the standard library's calendar.timegm and it works quite well:

# convert a datetime to milliseconds since Epoch
def datetime_to_utc_milliseconds(aDateTime):
    return int(calendar.timegm(aDateTime.timetuple())*1000)

Ref: https://docs.python.org/2/library/calendar.html#calendar.timegm

Bracket answered 9/5, 2015 at 19:13 Comment(1)
it strips fractions of a second. It assumes that aDateTime is a UTC timePicul
E
0

Python provides operation on datetime to compute the difference between two date. In your case that would be:

t - datetime.datetime(1970,1,1)

The value returned is a timedelta object from which you can use the member function total_seconds to get the value in seconds.

(t - datetime.datetime(1970,1,1)).total_seconds()
Eulaheulalee answered 20/8, 2020 at 10:51 Comment(0)
H
0
import datetime
import math


def getSeconds(inputDate):
    time = datetime.date.today().strftime('%m/%d/%Y')
    date_time = datetime.datetime.strptime(time, '%m/%d/%Y')
    msg = inputDate
    props = msg.split(".")
    a_timedelta = datetime.timedelta
    if(len(props)==3):
        a_timedelta = date_time - datetime.datetime(int(props[0]),int(props[1]),int(props[2]))
    else:
        print("Invalid date format")
        return
    seconds = math.trunc(a_timedelta.total_seconds())
    print(seconds)
    return seconds

Example getSeconds("2022.1.1")

Hypochondriac answered 1/1, 2022 at 12:16 Comment(0)
K
-3

The standard way to find the processing time in ms of a block of code in python 3.x is the following:

import datetime

t_start = datetime.datetime.now()

# Here is the python3 code, you want 
# to check the processing time of

t_end = datetime.datetime.now()
print("Time taken : ", (t_end - t_start).total_seconds()*1000, " ms")
Kenway answered 20/8, 2020 at 7:17 Comment(0)

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.